I was pretty sure the shift was 170, but just got e-mail confirmation
back from the ham who was one of the main guys who set up the repeater
and he confirmed we used 170 Hz.
I would be very surprised if any RTTY repeaters still exist since packet
was so much better and could do so much more.
7
Rick
What was the shift used? In the St. Louis area there
was a 146.10 .70 repeater that used 850Hz shift.
Since I have not lived in the area for some 20 years now
I have no guess if it's still on the air.
Hi Jerry,
The repeater was located on a farmer's silo on a ridge somewhere between
Trempealeau, WI and Winona, MN from what I recall. I did not have any
problem hitting it with modest power and antenna from Onalaska, WI. It
had pretty good coverage.
The one thing about regenerative repeaters i
Rick,
Was that regenerative repeater in the Chicago area?
I remember someone used to send text "pictures" on one night. I have
one left that I sent to my father, it was a semi-truck and the title
was "Keep On Trucking". But the paper is getting brittle and falling
apart. Had a Teletype Model 1
I found that VHF ASCII to be just as good a mode as RTTY and it provided for
better print without switching between caps and numbers. I ran VHF ASCII at
300
BAUD and 1200 baudbut that was 20 years ago.
Walt/K5YFW
va7s wrote:
> just curious anyone interested in trying vhf rtty
>
>
> Ian
This was something we did in the early 1980's prior to packet radio.
Even my homebrew TU worked well on VHF RTTY compared with its dismal
performance on HF. We had an active contingent of local hams who used
RTTY on meters. In fact, they even built and maintained a regenerative
RTTY repeater w
Sure ..but if I hear VA7-land on 2 metres I'll eat my rig!
Andy K3UK
On 2/25/07, va7s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just curious anyone interested in trying vhf rtty
Ian VA7SW
--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com
just curious anyone interested in trying vhf rtty
Ian VA7SW
