Hello, Stan,
> This is why I recommended mbox in the first place. If your only writes
> to these mailbox files are appends of new messages, mbox is the best
> format by far. It's faster at appending than any other format, and it's
> faster for searching than any other.
I now seriously consider
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:15:02 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 16.11.2011, at 3.04, Micah Anderson wrote:
>
> > I'm looking at scripting a mechanism to delete a mailbox, which is easy
> > with 'doveadm mailbox delete' -- however it gets complicated when there
> > are children of arbitrary depth, f
Hi,
>> procmail: Assigning "DELIVER=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
>> procmail: Executing "/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver,-m,xspamtest"
>> procmail: Non-zero exitcode (75) from "/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
>> procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded
>> procmail: Executing "/usr/libexec/dovecot
On 16.11.2011, at 3.04, Micah Anderson wrote:
> I'm looking at scripting a mechanism to delete a mailbox, which is easy
> with 'doveadm mailbox delete' -- however it gets complicated when there
> are children of arbitrary depth, for example, I may have this:
>
> restored.daily1.INBOX
> restored.d
I'm looking at scripting a mechanism to delete a mailbox, which is easy
with 'doveadm mailbox delete' -- however it gets complicated when there
are children of arbitrary depth, for example, I may have this:
restored.daily1.INBOX
restored.daily1.Sent
restored.daily1.Mystuff
restored.daily1.Mystuff
On 16.11.2011, at 2.08, Alex wrote:
> No, I was just running as root from the command-line for an example.
> The maillog shows error 75:
>
> procmail: Assigning "DELIVER=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver"
> procmail: Executing "/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver,-m,xspamtest"
> procmail: Non-zero exitcode (
Hi,
>> It's now delivering, but my deliver command must be wrong. This is my
>> ~/.procmailrc:
> ..
>> # # /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -m spamtest
>> lda(root): Fatal: destination user parameter (-d user) not given
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Is it trying to deliver mails to root user?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 10:23 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
>
>> > Thanks to a fortuitously unrelated thread ("how to disable quota for
>> > second namespace"), I got the quota part figured out and that seems to
>> > be working: Add a second entr
On 16.11.2011, at 2.00, Alex wrote:
> It's now delivering, but my deliver command must be wrong. This is my
> ~/.procmailrc:
..
> # # /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -m spamtest
> lda(root): Fatal: destination user parameter (-d user) not given
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
Is it trying to delive
Hi,
I just don't understand how to invoke procmail from deliver.
>>>
>>> The idea was to invoke deliver from procmail. I still do this myself
>>> since I haven't bothered changing my procmail scripts to Sieve:
>>>
>>> DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
>>>
>>> :0
>>> * ^List-Id.*dovec
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 16.11.2011, at 0.48, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> > Today I note there are 38 imap-logins that seem to be stale on our staff
> > imap server,
> > they do not seem to die off, new imap-logins are created with new logins
> > and exit accordingl
On 16.11.2011, at 0.48, Nick Edwards wrote:
> Today I note there are 38 imap-logins that seem to be stale on our staff
> imap server,
> they do not seem to die off, new imap-logins are created with new logins
> and exit accordingly.
..
> Dovecot version 1.2.17, built from source
All this code ha
Hiya,
Today I note there are 38 imap-logins that seem to be stale on our staff
imap server,
they do not seem to die off, new imap-logins are created with new logins
and exit accordingly.
Now, these are from our monitoring software that runs on another server on
our LAN. Our corporate link was t
On 16.11.2011, at 0.14, Alex wrote:
>>> I just don't understand how to invoke procmail from deliver.
>>
>> The idea was to invoke deliver from procmail. I still do this myself
>> since I haven't bothered changing my procmail scripts to Sieve:
>>
>> DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
>>
Hi,
>> I just don't understand how to invoke procmail from deliver.
>
> The idea was to invoke deliver from procmail. I still do this myself
> since I haven't bothered changing my procmail scripts to Sieve:
>
> DELIVER=/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver
>
> :0
> * ^List-Id.*dovecot.dovecot.org
> |
Thanks for the response.
I was able to get it working with
chmod 755
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:04 -0500, Chris Young wrote:
> > I am familiar with this article
> > http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA#multipleuids
> >
> > I want to disable setuid-ro
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:24 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> When a user renames their username, I am using dsync to copy their mail
> over to the new username's mail location[0].
>
> Some of the dsyncs are failing with errors that I dont know how to work
> with, for example:
>
> dsync(): Error: T
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:31 -0500, Mark Goldey wrote:
Could you do a bit more with gdb and this core:
> #1 0x08059890 in auth_worker_handle_user (client=0x82b34d0) at
> auth-worker-client.c:405
> auth_request = 0x82b56e8
> userdb_id = 1
fr 1
p *auth_request->userdb->userdb
p *au
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 20:43 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen :
> > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 15:13 +0100, Tobias Hachmer wrote:
> >
> > > is there a way to use Dovecot SASL Authentication for submission on a
> > > different machine dovecot runs?
> >
> > With v2.0 you should be abl
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:04 -0500, Chris Young wrote:
> I am familiar with this article
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA#multipleuids
>
> I want to disable setuid-root, but I don't know the default group and
> permissions.
>
> sudo chgrp root /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda
> sudo chmod 00750 /usr/
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 00:30 -0800, Mark Hanford wrote:
> I've got a centos 6 server running Dovecot 2.0.beta6 (3156315704ef).
> For legacy reasons (I'm moving mail from a Dovecot 1.1.1 and FreeBSD box
> with user home directories NFS mounted), my index files are setup to be
> in /u/indexes/
>
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 10:40 +0100, wwl wrote:
> Hello Group,
>
> is it possible to Limit the number of pop/imap requests to Dovecot?
