Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So is there a way, or is not?
No. If there was a way to tell it'd be a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e" (note to self: get more sleep)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
43991 freevnodes
>
> well vmstat showing 100% busy and iostat showing 10% busy..
No, -vmstat and -iostat are showing 13 and 12 tps (transactions per
second), respectively. -iostat doesn't show a "busy percentage".
DES
--
Dag-
& PLAY OS" *on* and add 'options PNPBIOS' to your
kernel. If that doesn't solve your problem, we have a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
* 1,7
! the
little
! horse
! jumped
! over
! the
! fence
--- 1,7
! three
! ducks
! swim
! in
! a
little
! pond
des@flood ~% diff -u old new
--- old Sun Mar 11 03:07:31 2001
+++ new Sun Mar 11 03:08:08 2001
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-the
+three
+ducks
+swim
+in
+a
little
-horse
-jumped
-over
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-h
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 04:53:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
> > Umm, you want pipe(
ut the setting of the break.
Ahem.
The other way around, actually (we increased KVM space from 256 MB to
1 GB - not 2 GB as you claim). And the problem with legacy BSDI
binaries (newer ones don't have this problem) was fixed a long time
ago, in 3.0 (before 3.0-RELEASE).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smo
Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
Try ktrace instead, it provides much more detailed information.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
an
do about cleaning them up and committing them.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could take a look at www.FreeBSD.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html
> and provide a bit more details about that crash; at the very least,
> a 'where' or 'bt' would be useful.
That, and a dmesg, or at least una
eate approximately one 68GB swap partition.
"approximately one"? :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
712
20 | 816
21 |## 2446
22 |###### 500
23 |## 326
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*
* Copyright (c) 2001 ThinkSec AS. All rights reserved.
*
* $ThinkSec$
*/
#include
#include
#include
#include
static int
- and in any case, this is irrelevant.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
hrough the source of fetch and libfetch, and
> it seems like there's some stub code that hasn't been flushed out
> completely. Anyone know of any plans to finish this up?
Feel free to send patches :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
e
segment descriptor.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
rnel
Ask the freebsd-small mailing list.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
rt's content even if you're no
longer root.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ex, and why it doesn't
print a message when it omits printing an opaque variable.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for
> > opaque MIB entries named as arguments?
> Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an
> > option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't
> > prin
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's?
> At least on ref5 as of this very moment..
Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored.
DES
--
Dag-Erling S
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's?
> > Yes, b
what's described here anyway - you'd
see the kernel stack getting smashed, not an FPU exception.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e -x
option makes it slightly less so.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Jason Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
> > best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
> > I rewrote it in C because it was t
Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSD/tuning.html
In the kernel config tuning section, you've misspelt NSFBUFS as
NFSBUFS, which doesn't exist.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Every time I tease my housemate's cat with a laser pointer, I am
> violating a US patent. (No, really.)
I need to get a laser pointer...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin Way <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just ordered a spare machine a few days ago. I'll install
> -CURRENT on it, and start the integration. I've been
> needing something to keep myself out of trouble.
That's our new slogan: "FreeBSD - keeping kids
Urban Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another strange thing is that when I try to use tcpdump it doesn´t show all
> packets. No packets are "dropped by kernel" but tcpdump have received
> packets but don´t show them. Could this in some way be related.
Use the -n op
erity and priority. They are set by the submitter
and rarely if ever changed by committers, and are usually far more
indicative of the submitter's state of mind than of the PR's
importance.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
or some pocket change are. So we
turned it back on. If you're not happy with that, put 'hw.ata.wc="0"'
in your /boot/loader.conf and they'll be off after the next reboot.
Or get real disks.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
dent on Linux would be forced to GPL their software or fold.
Talk about bait-and-switch! It's for this reason, by the way, that
the LGPL has been renamed from "Library GPL" to "Lesser GPL".
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
NetBSD rc
stuff instead of our own. I know that it won't work properly for a
while, but it would lower the amount of effort needed for anyone to
start hacking on it.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
SDK? And doesn't this sound a bit circular?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
David Preece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anyone close enough to drive round and have a quiet word?
> "Netiquette" for instance. Or "asking for trouble".
Or "lookity shiny new baseball bat"?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubs
e code, then you've effectively got a
{BSD,MIT,Apache} license (except for a few details about attributions
and the naming of derivative software), and you might as well make the
change in name as well as in function.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
ery-shortly-now(tm).
