gvinum forgetting drives in 6.0R?

2005-11-10 Thread Marc Ramirez
I'm doing some testing in 6.0, and something strange is happening: 1) uname -a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 2) I build a stripe set using 'gvinum create' and the following config: drive dr3 dev

GENERIC kernel, crashing server

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
hello i got a problem with my server running 6.0 sometimes it just crashes and reboots i dont know why this fenomena might be when there is lot of access to my ar0 i have cut all access to it atm and havent crashed just a guess though but here is the output of kgdb with backtrace and below you go

RE: usbd.conf

2005-11-10 Thread Darren Pilgrim
usbd is deprecated. Please use devd. From: Petr Holub > > I've found that usbd on 6.0-RELEASE doesn't react on detach > event properly: ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscri

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Craig Boston
Oh, ignore me I just read the thread from beginning and saw that you already thought of that and didn't have console access :-/ Craig ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe,

Re: ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.

2005-11-10 Thread Ade Lovett
On Nov 10, 2005, at 05:30 , Ricardo A. Reis wrote: Reducing the problem to the relevant pieces: ahd0: port 0x2400-0x24ff, 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xdd20-0xdd201fff irq 32 at device 2.0 on pci3 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: po

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:57:56PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote: > So it turns out you can set kern.geom.debugflags from loader.conf. The > gvinum mirror problem I was trying to debug was causing the problem. > Edits to loader.conf were only being written to the second disk, but the > loader was read

Re: i386/87208 : /dev/cuad[0/1] bad file descriptor error during

2005-11-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I'm CCing this follow-up to freebsd-stable because this problem can prevent use of RELENG_6 machines in production (mgetty is quite usual example of such a use). This bug is a regression vs. RELENG_5/4. My analysis shows that it isn't only dup() problem. File descriptor 0 get somehow "

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Lenaerts
> You have an option to use the FreeBSD agp device support or nVidia's. I > have no idea what criteria one might use to select between them. > > > i'll try recompiling this evening the port and try a boot -s :) > > If the device is loaded from /boot/loader.conf you might need to disable > that

Crashing after umounting unavailable filesystems

2005-11-10 Thread William Denton
On 10 November 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: Opps, I crashed the machine. When I moved it, I unplugged the USB DVD-RW and I had mounted one of the dist discs on there. When I did a umount it paniced. My bad. That happened to me the other day too. I'd mounted a USB flash drive, unplugged the

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Ben Kelly
Sarxan Elxanzade wrote: It looks like console access is necessary. But may be someone prompt another solution. So it turns out you can set kern.geom.debugflags from loader.conf. The gvinum mirror problem I was trying to debug was causing the problem. Edits to loader.conf were only being writ

Consistent 6.0-STABLE Hang

2005-11-10 Thread Cy Schubert
Running the Citrix ICA wfcmgr (from ports) to change settings, e.g. password, for connection to a Windows terminal server hangs FreeBSD 6.0 (as of Nov 4) quite consistently. I've tried this on one of my 6.0 systems at home and a 6.0 system here at work. I suspect it may have something to do wit

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:32, Paul T. Root wrote: > Things are running better now. I moved it to a dedicated > DSL line in my lab, and it's chugging along. > > I see an occasional g_vfs_done message fly across. Error 16 > on a read. > Something like > g_vfs_done: acd0[READ(offset=81920, leng

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Paul T. Root
Things are running better now. I moved it to a dedicated DSL line in my lab, and it's chugging along. I see an occasional g_vfs_done message fly across. Error 16 on a read. Something like g_vfs_done: acd0[READ(offset=81920, length=2048) Error = 16 Opps, I crashed the machine. When I moved it, I

Re: kernel panic with cdrecord

2005-11-10 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:41:05 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but anything else fails. (Ok, I have tested the vommands -toc, > -msinfo, -prcap, -atip, -checkdrive, -prcap) Ok, the machine now has 6.0-release / amd64 on it, and the error seems to be gone. At least none of the c

Re: Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/10/05, Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you please consider to try "gpt" instead of "bsdlabel"? > > BTW. The dmesg meesage indicates that your array is degraded :-( Is it possible to have sysinstall use gpt instead of bsdlabel, and then to boot from a gpt based array? I haven't had

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 10 November 2005 09:42, Paul T. Root wrote: > I moved the machine to a DSL line here, and am running > portmanager. It seems to be working. > > We're going to investigate issues with this beta Cisco > ASA machine. I am very interested at how things go with your upgrade, please keep m

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:26, Paul Root wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > *** > > This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to > > be free of known security risks. ***-*** > > port and install or restart gnome-upgrade.sh > >

Re: Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was > assigned to it. > > I'd check on the running box but: > koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0 > disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported > > /dev only shows:

usbd.conf

2005-11-10 Thread Petr Holub
Hi, I've found that usbd on 6.0-RELEASE doesn't react on detach event properly: usbd.conf: device "iKey 3000 Series Token" vendor 0x04b9 product 0x1300 detach "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/openct.sh stop" attach "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/openct.sh start" what happens (usbd -d -): usbd:

