Well, I tried to write a message for the Emacs developers and pretesters
lists, but could not manage to write anything that would make sense. I
suspect that we (ar at least it's me) do not have ideas clear enough to
be explained outside of here.
In fact, I do not manage to make a resume of
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Pete Forman wrote:
> Daniel Pittman writes:
> > As such, I want to propose an alternate tag to indicate our own
> > paths:
> >
> >"/!/"
[...]
> I agree with you but would like to take it further. How about
> reworking the whole syntax along these lines.
>
> /![@en
On 13 Mar 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> "Pete" == Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> /![@enc]/:telnet://[usr[:pwd]@]host1[:port]/ssh://host2/:/path/to/file
> [...]
>> F tramp-prefix-authority"//:" or "#"
>
> Clearly ""//:"" won't do since Emacs tends to interpret it directly.
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
>> As such, I want to propose an alternate tag to indicate our own
>> paths:
>>
>>"/!/"
>
>Seconded.
>
> I still do not like it at all. It's completely different from anything
> that is done out there. There is a quasi-stand
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
> I agree with Francesco. I don't like "/!/" at all.
The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at all.
> First off, I have to use the shift key to type the exclamation point.
So, pick something different. "/tramp/" is available.
On 13 Mar 2001, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> "Francesco" == Francesco Potorti` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Emacs should have a general hook for /[^/]+:.* filenames, where [^/]+
>> is the protocol. Then, different packages could register to that hook
>> and tell it which protocol they do manage.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> Well, I tried to write a message for the Emacs developers and
> pretesters lists, but could not manage to write anything that would
> make sense.
I am happy to offer what help I can. I would like to see a good solution
to the issue forged.
> I su
On 14 Mar 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
>
>> In the long run, perhaps. But if we think that this is The Right
>> Thing, then we should make this discussion go public, and at least
>> hear from others.
>
> I think RMS has said he wants it, if somebo
On 15-Mar-2001, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
>> I agree with Francesco. I don't like "/!/" at all.
> The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at all.
Yes, that's always been the case, but I strongly feel that the default should
be wisely
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
> On 15-Mar-2001, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
>> The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at
>> all.
>
> Yes, that's always been the case, but I strongly feel that the
> default should be wisely chosen.
Finding the default shouldn't ke
>>> The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at all.
>> Yes, that's always been the case, but I strongly feel that the
>> default should be wisely chosen.
> Finding the default shouldn't keep Daniel from implementing it, I
> think. After all, this is the development version!
I
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/tramp/lisp
In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/kai/tramp-devel/tramp/lisp
Modified Files:
tramp.el ChangeLog
Log Message:
(tramp-methods, tramp-telnet-args): New method
parameter `tramp-telnet-args'.
(tramp-get-telnet-args): New function.
(t
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/tramp/texi
In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/kai/tramp-devel/tramp/texi
Modified Files:
.cvsignore
Log Message:
Ignore *.vrs.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
> It's nice to say that users can customize the tramp prefix if they
> want to, but the reality is that few people will customize it.
All I'm saying it's enough to choose wisely before going stable :-)
Of course you're right, except for the `easy to t
I have now added the `tramp-telnet-args' method parameter, similar to
all the other foo-args method parameters. However, I haven't tested
this.
Some of you wanted this. I think Harry and Ted? Could you please
test this version? (New version in CVS, head branch, not stable.)
kai
--
Be indisc
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
> On 15-Mar-2001, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
>>> I agree with Francesco. I don't like "/!/" at all.
>> The prefix will be changeable, using custom, with no trouble at all.
>
> Yes, that's always been the case,
On 14 Mar 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
>
>> On 15-Mar-2001, Daniel Pittman wrote:
[...]
>>> It's hard to support, requires hacking the innards of other
>>> packages and introduces load-order dependencies in the packages.
>>
>> Correct me if I'm wron
17 matches
Mail list logo
