On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:23:22 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
Please try again using
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/00cf858afeand let me know if the
situation improves. If it still is not working,
please run with the --sshtrace com
Nevermind, I guess specifying the port is not optional. The other critical
piece was specifying the remote fossil to use:
../fossil clone
'ssh://localhost:22//nfs/ch/disks/ch_home_disk002/mrwellan/fossils/megatest.fossil?fossil=/tmp/mrwellan/fossilssh/fossil'
mt.fossil
All working now!! Many than
This works for me also but I had to comment out the adding of -p as the
port was coming though as "0" (this is using fsecure ssh, tcsh, SLES9.)
#ifdef __MINGW32__
blob_appendf(&zCmd, " -P %d", g.urlPort);
#else
/* blob_appendf(&zCmd, " -p %d", g.urlPort); */
I also haven't made sense
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:23:22 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
Please try again using
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/00cf858afeand let me know if the
situation improves. If it still is not working,
please run with the --sshtrace com
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:04 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:36 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
I've tested this here (with Fossil-4473a27f3b6e049e) but can only report
partial success:
* it works using bash/ksh as login shell on the remote machine _if_
there
is not too mu
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Please try again using http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/00cf858afeand
> let me know if the situation improves. If it still is not working,
> please run with the --sshtrace command-line option and send me the
> diagnostic output. Tha
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:36 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
> I've tested this here (with Fossil-4473a27f3b6e049e) but can only report
> partial success:
>
> * it works using bash/ksh as login shell on the remote machine _if_ there
> is not too much text (the allocated buffer size (5) is still rat
I've tested this here (with Fossil-4473a27f3b6e049e) but can only report
partial success:
* it works using bash/ksh as login shell on the remote machine _if_ there
is not too much text (the allocated buffer size (5) is still rather
modest but usually sure sufficient) coming in from `.pr
Sorry, my mistake. You are right, there are two echo's in my code. I had
intended to remove the first one. I did a clean restart with your fix
(./configure;make clean;make ... then test) and now it works perfectly. I
must have had a stale file sitting around.
Works great now, Thanks!
On Sun, Nov
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
> Comparison of your fix vs. my hack below. I suspect that blindly clearing
> out the buffer of any line noise before sending anything to the remote end
> will work better but I have no logic or solid arguments to back up that
> assertion.
>
B
Comparison of your fix vs. my hack below. I suspect that blindly clearing
out the buffer of any line noise before sending anything to the remote end
will work better but I have no logic or solid arguments to back up that
assertion.
=
matt@xena:~/data/fos
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
>>
>>> I'll top-post an answer to this one as this thread has wandered and
>>> gotten very long, so who knows who is still
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
>
>> I'll top-post an answer to this one as this thread has wandered and
>> gotten very long, so who knows who is still following :)
>>
>> I made a simple tweak to the ssh code that ge
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
> I'll top-post an answer to this one as this thread has wandered and gotten
> very long, so who knows who is still following :)
>
> I made a simple tweak to the ssh code that gets ssh working for me on
> Ubuntu and may solve some of the login
I'll top-post an answer to this one as this thread has wandered and gotten
very long, so who knows who is still following :)
I made a simple tweak to the ssh code that gets ssh working for me on
Ubuntu and may solve some of the login shell related problems that have
been reported with respect to s
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:35:25 +0100, Matt Welland
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:56 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:39:27 +0100, Matt Welland
wrote:
sshfs is cool but in a corporate environment it can't always be used.
For
example fuse is not installed for end users
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:56 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:39:27 +0100, Matt Welland
> wrote:
>
> sshfs is cool but in a corporate environment it can't always be used. For
>> example fuse is not installed for end users on the servers I have access
>> to.
>>
>> I would also
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:39:27 +0100, Matt Welland
wrote:
sshfs is cool but in a corporate environment it can't always be used. For
example fuse is not installed for end users on the servers I have access
to.
I would also be very wary of sshfs and multi-user access. Sqlite3 locking
on NFS does
sshfs is cool but in a corporate environment it can't always be used. For
example fuse is not installed for end users on the servers I have access
to.
I would also be very wary of sshfs and multi-user access. Sqlite3 locking
on NFS doesn't always work well, I imagine that locking issues on sshfs
c
> Sshfs didn't fix the problems that I was having with fossil+ssh, or at
least
> only did so partially.
Why not? In what sshfs failed to give you the equivalent functionality than
a remote access to a fossil database through ssh?
2012/11/11 Timothy Beyer
> At Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:31:57 +0100,
>
At Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:31:57 +0100,
j. van den hoff wrote:
>
> thanks for responding.
> I managed to solve my problem in the meantime (see my previous mail in
> this thread), but I'll make a memo of sshfs and have a look at it.
>
> joerg
>
Sshfs didn't fix the problems that I was having with
thanks for responding.
I managed to solve my problem in the meantime (see my previous mail in
this thread), but I'll make a memo of sshfs and have a look at it.
joerg
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:04:07 +0100, Ramon Ribó
wrote:
Hello,
One simple solution, if using Linux, is sshfs. It creates
thanks for responding.
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:53:40 +0100, Martin Gagnon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
I would really appreciate if the ssh issue could get addressed by the
developers.
It has my
Hello,
One simple solution, if using Linux, is sshfs. It creates a remote file
system in the local computer. Then, You can sync as if the remote file were
a local file. It works nicely.
Maybe the fossil ssh implementation can get some ideas from this package.
Ramon Ribó
2012/11/10 Martin Gagno
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I would really appreciate if
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff <
> veedeeh...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I would really appreciate if the ssh issue could get addressed by the
> >
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff
> wrote:
>>
>> I would really appreciate if the ssh issue could get addressed by the
>> developers.
>
>
> It has my attention. I just don't know what to do about it. Do you have
> any sug
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:48:11 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
whoa! that's a quick reply ;-).
I would really appreciate if the ssh issue could get addressed by the
developers.
It has my attention. I just don't know what to do about it.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:43 AM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
> I would really appreciate if the ssh issue could get addressed by the
> developers.
>
It has my attention. I just don't know what to do about it. Do you have
any suggestions on how to improve the way the SSH method operates?
--
D. Rich
hi list,
first time around:
I've recently had a first look at fossil. it's mostly working as
advertised but communication via ssh won't work. from going through the
archives I get the impression that this is a rather long standing problem
(~ years...) related to interfering output from the
30 matches
Mail list logo
