Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Adam Weinberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> (12.25.2002 @ 1728 PST): Gary W. Swearingen said, in 2.0K: << > > > > I'm not sure what that means. ... > semantic >adj : of or relating to the study of meaning and changes of > meaning; "semantic analysis" OK, good. Thanks

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Adam Weinberger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> (12.25.2002 @ 1728 PST): Gary W. Swearingen said, in 2.0K: << > > It's just semantics, really. > > I'm not sure what that means. No, seriously, my dictionary says "study > or science of the meaning of language forms", but does that include the

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's just semantics, really. I'm not sure what that means. No, seriously, my dictionary says "study or science of the meaning of language forms", but does that include the meaning of single words or only about the meaning imparted by sentence str

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-12-25 14:29:44 -0800: > Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well that's an interesting idea. Throw-away subdomains (excuse my > > terminology - maybe I'm supposed to call them host names?) imply a whole > > "host" of email addresses without wasting a domain na

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-25 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Kurt Bigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well that's an interesting idea. Throw-away subdomains (excuse my > terminology - maybe I'm supposed to call them host names?) imply a whole > "host" of email addresses without wasting a domain name. No excuse needed, if my reading is correct. O'Reilly'

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 12:49:43PM -0800, Ken McGlothlen wrote: > "Jimi Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | That way when I start getting Viagra or penis enlargment offers (and God > | knows I need 'em ;)) addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can voice a loud > | and provable complaint. > >

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Ken McGlothlen
"Jimi Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | That way when I start getting Viagra or penis enlargment offers (and God | knows I need 'em ;)) addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can voice a loud | and provable complaint. Well, unfortunately, you might be falsely accusing Best Buy, since it's li

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 12/24/02 3:53 AM, Rob O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> For web use, I use a throw-away free-ISP account (which lets me pop mail >>> from >>> anywhere!) which hands out email addresses in the form >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> - whenever a web sites asks me for an email address, I use their

RE: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Jimi Thompson
r. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew Brampton Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:02 PM To: Kurt Bigler; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack] I think the orginal poster didn't

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Andrew Brampton
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 7:07 PM Subject: Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack] > on 12/24/02 3:53 AM, Rob O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote: > >> on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROT

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 12/24/02 3:53 AM, Rob O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote: >> on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never >>> use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums, just a

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote: on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never > use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums, just attracks > crackers. I currently create a new email address for every cate

Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-23 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never > use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums, just attracks > crackers. > I guess it just depends on the person, I just prefer to use different e-mail > accounts for work an