Since Mike's patch is a style cleanup with no functional impact except
plugging a memory leak, I feel it's better to commit it first, and
merge in Alexey's patch later, after it's been reviewed by this forum.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
similar at the kernel level, and as others have stated before in
a different context, driver source does not constitute adequate
documentation. It helps, but it's neither sufficient nor necessary.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on. It helps, but it's neither sufficient nor necessary."
A 3.x driver *could* be ported forward to 4.x and 5.x, but the
required changes are not trivial (newbus, SMPng...) and you'd still
need sample boards for testing and debugging, and docs for reference
when you don't unders
y if, as you say, they have a 4.1 version out now.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
', or just 'openssl -help'. You'll be surprised...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
n Linux that caused all kinds of nasty bugs and problems.
There was one in FreeBSD too. It's been fixed; accept(2) will return
-1 and set errno to ECONNABORTED, which you'd know if you'd RTFM.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
in that
socket's listen queue.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
o translate Win32 API call to NetBSD native system call.
What is the difference between PEACE and WINE?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
think is possible in FreeBSD. Apart from that, the only ugliness is
the need to fondle syscons' privates.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Marc Tardif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How can I find the source to specific functions in /usr/src/sys?
http://lxr.linux.no/freebsd/source>
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers&qu
t
seems my rabid FreeBSD propaganda has paid off :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
dynamically loadable, and we
don't want to put too much into the GENERIC kernel. 5.0 can load the
sound drivers dynamically, and I expect 4.2 will as well.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e the panic messages?
> dmesg: kvm_read:
> ---
> #0 0xc0132df8 in boot ()
> (kgdb) where
> #0 0xc0132df8 in boot ()
> Cannot access memory at address 0xce51d9b8.
> (kgdb)
This probably means the panic was in a KLD.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscr
> know if this conflicts somewhere?).
You might want to look at src/sys/i386/isa/if_rdp.c instead.
And yes, dl is available, though there's a header file called if_dl.h;
if your driver needs its own header file, call it if_dlreg.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
FengYue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3 Oct 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> -> > panic messages:
> -> > ---
> -> Where are the panic messages?
>
> Unfortunately, there is no panic messages. I compiled the kernel with
> -g (without DDB), and set
Will someone please inform the gcc developers of the last decade's
advances in C standardization? Yes, Virginia, ISO C (it's not ISO C
any more, and hasn't been since 1989) does support 'long long' and the
'll' format.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PRO
nd the
'll' format modifier) has been in the works for most of the previous
decade, and was ratified (as ISO/IEC 9899:1999) on December 16th,
1999, but gcc still seems to live in 1989-land.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
James Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe a correct and true statement is "FreeBSD is a direct decendant
> of Unix(TM). Based on the BSD sources"
I don't think there's all that much left of the original BSD
sources... at least not in the kernel.
DES
he errno (in your example, open(2)
returned 2, which is ENOENT, i.e. the file didn't exist). If it
succeeded, the value returned is the result (a file descriptor in
open(2)'s case).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # load -t md /filesystemfile
Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
any reason that FreeBSD doesn't have such a state?
It has several, depending on the type of I/O the process is waiting
for: biord (waiting for a read operation to complete), biowr (waiting
for a write operation to complete), select (waiting for descriptors to
become readable / writable), etc.
x27;t Do That. Sorry.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Nov 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > # load -t md /filesystemfile
> > Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
> Actually, it's md_im
void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any reason top couldn't add these up and report a %iowait
> like Solaris'?
Yes. It would conceal valuable information. Do the adding up in your
head.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [...]
> Jessem.
Amazing what people will do to evade killfiles. Plonk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ther messages, with timestamps, to various log
files located in /var/log (most prominently /var/log/messages) as
specified in /etc/syslogd.conf.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Yusuf Goolamabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recently there was a message indicating that ISC is deprecating
> nslookup.
"Recently"? nslookup has been officially deprecated for about a year
and a half, I believe.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Uns
Enemy said it before: don't believe the hype. In this case, the hype
> that an Internet year is only a few weeks of wallclock time.
I'm sure there must be some meaning to what you write, but it keeps
eluding me.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
It talks about passing an address to the
> function. I don't get it... What address? I want it to allocate memory
> for me and tell me its address. How am I supposed to know what address
> is available???
Did you even read the man page?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL P
Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > "Recently"? nslookup has been officially deprecated for about a year
> > and a half, I believe.
> Will a replacement be added to the base distro? When?
1) nslookup is still in the b
"G. Adam Stanislav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:32:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Did you even read the man page?
