roups.com [mailto:
> fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Stewart
> *Sent:* terça-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2009 20:09
> *To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies
>
>
>
> I think signing is a good idea, it just makes
: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com
Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies
I think signing is a good idea, it just makes playing with other code
easier, imho.
Andy
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:58 PM, James Gregory
wrote:
Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left
I think signing is a good idea, it just makes playing with other code
easier, imho.
Andy
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:58 PM, James Gregory wrote:
> Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone
> currently. The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome
> to sig
Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone currently.
The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome to sign it
yourself until we make a decision.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Balck wrote:
>
> I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or
I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all
for signing.
On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory"
wrote:
> Guys,
> I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a very easy
> fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I
> th
