On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Sharad P wrote:
> hi,
> can you tell from which time acct start time is calculated. here is the
> sample of logs.
If you mysql, see sql/mysql/dialup.conf.
>
> Acctstarttime is calculated from current date and Acct-Session-Time but
... which I assume you already d
ernet-free:0 |
> > > 10.255.223.70 | 1970-01-01 07:49:46+01 | 2012-04-29 18:49:05+02 |
> > > 2c:44:01:ee:80:da
> > > 19375 | 2c:44:01:ee:80:da:poznan-internet-free:1335696779 |
> > > 10.255.223.50 | 2012-04-29 18:42:45+02 | 2012-04-29 20:28:08+02 |
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Sharad P wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a radius server configured on my Pc and a AP connected to my PC.so
> there is no different NAS.
your AP is the NAS
>
> and if the time is set wrong then why dont i get all acct-session-time
> wrong??In middle of some logs i see th
.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Acct-session-ID-shows-0-tp5709113p5709803.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:23 PM, alan buxey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I have one doubt in my Acct session id i had clients mac address then ssid
>> and then session id.but in some of the Act session id it shows clients mac
>> address then ssid and then 0.because of which i ge
where can isee this generator?
--
View this message in context:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/Acct-session-ID-shows-0-tp5709113p5709781.html
Sent from the FreeRadius - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list
Hi,
> I have one doubt in my Acct session id i had clients mac address then ssid
> and then session id.but in some of the Act session id it shows clients mac
> address then ssid and then 0.because of which i get huge Acct session time
> about 947412332...please see the logs below.radi
Sharad P wrote:
> I have one doubt in my Acct session id i had clients mac address then ssid
> and then session id.but in some of the Act session id it shows clients mac
> address then ssid and then 0.because of which i get huge Acct session time
> about 947412332...please
hi,
I have one doubt in my Acct session id i had clients mac address then ssid
and then session id.but in some of the Act session id it shows clients mac
address then ssid and then 0.because of which i get huge Acct session time
about 947412332...please see the logs below.radius new is my ssid.it
Cudbard-Bell
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 4:58 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id
On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote:
>> Forgot to mention, also attempted with Acct-Multi-Session-Id, which
was in the accounti
; in the CoA packet, but that doesn't seem to apply here.
>
> I'm not sure why CoA is so complicated. If there's an Acct-Session-Id
> attribute, the NAS should use that to identify a session. Pretty much
> every other "session identification" attribut
not sure why CoA is so complicated. If there's an Acct-Session-Id
attribute, the NAS should use that to identify a session. Pretty much
every other "session identification" attribute can be ignored.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 5:26 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id
Hi Alan,
Thanks again for your reply, I just wanted to follow-up with you.
On the ASR1K BRAS we see the same Message-Authenticator when performing COA via
PPP so that
users mailing list
Subject: RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id
Okay thanks. I'll do some investigating and let you know.
It may be a little bit but I will reply with my findings.
Jay
-Original Message-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-use
g]
On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:20 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote:
> Do you know of a syntax on Radclient for defining the
> "Message-Authenticator attribute"?
It's jus
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote:
> Do you know of a syntax on Radclient for defining the
> "Message-Authenticator attribute"?
It's just like any other attribute...
Message-Authenticator = ""
> I'll see if I can find it in the accounting record, get it working and
> then follow-up as to why th
Kuhne (jkuhne)
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:08 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: RE: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your reply. I think the bottom line is I need to do some
more investigation.
I tried a PPP vs. MLPPP session and my COAs work as expected.
I'll see if I
radius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco@lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 1:50 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote:
> Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that co
Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote:
> Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that could be used aside from
> Acct-Session-Id to perform COA to a session
I'm not sure I can parse that.
I *think* the correct response is to say "read the NAS documentation".
If the NAS acc
f Jay Kuhne (jkuhne)
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:43 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id
Hi,
Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that could be used aside
from Acct-Session-Id to perform COA to a session We are using
MultilinkPPP (single session per b
Hi,
Is there another attribute syntax on radclient that could be used aside from
Acct-Session-Id to perform COA to a session
We are using MultilinkPPP (single session per bundle still) and it is not
working as it normally would with PPP.