> Many times, actually. And on different days, too. :)
No, you didn't. You probably read the first line, t
"G. Adam Stanislav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:11:06PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >The second and third sentences of the second paragraph (the one that
> >starts on line 23), as well as the entire eighth paragraph (that
>
ptor to /dev/zero (or was it /dev/null?)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Remy Nonnenmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, I may think using this solution if it remains portable between
> > Unixes.
> It's perfectly portable, with one small variation - on BSD systems,
> yo
packets for port 23 and detect if a user logged on?
> I'm pretty unsure about this..
Why don't you tell us what you want to do, instead of how you think it
must be done?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BSD for the masses.
"BSD on every desk and in every home"
DES (ducks, runs)
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
27;t
> it - how often the saver is called to do its dance..
kern.* is not the right place for this. It should go in user.*, unless
that is reserved for userland, in which case a subtree of kern.* is
probably the Right Thing.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: s
itute for reading src/sys/sys/sysctl.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
f the expected number of users (724 in your case -
closest primes are 719 and 727), create that many bucket directories,
and place each user in bucket ID mod K.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ust like you want an odd (and
preferably prime) stripe size on RAIDs to (amongst other reasons)
avoid having all the superblock backups end up on the same disk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers&qu
ta_command: timeout waiting for intr
> ata0-master: ata_command: identify failed
> ad2: 39082MB [79406/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA66
>
I bet your CD-ROM is incorrectly configured as master.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
Office.
> If you want to run both Netscape and StarOffice at the same time, 128MB
> isn't enough. Sigh.
Avoid StarOffice like the plague. It's neat, but it leaks like a
sieve, and barely crawls along on my 450 MHz K6-2.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsu
correctly sets cpu_vendor to "ConnectixCPU"
(rather than e.g. "GenuineIntel" or "AuthenticAMD") you can just check
against that. It's declared in .
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
C_CPU
> int cpu_is_vpc;
> #endif
> and not break anyone's heart?
No. Check cpu_vendor at probe/attach time and set a flag in the
interface's softc that indicates that it needs to be treated as a VPC
emulated interface.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mmer. In other words you can write a program
> exactly like another, if you can prove you never saw the other
> program. If you saw the similar program you are dirty.
AT&T (or Novell, don't remember if it was before or after the sale of
USL) tried to use that argument against UCB. It
f the directory exists; make sure to differentiate between
"somebody already holds the lock" and "the lock can't be created due
to permission errors or some other problem" by examining $!)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > What are you guys smoking?
> *shrug* Can you spell "event-driven"? There are ways to do things much
> more elegantly today (see all the references to
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:44:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > > What are you
ery well received. The 3.1-RELEASE and 3.2-RELEASE CD
sets had the "waiter beastie" graphic (the one on 3.1 had no tail!),
but by 3.3 WC had reverted to Hosokawa-san's "beastie coming out of a
CD" artwork.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscrib
vely slow) route lookup process. The packet flows
> directly from one layer2 input routine directly to the opposing
> layer2 output routine without traversing the IP layer.
And more importantly, without traversing ipfw or ipfilter. In other
words, don't use this on a firewall.
DE
ts (because our ints and pointers are
the same size), but that's no reason not to do things right.
Also, I don't see the point in munging the Makefile like you do - I
think we can live with having a Makefile that's slightly (and
trivially) different from NetBSD's.
DES
--
Dag
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your rcorder patch is incorrect.
Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and
connect rcorder(8) to the build?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
t header, I should have
simply looked at the libutil Makefile. Thanks!
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e -l command-line option to kdump.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's a correct patch.
Murphy's Law of Attachments, etc.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin
ptrace() can only return one int
at a time from process memory whereas with /proc/pid/mem you can read
as much as you want in one go.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh? Int on alpha is 32, and pointer is 64.
I thought we were ILP64 on 64-bit archs, but you're right. And I
ought to know better...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your rcorder patch is incorrect.
Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and
connect rcorder(8) to the build?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
"Eugene L. Vorokov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uhmz ?
Your shell is broken.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22 Nov 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > I've set up a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> Any reason this can't/shouldn't be a freebsd.org mailing list?
Mostly because setting up a freebsd.org mailing list takes
nisms for PR handling in the context
of the FreeBSD Project.
To subscribe, send the usual magic incantations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Gary Jennejohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This seems like a fatal name for the list considering what
> buggers means.
I know perfectly well what it means. I did say the list was informal,
didn't I? :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: se
f the data will end up getting converted to heat by their
equipment, but they generally have good cooling, so if you don't
overdo it you should be OK.
I hope this answers your question.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with &quo
201 - 300 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