>
> I read the Wiki and found
>
>max_mail_processes = 512
>
> is this the way to limit this ?
This limits the number of simultaneous IMAP and POP3 connection
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 12:14 +0100, David Ocana wrote:
> >> namespace {
> >>separator = /
> >>prefix = INBOX/
> >>location =
> >> mbox:/var/empty:INBOX=/mail/%d/%n:INDEX=/var/dovecot/%d/%n
> >>inbox = yes
> >>hidden = yes
> >> }
> >>
> >> plugin {
> >>
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:59 -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
> I really like the feature where you can define quota rules with percents
> which trigger off of the default values[0] (so you can set the Trash to
> allow for 10% more of the user's quota for example).
>
> What I would really love in dove
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:41 -0800, Peter Williams wrote:
> I think I've encountered a bug in Dovecot 2.0.9 (as provided on CentOS
> 6).
>
> According to the doveadm-search-query(7) manual page, a "mailbox"
> specification can only come at the beginning of a search query.
It doesn't exactly say
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 12:58 +0530, Rajeev Sharma wrote:
> I am using vpopmail,qmail along with courier-imap 4.0 i want to
> migrate from courier to dovecot but i have 100 shared folder
> under /home/vpopmail/domains/domain.com/Malidir and user shared them
> on the basis of rights assign.
>
> I am
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 05:32 +0100, Bambero wrote:
> I configured dovecot to use submission smtp host becouse of chroot.
>
> submission_host = 127.0.0.1
>
> Unfortunatelly:
>
> Nov 12 05:11:15 myhost exim[23366]: 2011-11-12 05:11:15 SMTP protocol
> synchronization error (next input sent too soon
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 17:25 +0100, Bambero wrote:
> all maildirs are located in: /var/mail/j...@example.com/Maildir
So this is /var/mail/%u/Maildir template.
> namespace {
> type = shared
> separator = /
> prefix = shared/%%u/
> location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 10:23 -0800, Mark Moseley wrote:
> > Thanks to a fortuitously unrelated thread ("how to disable quota for
> > second namespace"), I got the quota part figured out and that seems to
> > be working: Add a second entry to plugin {}, e.g. "quota2 =
> > maildir:Archive quota:ns=IN
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 13:09 -0500, Alex wrote:
>
> > Yes, you can pipe the message to the Dovecot LDA from procmail. This would
> > be similar to the solution described above, only using Procmail instead of a
> > shell script.
>
> Are you referring to doing something like this:
>
> http://wiki2.
Folks:
I've been running Dovecot 2.0.7 on a Qmail / Vpopmail installation built
on Debian Squeeze, with no problems for about a year. Dovecot is used
for IMAP/S auth only.
Dovecot is built from source. I just upgraded to 2.0.15 but it
segfaults whenever an IMAP auth is attempted, regardless of
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 03:58 +, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Appears this is the problem - I found this for dovecot v2 and it seems to be
> working fine:
>
> http://sourceforge.jp/projects/dovecot2-drac/
>
> Might wanna make a note on the wiki page that the DRAC setup is only for
> dovecot 1.x?
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 16:02 +0100, Urban Loesch wrote:
> At the beginning of our migration we didn't set the "pop3_reuse_xuidl"
> configuration option to yes.
> Do you know what happens when we activate the "pop3_reuse_xuidl" option on
> our running dovecot?
>
> Will Dovecot change the uidl val
When a user renames their username, I am using dsync to copy their mail
over to the new username's mail location[0].
Some of the dsyncs are failing with errors that I dont know how to work
with, for example:
dsync(): Error: Trying to open a non-listed mailbox with
guid=41fcd40303c8a64e4323
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 12:26 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> This is why I recommended mbox in the first place. If your only writes
> to these mailbox files are appends of new messages, mbox is the best
> format by far. It's faster at appending than any other format, and it's
> faster for searching
On 11/14/2011 3:16 PM, Alexander Chekalin wrote:
> Locking issues on mbox is the reason for my long-lasting love affair with
> maildir,
Same reason most others fell in love with it. Many now want to divorce
maildir, as the cost of the storage to maintain acceptable performance
is now too high.
Hi,
>>> The Sieve language doesn't support invoking external programs. You can
>>> execute this program before Sieve, for instance by wrapping the LDA
>>> invocation.
>>
>> Can you describe how I might do this?
>
> You can write a shell script that is executed from your MTA instead of the
> Doveco
Op 15-11-2011 16:38, Alex schreef:
Hi,
The Sieve language doesn't support invoking external programs. You can
execute this program before Sieve, for instance by wrapping the LDA
invocation.
Can you describe how I might do this?
You can write a shell script that is executed from your MTA inst
Hi,
>> I have a number of procmail scripts and I've converted them to sieve,
>> but they didn't convert very well. Can someone show me how to convert
>> the following:
>>
>> :0
>> {
>> :0 fhW
>> | /home/alex/bin/process-mail.pl
>> }
>>
>> The script skipped right over that.
>
> The Sieve l
Hi,
we are in migration progress from Communigate Pro 5.0.x to Dovecot 2.0.15 with
mdbox.
We still migrated about 25.000 IMAP accounts from CGP to Dovecot.
Also there were still added about 2000 new POP3 Accounts on Dovecot.
Now we must migrate about 10.000 POP3 accounts from CGP to Dovecot.
On 2011-11-14 10:58 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
Might wanna make a note on the wiki page that the DRAC setup is only for
dovecot 1.x?
Why? You were on the wiki for v1, so obviously it is (or may be) only
meant for v1.
--
Best regards,
Charles
41 matches
Mail list logo