Thanks,
Jay
RADIUS: COA received from id 48 x.x.x.99
Hi,
My doubt is regarding the freeradius-client-1.1.6 implementation is
sending the Acct-Session-Id(rfc 2866) attribute with accounting
request to radius server or not.
If yes then how they are generating the session id at run time.
Thanks
Arjun prasad
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
JOE wrote:
> Is possible to set the attribute Acct-Session-ID for a specific user
> in freeradius?, I have a problem with a Load Balancer that not set
> this atribute.
Yes. You can set any attribute to nearly any value. See "man unlang"
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscri
Hi all!
Is possible to set the attribute Acct-Session-ID for a specific user
in freeradius?, I have a problem with a Load Balancer that not set
this atribute.
Regards
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Marlon Duksa wrote:
> Thanks Alan.
> Why do you think that anything longer than 64bytes would be hard to
> implement in NASes?
That's not what I said. I said I don't expect it to work.
If you want to know why, ask the NAS vendors who write horrible code.
*My* code works.
Alan DeKok.
-
Li
Thanks Alan.
Why do you think that anything longer than 64bytes would be hard to
implement in NASes?
Marlon
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Marlon Duksa wrote:
> > The acct-session-id attribute has the length defined as =>3 in RFC
> 2059.
>
> See
Marlon Duksa wrote:
> The acct-session-id attribute has the length defined as =>3 in RFC 2059.
See RFC 2865 for the most recent definition of RADIUS.
> Is anyone aware of any practical limitations on the length of this
> attribute?
RFC 2865 limits the maximum length of
Hi -
The acct-session-id attribute has the length defined as =>3 in RFC 2059.
Is anyone aware of any practical limitations on the length of this
attribute?
Does FreeRadius support the length of this attribute to be let say 300bytes,
and are you aware of any other Radius servers that may h
> The access device in use is from a company called Juniper.
> I am using freeradius 2.1.6 (can upgrade to 2.1.7 if there is any
> advantage).
>
> Their Acct-Session-Id numbers are too large for the radutmp field.
> Acct-Session-Id=315138101 becomes Acct-Session-Id = &q
Has anyone come up with an eloquent solution for Acct-Session-Ids that are
too large for radutmp?
Has anyone come up with an alternate way of achieving the same result?
Use one of the SQL database options to store accounting/auth info, and
do the simultaneous use checking.
-
List info/subscr
I am hoping someone has encountered this before and might have suggestions
how to work around.
The access device in use is from a company called Juniper.
I am using freeradius 2.1.6 (can upgrade to 2.1.7 if there is any
advantage).
Their Acct-Session-Id numbers are too large for the radutmp
acct-session-id, where special
characters for instance [] being converted to it's hex equivalent.
See the "safe-characters" configuration in the SQL module.
For example below, the Acct-Session-Id = "301[]426932183" when inserted
into the accounting table it is inserted
Sajeewa Warnakulasuriya wrote:
> I'm having some issues with the acct-session-id, where special
> characters for instance [] being converted to it's hex equivalent.
See the "safe-characters" configuration in the SQL module.
> For example below, the Acct-Sessi
Hi All,
I'm having some issues with the acct-session-id, where special characters
for instance [] being converted to it's hex equivalent.
For example below, the Acct-Session-Id = "301[]426932183" when inserted
into the accounting table it is inserted as 301=5B=5D4269321
Alan DeKok-4 wrote:
>
> banga wrote:
>> Hi all.
>> I have found that format of Acct-Session-Id has been changed from v.1.x
>> to
>> 2.0.2
>
> Not really. Your NAS is broken. 1.1.x hides that fact. 2.x doesn't.
>
>> At debug I can see
&g
banga wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have found that format of Acct-Session-Id has been changed from v.1.x to
> 2.0.2
Not really. Your NAS is broken. 1.1.x hides that fact. 2.x doesn't.
> At debug I can see
>
> Acct-Session-Id = "1234567\000"
That's what
Hi all.
