Robert T. Wyatt austin.utexas.edu> writes:
> I'm going
> to try scanning packages and indexing and will post the results after
> trying to update again.
... this did not help.
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest
[forgot to send to list]
In gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners, you said:
> Since selfupdate wasn't working on my 10.2-gcc3.3 computer at work
> (on which I only yesterday enabled the unstable trees -- and on which
> I had a working stable-tree kde installation yesterday), I tried to
> update-all. T
At 7:24 PM -0500 12/22/04, Daniel Macks wrote:
[forgot to send to list]
In gmane.os.apple.fink.beginners, you said:
Since selfupdate wasn't working on my 10.2-gcc3.3 computer at work
(on which I only yesterday enabled the unstable trees -- and on which
I had a working stable-tree kde installatio
Daniel Macks wrote:
Try installing "test-simple-pm560" (assuming '/usr/bin/perl -v'
reports itself as v5.6.0). Then see if you can update the "fink" pkg.
There is actually a bug in the error message (or rather warning)
displayed when fink doesn't find the test stuff. It says:
Bail out! Can't fin
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
But thirdly, the absence of Test::More does not (or did not for me, in
any case) prevent the complete installation of the new fink. It was not
treated as an error.
I guess the errors that have been observed come up when some version of
test-simple-pmXXX is installed, bu
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:28:45AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Martin Costabel wrote:
> []
> >But thirdly, the absence of Test::More does not (or did not for me, in
> >any case) prevent the complete installation of the new fink. It was not
> >treated as an error.
>
> I guess the errors that
At 9:03 AM +0100 12/23/04, Martin Costabel wrote:
Secondly, there is no package named "test-simple-pm" that can be installed:
% fink install test-simple-pm
Information about 3311 packages read in 4 seconds.
Failed: no version info available for test-simple-pm
% fink list test-simple-pm
Information
At 9:28 AM +0100 12/23/04, Martin Costabel wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
But thirdly, the absence of Test::More does not (or did not for me,
in any case) prevent the complete installation of the new fink. It
was not treated as an error.
I guess the errors that have been observed come up when s
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
[]
i test-simple-pm 0.47-1
This must have survived the 10.2->10.2-gcc3.3 upgrade. It only exists in
the 10.2 tree, not in 10.2-gcc3.3. The fact that it is not replaced
automatically by upgrade-all is a flaw in the present construction of
the -pm pa
At 5:26 PM +0100 12/23/04, Martin Costabel wrote:
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
[]
i test-simple-pm 0.47-1
This must have survived the 10.2->10.2-gcc3.3 upgrade. It only
exists in the 10.2 tree, not in 10.2-gcc3.3. The fact that it is not
replaced automatically by upgrade-all is
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
[]
so i could/should
apt-get remove test-simple-pm
to fix it?
Better, "fink install test-simple-pm560". This removes the old package
also, and in this way you continue participating in the bug-catching
game :-)
--
Martin
--
At 6:07 PM +0100 12/23/04, Martin Costabel wrote:
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
[]
so i could/should
apt-get remove test-simple-pm
to fix it?
Better, "fink install test-simple-pm560". This removes the old
package also, and in this way you continue participating in the
bug-catching game :-)
--
Martin
I
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
and the old package appears to be unchanged after 'fink installing' the
new one. I wonder if having the -pm560 is enough to not have to worry
about having the -pm(non-virtual-package-version).
Yes, you are right, I misread the info file: It has "Replaces:
test-simple-pm (<
At 7:05 PM +0100 12/23/04, Martin Costabel wrote:
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
and the old package appears to be unchanged after 'fink installing'
the new one. I wonder if having the -pm560 is enough to not have to
worry about having the -pm(non-virtual-package-version).
Yes, you are right, I misread t
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
[]
My system certainly believes that test-simple-pm is a buildable package
as you can see on that page.
I don't doubt this, but the thing is you *should not* have this as a
buildable package. It is not in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. So where is your
test-simple-pm-info file tha
On Thursday, December 23, 2004, at 03:55 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Robert T. Wyatt wrote:
My system certainly believes that test-simple-pm is a buildable
package as you can see on that page.
I don't doubt this, but the thing is you *should not* have this as a
buildable package. It is not in the
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
[]
Get:1 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2-gcc3.3/release/main
test-simple-pm 0.47-1 [56.6kB]
[]
I think this is evidence that it is the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree, isn't it?
It is evidence that it is in the Fink-0.6.3 binary distribution from 02
April 2004. The corresponding info fil
On Thursday, December 23, 2004, at 06:14 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
Get:1 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2-gcc3.3/release/main
test-simple-pm 0.47-1 [56.6kB]
I think this is evidence that it is the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree, isn't it?
It is evidence that it is in the Fink-0.6.3 bin
On Thursday, December 23, 2004, at 06:14 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Robert T Wyatt wrote:
[]
Get:1 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.2-gcc3.3/release/main
test-simple-pm 0.47-1 [56.6kB]
[]
I think this is evidence that it is the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree, isn't it?
It is evidence that it is in the Fink-0.6
19 matches
Mail list logo
