1989 --
===
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Greg (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Bad Mime decode?
Thanks for the reply. The boundry was part of my munging.
It looks like Interscan is having it's way with som
Subject: RE: Bad Mime decode?
Thanks for the reply. The boundry was part of my munging.
It looks like Interscan is having it's way with some of these messages.
I
wonder why it seems to work with so much other mail and only
occasionally
goofs something up.
Any chance you would explai
ipart/alternative
and multipart/mixed?
\\Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 10:09 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Bad Mime decode?
>
>
> It's malformed. It should
quot;. If that's not a
result of your munging than that's the problem.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin, Greg (CSC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:38 AM
Subject: FW: Bad Mime dec
I have a user receiving a message from an external client and the message is
getting to Outlook with the body of the message blank. I was able to
retrieve the headers from the message and sure enough the content was in
there just not displayed by Outlook. I suspect Intercan is screwing up the
m
5 matches
Mail list logo