I have found that format of Acct-Session-Id has been changed from v.1.x to
2.0.2
At debug I can see
Acct-Session-Id = "1234567\000"
not
Acct-Session-Id = "1234567" (like in v.1.x)
Is there any Idea why we get this \000
Acct-Session-Id is using for radacct_ac
what is the difference between Acct-Session-Id and Acct-Unique-Session-Id?
thanks in advance.
regards,
marc
--
Get Firefox! http://tinyurl.com/cocg2
The browser you can trust.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:15:53PM +0800, Rohaizam Abu Bakar wrote:
> Dear all,
> but one case as below, i received a long "Acct-Session-Id" ... and cannot fit
> into mysql... and problem to update Stop record...
> should I change column size from char32 to reasonable valu
Rohaizam Abu Bakar wrote:
> but one case as below, i received a long "Acct-Session-Id" ... and
> cannot
> fit into mysql... and problem to update Stop record...
According to the RFCs, Acct-Session-Id can be up to 253 characters, but
probably you won't need that many.
Hi,
> but one case as below, i received a long "Acct-Session-Id" ... and cannot
> fit into mysql... and problem to update Stop record...
>
> should I change column size from char32 to reasonable value ?
I had the same problem some time ago and solved it by extending the al
Dear all,
FreeRADIUS 1.0.4
I'm using mysql to store accounting...especially to check simultaneous-use..
but one case as below, i received a long "Acct-Session-Id" ... and cannot
fit into mysql... and problem to update Stop record...
should I change column size from char3
On Tue, 17 May 2005, vicky wrote:
> Hello guys and girls,
>
> I have a small quick question. Is the attribute Acct-Session-Id (number
> 44) modifiable manually (can I set it to what I want)? If so where
> should it be modified (in witch file)?
>
What do you mean by modifiable
Hello guys and girls,
I have a small quick question. Is the attribute Acct-Session-Id (number
44) modifiable manually (can I set it to what I want)? If so where
should it be modified (in witch file)?
sanx a lot!
--
Vicky
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list
"Daniel Halle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But it seems you misinterpreted my question.
It helps to provide ALL information needed to answer your question.
The term "overloaded" is imprecise, as you have discovered.
> As you probably already know, overloa
Alan,
Thanks for your promptly response.
But it seems you misinterpreted my question.
As you probably already know, overloaded Acct-Session-Id fields bring valuable
attributes separated with an "/" in it; for example:
Feb 5 18:58:57.661: RADIUS: Acct-Session-Id [44] 221
&qu
since I'm getting overloaded
> Acct-Session-Id from the gateways. Does anyone ever see a parse
> solution for overloaded acct-session-id fields
Use rlm_acct_unique, which is in the default configuration. "man
rlm_acct_unique"
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Acct-Session-Id from the gateways.
Does anyone ever see a parse solution for overloaded acct-session-id fields; I
mean some solution to transform that overloaded field into several fields at
“insert” time?
Regards and thanks in advance, Danny.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http
hursday, October 28, 2004 9:09 AM
Subject: Advice needed (Acct-Session-Id vs. User-Name)
>
> Hi,
>
> I need an advice. One of my collegues suggested to drop User-Name
> for accounting purposes to avoid realm clashes (when CISCO
> drops realms in some cases).
>
> He suggests
Hi,
I need an advice. One of my collegues suggested to drop User-Name
for accounting purposes to avoid realm clashes (when CISCO
drops realms in some cases).
He suggests to store Acct-Session-Id at authorisation and
then restore User-Name at accounting stop event to make accounting.
He claims
"Casey Boone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how those two session ids relate, as they should
> be the same value.
Really? Does the documentation from your NAS vendor say that?
> Im just not certain how to read the one recorded in the radius
> server's logs.
Read the
In my radius server's radacct.log I have this:
Acct-Session-Id = "\xc3a\xf2y\x00\x01\xa5\x88"
In the logs in my RAS that corresponds with:
sessionID: 0001A318
I am trying to figure out how those two session ids relate, as they should
be the same value. Im just not certain how
52 matches
Mail list logo
