On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:15:51 -0300
Claudio Roberto Prateat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
You have example of the dovecot-ldap.conf for authenticate in active
directory 2003 r2 ?
I have squid, apache authenticate in active directory, but dovecot return
failed.
Help, please...
Lets
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 10:12 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
TS TS BTW. Does anyone have better naming ideas than uiddir? I'll
commit it
TS TS to CVS HEAD once I'm sure about the name. :)
..
Or cydir showing its Cyrus like roots?
cydir it is then. Committed to CVS HEAD if someone wants to play
Hi,
in order to solve rhbz#170960 [1], I split the sql drivers to plugins so that
they are loaded dynamically and can be split to separate packages.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170960
The patches are here:
[2]
Charles Marcus wrote:
Biffy Bob wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am getting an error message on FreeBSD 4 after I install dovecot.
To start off, I create two regular users, testuser and testuser1.
Hi Bob,
You might get a response if you provided a bit more info that might
help, like, maybe...
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc29.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc29.tar.gz.sig
Probably one more RC after this.
* Security fix: If zlib plugin was loaded, it was possible to open
gzipped mbox files outside the user's mail directory.
+ Added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc29.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc29.tar.gz.sig
Probably one more RC after this.
* Security fix: If zlib plugin was loaded, it was possible to open
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 17:46 +0200, Daniel wrote:
Hi!
I have this problem with cvs (1.0 branch):
[...]
Making all in wiki
make: don't know how to make \n. Stop
Did you run autogen.sh so that it downloads the doc/wiki/ contents?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:01:35PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'd like to make it possible to use some configure option to decide what
plugins should be compiled directly into binaries and what should be
installed as plugins. So that's the long term plan.
I think I may rework that patch
2007. March 30. 18:13, Timo Sirainen:
On 30.3.2007, at 19.03, Daniel wrote:
2007. March 30. 17:58, Timo Sirainen:
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 17:46 +0200, Daniel wrote:
Hi!
I have this problem with cvs (1.0 branch):
[...]
Making all in wiki
make: don't know how to make \n. Stop
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:47:30PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
HI Timo,
you added the wiki in txt format to the docs dir,
this again brokes my suse spec *g
What annoys me more (as dovecot maintainer for pkgsrc) is that the example
config file changes with (almost) every release. The
Le 30.03.2007 18:23, Geert Hendrickx a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:47:30PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
HI Timo,
you added the wiki in txt format to the docs dir,
this again brokes my suse spec *g
What annoys me more (as dovecot maintainer for pkgsrc) is that the example
config
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
What annoys me more (as dovecot maintainer for pkgsrc) is that the example
config file changes with (almost) every release. The changes are mostly
just in comments, but it makes users have to merge their configuration on
every update.
What part of Release Candidate
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:35:09PM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
What part of Release Candidate isn't clear here... ;-)
release candidate equals latest supported release in this case as well.
If they were 2.0 rc's, I'd continue running the latest 1.whatever release
until done.
Geert
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 07:35:40PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I hate how badly the configuration file updating works everywhere (well,
or at least in Debian). If the changes don't really change any existing
settings and won't conflict with the modified parts of the config file,
there's no
On Thursday 29 March 2007 19:15, Emiliano Gabrielli (aka AlberT) wrote:
it's attached ...
tomorrow i'll compile and try the rc29 ...
just tried rc29 .. nothing changed for me ..
Any suggestion ?
--
?php echo ' Emiliano Gabrielli (aka AlberT) ',\n,
'GrUSP founder -
On Wednesday 28 Mar 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I cannot get per-user quotas put in the relevant field of the
userdb to work. They appear to be completely ignored; only the
setting from /etc/dovecot.conf is applied.
How exactly do you set it in the passwd-file? You need to set it as
Hi Timo et al,
On 29 Mar 2007, at 17:52, Mike Brudenell wrote:
But then the ODDNESS starts. I'm still a little hazy how to
interpret the output of imaptest, but every now and then one or two
processes stall for several seconds. When this happens activity
seems to grow quieter in the
Hi all,
After looking at the LDA/Sendmail page in the dovecot wiki, I wanted
to contribute another method to easily configure Sendmail to use
deliver. Instead of adding a new mailer definition, as already
suggested, one can simply use the following line in their sendmail.mc
file instead:
Hi all...
The prefetch entry in the wiki says:
If you're using Dovecot's local delivery agent, you'll still need a
valid userdb which it can use to locate the users. You can do this by
adding a normal sql/ldap userdb after userdb prefetch.
(http://wiki.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/Prefetch)
My
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:05:55PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
A few new small features and lots of index/mbox fixes. I've been heavily
stress testing this release, so I think it should be about perfect. :)
*Features*?! In an rc?! No wonder there's no convergence.
[snip]
So please, no
On March 30, 2007 4:05:55 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On Friday, March 30, 2007 3:24 PM -0700 Frank Cusack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I'm still using 0.99. The RC's still look like betas and I
have no idea which one (if any) is less a regression than any other.
On March 30, 2007 7:31:15 PM -0400 Dean Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:05:55PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
A few new small features and lots of index/mbox fixes. I've been
heavily stress testing this release, so I think it should be about
perfect. :)
--On Friday, March 30, 2007 4:41 PM -0700 Frank Cusack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are going to have to do the exact same testing from 0.99-1.0 as
you would from 0.99-1.0rc29. Caveat emptor with open source software;
the responsibility is upon YOU to do your own testing.
Actually, no. A
--On Friday, March 30, 2007 4:52 PM -0700 Frank Cusack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's very easy. In the dovecot world, rc means development version.
Or are you too stupid and ignorant to learn how the versioning works
for dovecot. (Sorry, that's directed to another dovecot thread; I'm
not
On March 30, 2007 5:04:58 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On Friday, March 30, 2007 4:52 PM -0700 Frank Cusack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's very easy. In the dovecot world, rc means development version.
Or are you too stupid and ignorant to learn how the versioning works
--On Friday, March 30, 2007 5:22 PM -0700 Frank Cusack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't mistake my email for any involvement with dovecot
development. AFAIK, Timo is the one and only developer. That's sure to
win over your board and boards worldwide.
If you mean a single developer
Quoting Dean Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have to agree with you on this. I'm relatively new with Dovecot and
have been evaluating it for deployment in a production environment. I
must say that Dovecot has the most unusual development method of a
large-scale project I've seen.
I've seen
Quoting Kenneth Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's fine for isolated users supporting only themselves. But it won't
win any mind share in the boardroom. If you want widespread deployment
to get proper testing (and hence a larger user base) you need a version
number that gives business people the
On 2007 Mar 30 (Fri) at 20:56:43 -0700 (-0700), Kenneth Porter wrote:
:--On Friday, March 30, 2007 8:26 PM -0700 Peter Hessler
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:This sort of decision is exactly why I'm the mail admin and they are
:not. They know things at the boardroom level, and they are
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:05 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Friday, March 30, 2007 3:24 PM -0700 Frank Cusack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why I'm still using 0.99. The RC's still look like betas and I
have no idea which one (if any) is less a regression than any other.
They ARE
30 matches
Mail list logo