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
> How is this different from a fresh install? It doesnt require physical access to the machine and a CD drive (or any of the other hoops I sometime jump through to boot the install process). Much easier. -pcf. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Paul T. Root
How is this different from a fresh install? Except for a very limited amount in config files, which would be easier to save and restore. And home directories. Again, save and restore. Pete French wrote: *** This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Taylor wrote: | ar0: 156334MB status: READY | ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad6 at ata3-master | ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad4 at ata2-master Ok - so the apparent kernel memory leak appears to be associated with RAID-1. I have RAID-0+1

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/10/05, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I vote for /sbin/nologin as root's login shell. > > In single-user mode, the systems asks for the shell, with > /bin/sh being the default. In multi-user mode, nobody > should ever log in as root. You rather log in as normal > user and

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread David Taylor
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michael Butler wrote: > David Taylor wrote: > > | [snip] > | > | I'm still seeing (lots) of these messages (below) on 6.0-RELEASE. > | Should I just file a PR about it, and is there anything else that > | would be useful to track down what's causing them? > > I get these wit

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Taylor wrote: | [snip] | | I'm still seeing (lots) of these messages (below) on 6.0-RELEASE. | Should I just file a PR about it, and is there anything else that | would be useful to track down what's causing them? I get these with an HighPoint

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread David Taylor
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, David Taylor wrote: > I've been seeing a number of strange messages in my log since > updating to 6.0-RC1. Usually they happen when some intense > disk access is happening (e.g. when /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid > is running at 03:01), but it doesn't happen _every_ mor

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Oliver Fromme
Marwan Burelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:13:26PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Under some circumstances it can also be useful to have > > an "emergency user" which is not dependant on anything > > outside the base system (i.e. doesn't use anything from > > /usr/

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Marwan Burelle
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:13:26PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Under some circumstances it can also be useful to have > an "emergency user" which is not dependant on anything > outside the base system (i.e. doesn't use anything from > /usr/local, doesn't have its home on an NFS volume, > doesn't

Re: kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
On 11/10/05, Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > > trap number = 30 > > > panic: unknown/reserved trap > > > Uptime: 46m5s > > Looks weird. Would you please also attach the dmesg.boot generated > with "boot -v" (or verbose boot if

RE: Anyone having problems with xorg 6.8.2 on 6.0-R

2005-11-10 Thread Will Saxon
> -Original Message- > From: Roland Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:38 AM > To: Will Saxon > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Anyone having problems with xorg 6.8.2 on 6.0-R > > > For DRI, you need an extra device on 6.0. On 5.4 it used to be: >

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

2005-11-10 Thread Johan Ström
On 10 nov 2005, at 12.54, Johan Ström wrote: On 10 nov 2005, at 00.25, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote: Hi I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new. Im trying

Re: kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Xin LI
On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > trap number = 30 > > panic: unknown/reserved trap > > Uptime: 46m5s Looks weird. Would you please also attach the dmesg.boot generated with "boot -v" (or verbose boot if you use beastie boot menu), which may be helpful for us to fig

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Jan Grant
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Filip Lenaerts wrote: > hi all > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:17:13AM +, Jan Grant wrote: > > > > FWIW I've just done a successful remote source-based upgrade from 5.4 to > > 6.0 (I'm brave) with no problems. I use a second root and /usr to be > > also did that last n

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Lenaerts
hi all On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:17:13AM +, Jan Grant wrote: > > FWIW I've just done a successful remote source-based upgrade from 5.4 to > 6.0 (I'm brave) with no problems. I use a second root and /usr to be also did that last night with the latest sources, but failed when booting in si

ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.

2005-11-10 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
Hi all, The University where i work recent acquire a new server, i install FreeBSD 6.0 and update for STABLE yestarday, in dmesg i see this messages"" ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred. full-dmesg-output Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983,

Re: After 6.0-RELEASE, still cannot find ATA disk com VIA8235

2005-11-10 Thread Oliver Fromme
João Carlos Mendes Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After 5.4-RELEASE I did try to install FreeBSD on a spare > desktop at work, but it failed to boot, with a kernel trap 12 and > ATA_IDENTIFY time out. > > Knowning that 6.0 has a completely new ata driver, I did it > again. Now t

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

2005-11-10 Thread David Adam
I can't help with most of your problem, but... On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Johan Ström wrote: > Is there any way to check if a lib is strip'd/got debug symbols or not? file(1) will tell you. /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libmagic/compress.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stri

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump

2005-11-10 Thread Johan Ström
On 10 nov 2005, at 13.55, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:46:37PM +0100, Johan Ström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 112 lines which said: Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239, all the latest from ports. The problem I have is this: I

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Oliver Fromme
Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, nothing outside the base system is required to build the base > > system. But don't nuke the ports before running cvsup :) > > Heh, I have done that in the past, I have to admit :-) Also must > note that one should not remove ones login

Re: Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64. > > Under 5.4-R I could have >1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not > having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too. > > However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic: > > /dev/da0s1d

