Christian Brunschen writes
I think you misunderstand the scenario I'm sketching at.
You seem to be suggesting a scenario with one 'main' configuration, and the
ability to focus briefly by selecting a certain part of the panel, with the
default panel resuming operation after the user 'deselects
I have found another thing that is quite interesting. May be this have
something to do with the fact that the opacity of my objects is 98%, but
FlightGear seem to have trouble displaying multiple partially transparent
objects that are overlapping one another.
For example, if I have a plane wit
Since the JSBSIM update some days ago the f16 model stopped working
properly for me. The elevator appears to be oscillating randomly, it's
seemingly in a different position for each frame update. This is
visible in the model animation and the aircraft is uncontrollable.
Does anyone else see this?
I suppose I did. I'm sorry about it. =)
Regards,
Ampere
On June 25, 2004 04:16 pm, Christian Brunschen wrote:
>
> I think you misunderstand the scenario I'm sketching at.
>
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org
On 25 Jun 2004, at 20:41, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Sorry, I should have quote this instead:
Christian Brunschen worte:
Consider an aircraft with *lots* of different things that can be
changed; including things like autopilot, radios, and so on. Rather
than having to have all possible things acce
Josh Babcock said:
> I want to write a program that, given a lat/lon, will return the ground
altitude
> ASL and the slope (strike and dip). I have poked around in the simgear and
> flightgear code a bit, and am having trouble finding where the tiles get loaded
> to use as an example. Can some
Sorry, I should have quote this instead:
Christian Brunschen worte:
> Consider an aircraft with *lots* of different things that can be
> changed; including things like autopilot, radios, and so on. Rather
> than having to have all possible things accessible from the keyboard -
> likely leading
I want to write a program that, given a lat/lon, will return the ground altitude
ASL and the slope (strike and dip). I have poked around in the simgear and
flightgear code a bit, and am having trouble finding where the tiles get loaded
to use as an example. Can someone point me in the right di
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Unfortunately RTLD_DEFAULT isn't supported on all platforms (it isn't
> supported in IRIX anyhow). I think that if what you describe is the
> problem this really is a bug at your side. What happens is that the
> function pointer is copied to ftpr. So dlcose() should never be ab
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
I came up with a similar idea a few weeks ago.
The panel will have to lost focus automatically when no input is given within
a certain time.
Regards,
Ampere
On June 25, 2004 11:17 am, Josh Babcock wrote:
Whatever we do, it should be self documenting. There should be a
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that if what you describe is the problem this really is a
> bug at your side. What happens is that the function pointer is
> copied to ftpr. So dlcose() should never be able to have any effects
> on this copy ??
erik, maybe this test program will
Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is probably no problem of not doing dlclose at all. Standard
> process exit routine should do it for us. So we could write :
>
> static void *handle = 0;
> if ( !handle )
> handle = dlopen();
> fct = dlsym();
> return fct;
or we can call dlo
Josh Babcock said:
> Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> > Modelers could perhaps build at the "aircraft specific" versions, so
> > that they are there, and the program would default to ignoring these. Users
> > who wanted the alternate versions could then deliberately enable them.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Ji
Alex Romosan wrote:
> Frederic Bouvier writes:
>
> > So, if the library is really unloaded, the pointer access should be
> > really undefined and could lead to a segfault. Anyway, is it really
> > mandatory to do dlclose after getting the pointer ? It is if we do
> > dlopen every time we get a po
I came up with a similar idea a few weeks ago.
The panel will have to lost focus automatically when no input is given within
a certain time.
Regards,
Ampere
On June 25, 2004 11:17 am, Josh Babcock wrote:
> Whatever we do, it should be self documenting. There should be a way to
> turn on someth
Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, if the library is really unloaded, the pointer access should be
> really undefined and could lead to a segfault. Anyway, is it really
> mandatory to do dlclose after getting the pointer ? It is if we do
> dlopen every time we get a pointer, but th
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately RTLD_DEFAULT isn't supported on all platforms (it isn't
> supported in IRIX anyhow). I think that if what you describe is the
> problem this really is a bug at your side. What happens is that the
> function pointer is copied to ftpr. So dlcos
Jim Wilson wrote:
Modelers could perhaps build at the "aircraft specific" versions, so
that they are there, and the program would default to ignoring these. Users
who wanted the alternate versions could then deliberately enable them.
Best,
Jim
___
Flig
Christian Brunschen wrote:
By allowing aircraft to provide hints, we could actually include a few
different keyboard & joystick configurations to match different broad
types of aircraft, or different broad capabilities (ie, sets of
instruments and controls), which could allow those keyboard
con
David Megginson wrote:
> Some of these are using the bindings solely to set flap detents
> we should find a better system than that.
We already do, actually. Take a look at the 747 configuration,
you basically just drop in a /sim/flaps section that looks like:
0.000
0.000
0.167
On 25 Jun 2004, at 14:16, David Megginson wrote:
Christian Brunschen wrote:
What would be really good is if it were possible for the *user* to
define an arbitrary number of keyboard / joystick configurations.
These could also be named and grouped together; and there should be
an easy way to swit
Christian Brunschen said:
>
> Just one personal opinion ...
>
> What would be really good is if it were possible for the *user* to
> define an arbitrary number of keyboard / joystick configurations. These
> could also be named and grouped together; and there should be an easy
> way to switch
David Megginson said:
> Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the dumb question: why are they offending? I'm in favor of limiting
> > aircraft specific key bindings to a very small number of keys (like 1 or 2),
> > but I'm also not clear why the input binding configuration needs to be handled
> > d
Christian Brunschen wrote:
What would be really good is if it were possible for the *user* to
define an arbitrary number of keyboard / joystick configurations. These
could also be named and grouped together; and there should be an easy
way to switch between these configurations, from the keyboar
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> I was looking at the clouds at KSFO today and noticed that the clouds were
> moving towards the wind as indicated by the windsock. Windsock pointed
> towards 80 deg and clouds were moving towards 260 deg.
>
> I checked the "environment" subtree in the property browser, a
On 25 Jun 2004, at 12:36, David Megginson wrote:
Jim Wilson wrote:
Sorry for the dumb question: why are they offending? I'm in favor of
limiting
aircraft specific key bindings to a very small number of keys (like 1
or 2), but I'm also not clear why the input binding configuration
needs to be ha
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Alex Romosan wrote:
> > trying to debug why i wasn't able to run flightgear on my laptop, i
> > think i found a problem with SGLookupFunction. the problem is that we
> > call dlclose() before we return the pointer to the GL function, and,
> > if i understand things correctly,
Jim Wilson wrote:
Sorry for the dumb question: why are they offending? I'm in favor of limiting
aircraft specific key bindings to a very small number of keys (like 1 or 2),
but I'm also not clear why the input binding configuration needs to be handled
differently than it is now.
It's a layering v
Alex Romosan wrote:
trying to debug why i wasn't able to run flightgear on my laptop, i
think i found a problem with SGLookupFunction. the problem is that we
call dlclose() before we return the pointer to the GL function, and,
if i understand things correctly, this invalidates the handle and the
ad
29 matches
Mail list logo
