Okay now for all users to read and notice
First of all @jose : no I am not crazy, but all users should know what your
soft does EXACTLY>>>
For the rest of the world:
There are 2 exe in the ros folder
Ros(versxyz).exe is doing the on air things and the emailreport
Adifdata.exe is connecting
M
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
Andy
You make a lot more sense than some of the children in this group who want
to just whine to the FCC and ARRL.
On 7/15/10 6:15 PM, "Andy obrien" wrote:
The comment in parenthesis in nu
Andy
You make a lot more sense than some of the children in this group who want
to just whine to the FCC and ARRL.
On 7/15/10 6:15 PM, "Andy obrien" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> The comment in parenthesis in number 8 are the comments that reflect my view
> of why this fine software and mode a
OK Sigi.
I am not going to repeat my suggestion how to get Jose Ros to fix it.
Was told I became globally hated for doing so.
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Siegfried Jackstien
>Sent: Jul 15, 2010 2:34 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: AW: [digit
The comment in parenthesis in number 8 are the comments that reflect my view
of why this fine software and mode are not worth the hassle.
Andy K3UK
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jim, N1SZ wrote:
>
>
> Dave & All,
>
>
>
> No, I was thinking the same thing. Let’s take a look at some signif
ehalf Of Dave Wright
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 4:45 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
Why would anyone want to use any version of this software?
Which is better; the software that sends out false reports that you can
block, or the so
x27;t talk to each other!
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Siegfried Jackstien
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM
> Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question
>
> All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta)
Everyone better use V1.0 then, or we shall end up using different versions that
don't talk to each other!
- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Jackstien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:34 PM
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] New question
All ros spots are bogus . or almost all ... most of them wrong
Sad as I know jose could make it better
@rein you should keep the old 1.0 cause that is the last one with a
blockable adifdata exe
All versions after the first 1.0 (the new 1.0, 470beta and 471 beta) close
after a while if adifdat
PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
>
>Hi Rain
>
>I meant on this forum ;)
>
>la5vna Steinar
>
>
>
>
>On 14.07.2010 18:20, rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>> Hello Steinar,
>>
>> It is gaining in usage a
here needs to like it though.
And then how can I like something that I can't use?
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Moore
>Sent: Jul 14, 2010 1:09 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
>
>What are you basing tha
Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference.
I for one, thought it would, wrong again!
Amateur Radio a la 2010
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: Steinar Aanesland
>Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New
ateur Radio a la 2010
>
> 73 Rein W6SZ
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
>> From: Steinar Aanesland
>> Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM
>> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
>>
>> Hello friend
italradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question
>
>Hello friends,
>
>I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
>mode now.
>He doesn't deserve that much attention.
>
>la5vna Steinar
>
>
>
>
>
>
&
Hello friends,
I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS
mode now.
He doesn't deserve that much attention.
la5vna Steinar
On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote:
> Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his
> website?
>
>
> On
Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his
website?
On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote:
> Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
> agent at FCC:
>
> "ROS is not "Spread Spectrum" because the 3khz HF standard channel is
> maintaine
Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom
agent at FCC:
"ROS is not "Spread Spectrum" because the 3khz HF standard channel is
maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
techniques."
I do not know who wrote it.
What is the problem with it?
73 Rein
17 matches
Mail list logo
