[e-gold-list] Re: First ZKS, now PGP (Network Associates)

2001-10-12 Thread Ian Green
on 13/10/2001 9:21 am, Julian Morrison at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What amazes me is that hushmail has survived their disastrous "version > 2" release which needs one specific patchlevel of internet explorer to > run at all. Before they did that, I was a fan. If only there were a > "don't wan

[e-gold-list] Re: First ZKS, now PGP (Network Associates)

2001-10-12 Thread Michael Moore
I could not run it at all and consequently missed quite few emails. However now I have msie 6.0 and the applett running it is fine. msie seems to be the correction for msie 5 series seems to me - Original Message - > "James M. Ray" wrote: > > > > http://www.nai.com/other/jump/cus

[e-gold-list] Re: First ZKS, now PGP (Network Associates)

2001-10-12 Thread Julian Morrison
"James M. Ray" wrote: > > http://www.nai.com/other/jump/customer-faq.asp > > It's interesting (to me, anyway...) that Hushmail somehow finds > a way to survive. It's probably just a coincidence Hush accepts > e-gold -- and was the only one that ever did, right? ;^) What amazes me is that hushma