> Building your own packages on Debian/Ubuntu is trivial. There's really
> no excuse not to run the latest code.
Matthew, I agree with you, but not when the policy is to only use what is
published on vendor (i.e. Ubuntu) repositories.
But, like I say, that's not a discussion appropriate for the
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:19:35AM +, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:
> > Well... as Alan says, upgrade. Particularly if "you know".
>
> There is no 'out of the box' version for upgrade on Ubuntu 12 at
> this point short of having to compile it ourselves, that is
Building your own packages
> > 12 with, I know, I know, FreeRADIUS 2.1.10. Python-LDAP was
>
> Well... as Alan says, upgrade. Particularly if "you know".
There is no 'out of the box' version for upgrade on Ubuntu 12 at this point
short of having to compile it ourselves, that is (situation is similar to
CentOS 6 where the
On 08/20/2013 02:27 PM, stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:
Hello all,
I'm currently attempting to use rlm_python to query LDAP (with
python-ldap) and then return an XML string in a VSA
(SAML-AAA-Assertion). However, when I try to load it, I get the
dreaded "undefined symbol: PyExc_S
stefan.pae...@diamond.ac.uk wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm currently attempting to use rlm_python to query LDAP (with python-ldap)
> and then return an XML string in a VSA (SAML-AAA-Assertion). However, when I
> try to load it, I get the dreaded "undefined symbol: PyExc_Sy
Hello all,
I'm currently attempting to use rlm_python to query LDAP (with python-ldap) and
then return an XML string in a VSA (SAML-AAA-Assertion). However, when I try to
load it, I get the dreaded "undefined symbol: PyExc_SystemError" error. This is
on Ubuntu 12 with,
e sections
(rlm_perl & rlm_python)
On 12/12/12 22:04, laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If someone can advise me...
> How to share information between the authorize() function and the
> authenticate() function within a perl or python script ?
Just set an attribute:
On 12/12/12 22:04, laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
If someone can advise me...
How to share information between the authorize() function and the
authenticate() function within a perl or python script ?
Just set an attribute:
authorize {
update request {
Tmp-String-0 := "%{some:expa
Hi,
> in perl, i could write some new attributes in RAD_CHECK ??, then
> authenticate() will access them.
> in python, attributes are read only, so i cannot use them to pass information
> to authenticate().
> A simple database, like redis, could be a solution by adding info with the id
> of the
Hello,
If someone can advise me...
How to share information between the authorize() function and the
authenticate() function within a perl or python script ?
For example, i get some information from a database in authorize() that will
reuse it in authenticate()?
I could resubmit the sql request
Yes i confirm you cannot change the request's attributes with rlm_python. With
rlm_perl you can (by using the environment variable RAD_REQUEST). I wanted to
modify the username.
So the only solution would be to modify and update the rlm_python code source.
But it is too hard for me...
re
laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
> The tuple is a read only object. So, i cannot modify the request attributes
> with rlm_python.
You already said that. I gave you a solution: fix the code.
Alan Dekok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
The tuple is a read only object. So, i cannot modify the request attributes
with rlm_python.
Unfortunately, this module is more limited than the perl one. i have to
continue with this one...
Regards,
Laurent
- Mail original -
De: "Alan DeKo
laurent.fe...@free.fr wrote:
> in the 'authorize(p)' function, p is the read only tuple of the request. I
> cannot update the request here.
Hmm... you should be able to update it. If you can't, the code should
be changed.
> Moreover, if i change the tuple config in the authorize function , ho
Hello,
I have a perl module that changes the username during the authorization phase
(retrieve from a oracle database) by modifying the user-name attribute in the
RAD_REQUEST dictionary. This update is global and can be used by the
authentication phase (still handled by the perl script).
I try
On 25 Jul 2012, at 14:57, Carl Pierre wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Is it at all possible to access this information within these modules? I am
> trying to code different behavior in my code based on IP.
NAS-IP-Address yes, Client-IP-Address maybe not, i'd have to check the code…
Are you definitely try
Hello:
Is it at all possible to access this information within these modules? I am
trying to code different behavior in my code based on IP.
Regards,
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 05/30/2012 06:43 AM, PENZ Robert wrote:
replyTuble are the attributes which are send to the requesting NAS,
but I couldn't find out what configTuple is exactly. I currently only
pass an () and it works. Is it the same as "update control" and
setting variables in the normal config files?
Yes
Hi!
The python functions should return (return, replyTuple, configTuple).
return is one of the following constants
#RLM_MODULE_REJECT = 0 # /* immediately reject the request */
#RLM_MODULE_FAIL = 1 # /* module failed, don't reply */
#RLM_MODULE_OK = 2 # /* the module is OK, cont
Hi,
>I'm trying to use rlm_python to intergrate with my own authentication
>backend, but there's so little document about rlm_python. I even cannot
>find how to specify the path to the python module.
radiusd.py living in PYTHONPATH - EXPORT PYTHONPATH=$locatio
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to use rlm_python to intergrate with my own authentication
backend, but there's so little document about rlm_python. I even cannot find
how to specify the path to the python module.
Can anybody give me a hint?
Module: Instantiating module "python&
Just to close out this thread with a solution...
Turns out that neither rlm_python nor freeradius were the problem.
They are working perfectly. The problem was my idiot wireless
administrator! Once I beat the password out of him and properly
configured the wireless switch, everything started
if other switches require the
ID.
