On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 10:45:40 UTC, JS wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 10:10:10 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 09:44:17 UTC, JS wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
Yes and I will answer once you start asking question in
D.learn newsgroup.
Thanks... I'll just keep posting
On 07/09/2013 12:45 PM, JS wrote:
> Thanks... I'll just keep posting in here then...
You know, most people, when they get informed there's a dedicated
newsgroup/mailing list for language questions, are polite enough to say thank
you for the information, and take their question over to the appropri
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 11:06:22 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
P.S. Dicebot's responses to your questions have been
by-and-large correct and informative. I'm sure he genuinely
means he will try to help you if you post in the correct place.
I am always ready to help when it makes sense. But there
() = { ... }();)
This belongs in D.learn.
The code you provided is never going to give any "Function
literals can't be class members" error, although it does have
a lot of other things wrong with it.
1) The mixin template has no parameter list.
2) enum b = { }(); isn't valid without a fun
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 10:45:40 UTC, JS wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 10:10:10 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 09:44:17 UTC, JS wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
Yes and I will answer once you start asking question in
D.learn newsgroup.
Thanks... I'll just keep posting
is never going to give any "Function
literals can't be class members" error, although it does have a
lot of other things wrong with it.
1) The mixin template has no parameter list.
2) enum b = { }(); isn't valid without a function body. Did you
mean (){} ?
3) and it defin
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 10:10:10 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 09:44:17 UTC, JS wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
Yes and I will answer once you start asking question in D.learn
newsgroup.
Thanks... I'll just keep posting in here then...
produces no error, yet all are
essentially semantically equivalent... just the lamda version
requires less typing. (in fact, it would be nice to have a
simplification of template b() = { ... }();)
This belongs in D.learn.
The code you provided is never going to give any "Function
literals can
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 09:44:17 UTC, JS wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
Yes and I will answer once you start asking question in D.learn
newsgroup.
On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 22:41:41 UTC, JS wrote:
trying to use a lambda inside a sub template gives an error.
mixin template a
{
template b()
{
enum b = { }();
}
mixin(b!());
}
gives the error in the subject, removing the nesting or using a
function instead of a lamda produc
trying to use a lambda inside a sub template gives an error.
mixin template a
{
template b()
{
enum b = { }();
}
mixin(b!());
}
gives the error in the subject, removing the nesting or using a
function instead of a lamda produces no error, yet all are
essentially semantically
11 matches
Mail list logo