Good news, Rick! Thanks...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> The ability of the software that you requested has arrived. SCAMP will
> DEFINITELY not TX if the channel is busy with anything!
>
> Sometimes it a
Hmmm, I have a HK-232 modified with the Timewave upgrades. A PK-232 that I
will eventually do the same to. Also a HK-21 Pocket Packet that I just love.
Even have had them hooked up to a BBS computer system I used to run that
gave hams packet access over the phone line BBS systems. Was a great w
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dick Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i COULDN'T LOGIN EARLIER. But is ok now.
>
Tnx Dick
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="
i COULDN'T LOGIN EARLIER. But is ok now.
- Original Message -
From: "John Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 01:14
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Need cluster testers again
>
> get... can't open connection to 208.15.25.196
>
>
> At 07:04 PM 2/20/05, you wr
BOTTOM LINE:
your sound card just can't cut it.
And when using my ST-6 TU I can't only copy about 60% of the
sound cards on RTTY. why? Because your tones are in the
" ballpark " at best...
I've noticed that the local ANARTS broadcast is transmitted at 200Hz shift.
When did that become the norm
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:27 PM 2/20/05, you wrote:
>
>
> >OK, I have got myself connected, please give it a try.
> >
> >I had to change the forwarded ports on my DSL router.
>
>
> OK Andy it works
Yeah !! It only took me two day
At 09:27 PM 2/20/05, you wrote:
>OK, I have got myself connected, please give it a try.
>
>I had to change the forwarded ports on my DSL router.
OK Andy it works
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com
OK, I have got myself connected, please give it a try.
I had to change the forwarded ports on my DSL router.
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" width="200"
style="b
And of course, SCAMP, is about to become a primary transport mechanism for
Winlink... email over ham radio...as soon as Rick Muething finishes writing the
PMBO code...
__
Howard S. White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 AE6SM
"No Good Deed Goes U
Dave:
I actually don't agree that "Such Regulations are initially required".
However as a compromise, I would be willing to accept some limited form of
"Such Regulations" if it means that we can get out of "Technology Jail".
I use Luddites as a generic term to describe those who oppose inn
1.yes I am very active on all the modes but I also spend a lot of my spare
time experimenting with new modes such as SCAMP, etc...
2.While I value a statistically sound poll, such a poll as you suggest
would be totally unscientific and the results unreliable...
3.You miss the point
on 3.580 on hell if anyone wants to join field hell kb4hqa tom
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" width="200"
style="border:0" alt="Digital Spotter"/>
Yahoo!
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Ron Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Andy,
>
> When I connect or should I say try, I get a forceful reject message
>
> Ron W4LDE
I get the same thing, back to the drawing board..meanwhile the
cluster is up on the old computer gain and should allow co
Andy,
When I connect or should I say try, I get a forceful reject message
Ron W4LDE
obrienaj wrote:
>I have moved the cluster software to a faster, more reliable, PC on
>my network. That was no small accomplishment since the Cluster
>software was not friendly to a simple transfer. I need
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "obrienaj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --Not me...
>
>
> - In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Anyone else getting the below, everyltime you try to send to the
> group?
> > He needs to be removed, if that is
--Not me...
- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone else getting the below, everyltime you try to send to the
group?
> He needs to be removed, if that is the case.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PRO
Anyone else getting the below, everyltime you try to send to the group?
He needs to be removed, if that is the case.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: Your email requires verification
verify#P0CAlPOrJU
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm click on that, the command window comes up and says
connecting, then it
> just goes away. So something wrong?
>
Yep, give me about 30 more minutes
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://
Hmm click on that, the command window comes up and says connecting, then it
just goes away. So something wrong?
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.1.0 - Release Date: 2/18/2005
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTE
Even when I used the TNCs , I didnt used AMTOR or PACTOR. So, havent lost
anything there. I seem to be able to copy many more signals now, than when
I was using them too, mainly becuase there are many more signals there. The
sound card programs have opened up the world of digital to most hams, t
FYI, I have added a new archive for this group, I think it is easier
than the slow Yahoogroups method.
Test drive at
http://www.mail-archive.com/digitalradio@yahoogroups.com/
Andy K3UK
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>htt
One of the interesting upgrades out, is for the HK-232 / PK-232 series of
TNC's. Not only does the HK / PK232 series of TNC have excellent passive hf
filters, now they are further improved with cascaded DSP filters.
The ability to take the load off of the CPU is a great reason to use a TNC.
Th
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andy,
>
> Tried twice, just a blank screen here.
> Does not ask for my call or any input.
