Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position that
you can retire from. ":
What about Edward VIII's abdication (1936) - after his involvement with that
woman Wallis Simpson?
"Not a position that you can retire from" is what they said about popes, until
Benedict
9, 2015 7:01 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Queen Elizabeth II to Set a Record?
Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position
that you can retire from. ":
What about Edward VIII's abdication (1936) - after his involvement with that
w
If you read my post, you will see that I mention, in the very next sentence
after the one you quote. the example of Edward VIII. Did you fall asleep,
s3raphita?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Re "But the queen will not "retire." Queen of England is not a position that
you can retire from. ":
What about Edward VIII's abdication (1936) - after his involvement with that
woman Wallis Simpson?
Different. He didn't
Did you fall asleep, s3raphita?
I plead guilty! I blanked that sentence out.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
If you read my post, you will see that I mention, in the very next sentence
after the one you quote. the example of Edward VIII. Did you
I think it's long been an open secret that Prince William rather than Prince
Charles will succeed to the throne. I don't think Charles wants to be king, and
it would be much more exciting for everyone involved to have a younger man.
Charles is already 67 or 68, I believe. But the queen will not