Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot crash in 1.0.13

2008-05-20 Thread Peter Eriksson
Timo Sirainen wrote: > On May 20, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Peter Eriksson wrote: > >> It's always the same user causing these "Out of memory" errors >> (unlikely since this machine has 8GB of RAM and XXGB of swap >> and typically has plenty of memory free. His maildir directory is >> 1.4GB in size. >>

Re: [Dovecot] Disallow folder delete

2008-05-20 Thread Kenneth Porter
It might be nice to have a mode that disallows deletion of *non-empty* folders. In order for a user to delete the folder, the folder must first be emptied and purged. Alas, deleting messages can be undone, but folders can't be, and the UI of a client doesn't necessarily make this obvious.

Re: [Dovecot] Disallow folder delete

2008-05-20 Thread Kenneth Porter
On Tuesday, May 20, 2008 8:39 AM -0700 Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I usually make users wait a while before restoring their mistakes. A few hours of thinking about it might make them think about it Assuming it was a mistake. How long do you then wait in turn before he gives you yo

Re: [Dovecot] Running sieve filters on already delivered mails

2008-05-20 Thread Axel Gembe
Jens Dönhoff wrote: > RTFWiki! () Thank you! I looked in the wiki for quite a long time, but it seems not long enough :\ - Axel

Re: [Dovecot] Running sieve filters on already delivered mails

2008-05-20 Thread Jens Dönhoff
--On Tuesday, May 20, 2008 10:00:54 PM +0200 Axel Gembe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want to know what the best way to run sieve filters on already delivered mail is. RTFWiki! () Greetings, Jens

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot crash in 1.0.13

2008-05-20 Thread Timo Sirainen
On May 20, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Peter Eriksson wrote: It's always the same user causing these "Out of memory" errors (unlikely since this machine has 8GB of RAM and XXGB of swap and typically has plenty of memory free. His maildir directory is 1.4GB in size. Hmm... He seems to have a *huge* T

[Dovecot] Running sieve filters on already delivered mails

2008-05-20 Thread Axel Gembe
I want to know what the best way to run sieve filters on already delivered mail is. Problem is that I have a rather large unfiltered mailbox and filtering it by hand would be a PITA. I don't mind coding something up to do this, but I just don't think that I'm the first one with this problem. Thank

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot crash in 1.0.13

2008-05-20 Thread Peter Eriksson
Noticed some more stuff this time: May 20 19:37:38 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(joher): block_alloc(): Out of memory May 20 19:37:38 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 961074 mail.error] child 10772 (imap) returned error 83 (Out of memory) May 20 19:40:47 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot crash in 1.0.13

2008-05-20 Thread Peter Eriksson
No core dump for now. Core dump backtrace got now: (dbx) where [1] __lwp_kill(0x0, 0x6, 0x100082ee8, 0x19d4e0, 0x0, 0x0), at 0x7e9ceab8 [2] raise(0x6, 0x0, 0x, 0x7eae6000, 0x0, 0x0), at 0x7e96b434 [3] abort(0x1, 0x1b8, 0x100082ee8, 0x19d4e0, 0x0

Re: [Dovecot] Disallow folder delete

2008-05-20 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-20-2008 6:43 AM Jacek Osiecki spake the following: On Tue, 20 May 2008, mouss wrote: Kenneth Porter wrote: On Monday, May 19, 2008 9:43 PM -0400 Charles Marcus > Thats pretty drastic - I'd have a rebellion on my hands if I tried that were that to happen. Most users aren't that sophist

Re: [Dovecot] Disallow folder delete

2008-05-20 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-19-2008 4:07 PM Kenneth Porter spake the following: Is there a straightforward way to disallow the deletion of all IMAP mailboxes? I have a user who's deleted an important IMAP mailbox and I'm now recovering a recent copy from the backup. But I'd rather just blanket disallow all folder d

Re: [Dovecot] Cannot compile current version of antispam

2008-05-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: Thanks for the reminder, Chris Boyle had sent me a bugfix for this a week ago that I had so far neglected to apply, I have done that now. Yep, it compiles, thanks! - -- Steffen Kaiser -BEGIN PGP SIG

Re: [Dovecot] Cannot compile current version of antispam

2008-05-20 Thread Johannes Berg
> with the current (2008-05-20) repository releases of Dovecot-1.0 and > antispam the plugin no longer compiles: > > antispam-storage-1.0.c: In function âantispam_mail_update_keywordsâ: > antispam-storage-1.0.c:285: error: âidxkwd__typeâ undeclared (first use in > this function) > antispam-stor

[Dovecot] Cannot compile current version of antispam

2008-05-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, with the current (2008-05-20) repository releases of Dovecot-1.0 and antispam the plugin no longer compiles: antispam-storage-1.0.c: In function âantispam_mail_update_keywordsâ: antispam-storage-1.0.c:285: error: âidxkwd__typeâ undeclared (

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot crash in 1.0.13

2008-05-20 Thread Peter Eriksson
Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:29 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote: > >> May 14 11:46:51 ifm.liu.se dovecot: [ID 107833 mail.error] IMAP(joher): >> file maildir-uidlist.c: line 143: assertion failed: (UIDLIS >> T_IS_LOCKED(uidlist)) > > If this still hapens with 1.0.13, it would hel

Re: [Dovecot] New ManageSieve releases: v0.10.2 for Dovecot 1.1.rc4 and v9.3 for Dovecot 1.0.13

2008-05-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 4 May 2008, Stephan Bosch wrote: * Fixed bug that caused SASL mechanisms that require more than a single client response to fail. Reported by Steffen Kaiser and occured when he tried using the (obsolete) LOGIN mechanism. Ancient :)

Re: [Dovecot] Disallow folder delete

2008-05-20 Thread Jacek Osiecki
On Tue, 20 May 2008, mouss wrote: Kenneth Porter wrote: On Monday, May 19, 2008 9:43 PM -0400 Charles Marcus > Thats pretty drastic - I'd have a rebellion on my hands if I tried that were that to happen. Most users aren't that sophisticated and aren't creating folders in the first place. (

Re: [Dovecot] Disallow folder delete

2008-05-20 Thread mouss
Kenneth Porter wrote: On Monday, May 19, 2008 9:43 PM -0400 Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thats pretty drastic - I'd have a rebellion on my hands if I tried that here. The userbase is small, and I'd even be willing to set this up for one user were that to happen. Most users aren