> Jerry K0HZI
Thanks Jerry, give unti around 0200 UTC, I need to add a few more
files
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CL
get... can't open connection to 208.15.25.196
At 07:04 PM 2/20/05, you wrote:
>I have moved the cluster software to a faster, more reliable, PC on
>my network. That was no small accomplishment since the Cluster
>software was not friendly to a simple transfer. I need a few tests,
>I am not s
How to Design BPL-Buster Communications
By careful analysis of interfering signals, a communications system
can be designed to optimally operate in the presence of BPL
interference. Yes... there are limitations, but with repetetive or
multi-carrier signals such as some of the BPL signals we have
Andy,
Tried twice, just a blank screen here.
Does not ask for my call or any input.
Jerry K0HZI
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" width="200"
style="border:0" al
I have moved the cluster software to a faster, more reliable, PC on
my network. That was no small accomplishment since the Cluster
software was not friendly to a simple transfer. I need a few tests,
I am not sure it is working correctly because I can't connect
myself. While I am working on
When was the last time you used that sound card and had a
ARQ Amtor or a Pactor ARQ QSO ? You can't do that with a
sound card.
I have been playing with a linux program but even it's only about
42% of the 100% of the TNC..
BOTTOM LINE:
your sound card just can't cut it.
And when using my ST-6 TU
I have several TNC's and oh no, several terminal units
as well. I also have a sound card setup in the mix of
digital equipment. You can't do ARQ modes with a sound
card except for HFTerm which required Linux and as it
locks the OS from running any other programs you might
as well run Terman93 (AN-
I already have my BPL buster up and running right now.
It's called a 10-meter beacon! You will only need a
Tech plus license at a minimum and no coronation
requirements to put up a low power slow speed CW
signal with a basic dipole antenna, a very cheap AM CB
radio, and some way to key the PTT swi
Dave,
The ability of the software that you requested has arrived. SCAMP will
DEFINITELY not TX if the channel is busy with anything!
Sometimes it almost seems too protective:) Since it is a wide BW mode, a
tiny and weak CW signal, which just happens to be about two KC above the
dial freq, has be
I use my KAM frequently; WinWarbler lets me run MMTTY and the KAM
simultaneously, providing diversity decoding of one signal, or the
ability to copy both a DX station and his/her pileup.
I also have a PK232 and an STSII-e; I use the latter for Pactor, and
(rarely and somewhat perversely) PSK31.
"Qualified" is a characteristic of the software application used to
run a semi-automatic station.
A qualified application can detect that a frequency is already in use
by a QSO in any of several common amateur HF modes: CW, SSB, RTTY,
PSK, MFSK, Olivia, Pactor, etc; if such an application recei
That's two messages in a row inveighing against modern-day Luddites
holding back bandwidth-based allocation without citation of anyone
actually taking this position.
Perhaps this is another example of "If you hold a weak position,
attack an imaginary enemy".
The true obstacle to bandwidth-based
I still have not one but two, neither of which is hooked up at the moment,
and havent been for the past several years. Why bother with them, when we
have perfectly good computer soundboards they do the job. Someday, I may
get into a situation where I dont have internet capability, and will have
And while you are at it...
Ask how many work such modes as Packet, Amtor, Pactor
and RTTY * WITH * a TNC ... I for one would love to see just
how many even own a TNC.. (guess <5%)
Let's see the big picture here.
At 03:19 PM 2/20/05, you wrote:
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. H
I knew about *those* Luddites, Andy; I was wondering to whom Howard
was referring in drawing his analogy.
But thanks for the excellent overview...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "obrienaj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "
Could we not use highly inflammatory comments such as calling other hams
"Luddites"? There are NO luddite hams that I have found. There can be
differing viewpoints on what types of operation have value to a given
individual.
Remember that the luddite term referred to people who were employed in
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S. White"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howard
Why don't you start a poll and see just how many on this group
(under FCC regulations) would be in favor of what you suport.
By the way, are you active on the various modes that this reflector
encoura
What's the difference between a " "non qualified automatic modes "
and " qualified automatic modes " ?
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" width="200"
Thanks for the historical perspective.. I am fortunate enough to have studied
English History many years ago where I learned the term... Luddites are those
"who distrusts or fears the inevitable changes brought about by new
technology" and in the end "the Luddite Movement ceased to be active"
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Just who are these Luddites you're so fond of attacking, Howard?
Finally, an chance to use the information from those seemingly
useless history classes I endured while frowning up in the UK.
Andy K3UK
>Fro
Just who are these Luddites you're so fond of attacking, Howard? In no
discussion here or elsewhere have I seen anyone argue against the
position
"we should eliminate government enforcement of mode-based frequency
allocations".
Opposition to proposals like the ARRL's that eliminate mode-based
Anybody have an idea what the 1,700 hz wide signal is on 10.139.500?
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
http://dxcluster.blogspot.com";>http://feeds.feedburner.com/DigitalSpotter.gif"; height="67" width="200"
style="border:0" alt="Digital Spotter"/>
Yaho
44 matches
Mail list logo
