On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:03:54 -0500
"taii...@gmx.com" wrote:
> On 11/14/2017 04:19 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> > To me, these prices look more like a 'polite' extortion for the
> > 'obsessed' and gullible.
> I can't understand as to why everyone always compares the pricing to
> that of a dai
On 11/14/2017 04:19 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
To me, these prices look more like a 'polite' extortion for the
'obsessed' and gullible.
I can't understand as to why everyone always compares the pricing to
that of a daily browsing computer and not intel/amd's high end server
offerings where the
Quote from Steve Litt:
<<
We all have our priorities, and for each of us, money's one of them.
I'm not willing to pay $4800.00 for a computer that eliminates every
last attack vector.
>>
I think, this neatly summarises the sentiments of many users of
GNU/Linux. These prices are too hefty for man
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:25:31 -0500
"taii...@gmx.com" wrote:
> Of course - which is why I mentioned the x86-64 D8 and D16 - which
> while slower than POWER 9 are still quite fast with a $40 16 core
> CPU. You could build a complete setup for around $500 - at least I
> did.
Noww you're speaki
On 11/12/2017 09:06 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:03:32 -0500
"taii...@gmx.com" wrote:
In case you don't notice my reply (but please keep replies on the ML
so everyone sees :D)
OK, here it is...
On 11/09/2017 12:32 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
[snip]
After Rick's posted Minix on
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:03:32 -0500
"taii...@gmx.com" wrote:
> In case you don't notice my reply (but please keep replies on the ML
> so everyone sees :D)
OK, here it is...
>
> On 11/09/2017 12:32 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
[snip]
> > After Rick's posted Minix on Intel article, I'm going to stick