Re: Anyone having problems with xorg 6.8.2 on 6.0-R

2005-11-10 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:47:41PM -0500, Will Saxon wrote: > Hello, > > I upgraded my amd64 installation to 6.0-RELEASE, and I am no longer > able to use X. It exits with a signal 11 error. I have recompiled from > ports, installed from packages from freebsd.org and performed a clean > install

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
> No, nothing outside the base system is required to build the base > system. But don't nuke the ports before running cvsup :) Heh, I have done that in the past, I have to admit :-) Also must note that one should not remove ones login shell before changing back to /bin/sh if one wants to be

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:27:52 + Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > will remove all the ports first, so it is just back to the basic system. > But Perl is now a port - should I remove this, or should I leave it alone, > i.e. is it required for the build process ? No, nothing outsi

RE: Adaptec SATA 1210SA+ Freebsd 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Wuytack
Hi, I also tried to create the label via the command line (following the handbook). web2# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ar0 count=2 2+0 records in 2+0 records out 1024 bytes transferred in 0.000757 secs (1352746 bytes/sec) web2# disklabel /dev/ar0 | disklabel -B -R -r ar0 /dev/stdin disklabel: /dev/ar0

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
> You don't have to remove the ports prior to upgrading. Just recompile them > later. Why would I want to do that though ? It gives me no advantages, and some serious disadvantages (especially if I am doing this on a 'live' system). Much easier to delete everything prior to the upgrade, and then

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

2005-11-10 Thread Johan Ström
On 10 nov 2005, at 00.25, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote: Hi I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new. Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss

TCP error messages in 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Patrik Roos
After 6.0 hit stable, I decided to upgrade my machine. Uname now reads: FreeBSD pumpkin.lolikon.org 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sat Nov 5 08:12:50 CET 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PUMPKIN i386 After the upgrade, however, I started getting spurts of error messages posted

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Andreas Nemeth
On Thursday 10 November 2005 12:27, Pete French wrote: > Thanks for all the comments - it sounds like it's a pretty safe thing to > do. I have one more question though - when I upgrade a machine this way I > will remove all the ports first, so it is just back to the basic system. > But Perl is now

Adaptec SATA 1210SA+ Freebsd 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Wuytack
Hi, I just installed freebsd 6 and it all runs fine, but when I try (via sysinstall) to make a new label on a partition on ar0, the system says: 'ata2 disconnect requested' and freezes. I there something extra I need to do make ar0 to work properly? Many thanks, Filip This is the output of my d

After 6.0-RELEASE, still cannot find ATA disk com VIA8235

2005-11-10 Thread João Carlos Mendes Luis
Hi, After 5.4-RELEASE I did try to install FreeBSD on a spare desktop at work, but it failed to boot, with a kernel trap 12 and ATA_IDENTIFY time out. Knowning that 6.0 has a completely new ata driver, I did it again. Now the system boots, and shows absolutely no error message. But

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
Thanks for all the comments - it sounds like it's a pretty safe thing to do. I have one more question though - when I upgrade a machine this wa I will remove all the ports first, so it is just back to the basic system. But Perl is now a port - should I remove this, or should I leave it alone, i.e.

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Jan Grant
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ronald Klop wrote: > > > > > PS.: Just did an upgrade remote from 5.4-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE without > > > any problems. Steps taken as described above ;) > > > > How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote? (Rebooting is

Re: Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread Xin LI
On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64. > > Under 5.4-R I could have >1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not > having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too. [snip] Would you please consider to try "gpt" instead o

Re: unmount pending error on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Xin LI
On 11/10/05, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I run a recent RELENG_6 from three days ago. This is my file server > and all my drives are doubled. I made a small script that mounts the > mirror disk, rsync all files to it and finally unmount it. > > While testing this script, I interru

Re: unmount pending error on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Thursday, 10. November 2005 11:21, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > While testing this script, I interrupted the rsync and the script's trap > tried to unmount the filesystem. umount(8) seemed to stall for a couple > of minutes (I didn't mesure precisely) and finally I get the following > error message

Re: kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel > i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1 > [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: > /u

unmount pending error on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, [ Please Cc: me in replies, I'm not subscribed to this list. ] I run a recent RELENG_6 from three days ago. This is my file server and all my drives are doubled. I made a small script that mounts the mirror disk, rsync all files to it and finally unmount it. While testing this script, I in

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pertti Kosunen
Ronald Klop wrote: 7. reboot into single-usermode and verify your new kernel works >>> 8. mount -a How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote? (Rebooting isn't really the problem, working in single-usermode is.) When i updated 5.4 to 6.0-BETA5 i skipped the reboot in single user and

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2005-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2005-11-10 08:36:54 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-10 08:36:54 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2005-11-10 08:36:54 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-10 08:37:19 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-10 08:37:19 - cd

kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output [EMAIL PROTECTED]>kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_looku

kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output [EMAIL PROTECTED]>kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gd

Re: upgrading 5.4 -> 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ronald Klop wrote: PS.: Just did an upgrade remote from 5.4-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE without any problems. Steps taken as described above ;) How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote? (Rebooting isn't really the problem, working in single-usermode is.) Typically