Brett Littrell
Network Manager
MUSD
CISSP, CCSP, CCVP, MCNE
>>> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 1:24 AM, in message
>>> , Bob Brandt
>>> wrote:
Not sure if there isn't another forum or mailing list for rlm_python
specifical
CISSP, CCSP, CCVP, MCNE
>>> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 1:24 AM, in message
>>> , Bob Brandt
>>> wrote:
Not sure if there isn't another forum or mailing list for rlm_python
specifically, but...
I have been using freeradius for a while now with great resul
uses the users file and the second is from the
> > new system using the rlm_python module:
> ...
> > Tunnel-Private-Group-Id:0 := "150"
> ...
> > Tunnel-Private-Group-Id:0 = "150"
> ...
> > The debug output looks for the most part
Bob Brandt wrote:
> All my testing seems to indicate it should work, but it is not. I
> believe the problem is in how rlm_python returns the
> "Tunnel-Private-Group-Id" attribute.
As a string. The server core parses it into whatever is necessary.
Date, IP address, etc.
Not sure if there isn't another forum or mailing list for rlm_python
specifically, but...
I have been using freeradius for a while now with great results, thanks!
We are using a very simple configuration to authenticate users against LDAP
(eDirectory) and that part works great! I am tryi
Josip Rodin wrote:
> I had just written the clean rebuild instructions here, but then
> I realized what might be wrong - configure.in says:
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNC(lt_dladvise_init, AC_DEFINE(HAVE_HAVE_LT_DLADVISE_INIT, [], [Do
> we have the lt_dladvise_init function]))
>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:46:07PM +0100, Aurélien Geron wrote:
> libltdl.so.7 => /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7 (0x7f1018258000)
> => FreeRADIUS seems to rely on libltdl.so.7, as expected.
>
> #grep -i advise freeradius.ltrace
> => [no output] Apparently, the string "advise" is nowhere in ltra
Hi,
The workaround described in http://bugs.debian.org/416266 for perl works for
python too, I just tried it:
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1 freeradius -X
=> works fine
Thanks a lot,
Aurélien Geron
Le 6 janv. 2011 à 14:44, Josip Rodin a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:26:44AM +0
Hi Josip,
Here are a few commands that I just launched on my server:
#uname -a
Linux maggie 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 25 04:30:55 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
#dpkg -l | grep libltdl
ii libltdl31.5.26-4+lenny1A system
independent dlopen wrapper for GNU
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:26:44AM +0100, Aurélien Geron wrote:
> Hi and happy new year to everyone,
>
> In april I wrote the message below about python modules not being able to
> load dynamic libraries on Debian Lenny.
> I did not have time to test this ever since, but I just did, and
> unfortu
x27;s Changelog:
"Update configure script for rlm_python to avoid dynamic linking problems on
some platforms."
I did not have time to test this ever since, but I just did, and unfortunately,
I still have the same problem on Debian Lenny, using the latest FreeRADIUS
backport for Lenny
Alan DeKok wrote:
> Aurélien Geron wrote:
>> Basically, if I understand correctly, his idea is to have the python fellows
>> declare the proper dependencies in every *.so file, so that the
>> libpython2.5.so.1 file gets loaded automatically when the "math" module (or
>> any other dynamic module
Aurélien Geron wrote:
> Basically, if I understand correctly, his idea is to have the python fellows
> declare the proper dependencies in every *.so file, so that the
> libpython2.5.so.1 file gets loaded automatically when the "math" module (or
> any other dynamic module) gets loaded. Maybe tha
Hi,
I came across a bug when rlm_python executes python code that tries to load a
dynamic (shared) module. This bug seems to have been discussed 2 or 3 times on
this list, but no really satisfying solution appears to have been found so far
(as far as I know), so I thought I might raise the
Hi,
> The key for me here was to update to 2.1.7
2.1.7 and to call the python in the modules/* section
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I went back to creating a python module in the modules folder and the
post-auth is now working.
There is something missing in the experimental.conf to have it work with
that method. I prefer creating a python module anyway. Looks like there is a
bug in 2.1.4 and rlm_python where the post-auth
Alan,
Thank you for you time.
I downloaded, compiled and installed the 2.1.7 version.
I replaced my /usr/local/raddb folder by the 2.1.7 raddb folder and used
that to make sure my config didnt conflict.
I only modified radiusd.conf to add experimental.conf and added "python" in
the post-auth sect
Hi,
> I'm running FR 2.1.4.
hmm, i've had a quick skim through the code and it looks
like pre 2.1.7 didnt have some of the hooks etc needed to
be run in that section - why play with older version - give
2.1.7 a go...if you're compiling from source you may as well
run the latest /best version
ala
Alan Buxey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> It's because you're using an old version of the server. i.e. 1.x, not
>> 2.x.
>
> sites-enabled/default etc in 1.1.x? I cant recall seeing that config :-)
The post-auth section has been in rlm_python for a long time. Whethe
nabled/default[380]: Errors parsing post-auth
> section.
> }
>
Now it looks like I have a configuration error and not a python module
error. Do I have to add more than
I replaced python with example in the default file and I have the same
result for "example"
I verified my /usr/
Hi,
> Created a python module under "modules" :
so long as you are using FR 2.1.x then you shouldnt
need to do that - just simply edit experimental.conf
to make sure the python stuff is active and then edit
radiusd.conf to make sure that experimental.conf is included
(you did compile FR with expe
Hi,
> It's because you're using an old version of the server. i.e. 1.x, not
> 2.x.
sites-enabled/default etc in 1.1.x? I cant recall seeing that config :-)
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
phil lemelin wrote:
> /usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default[422]: "python" modules
> aren't allowed in 'post-auth' sections -- they have no such method.
> /usr/local/etc/raddb/sites-enabled/default[380]: Errors parsing
> post-auth section.
>
> Is this caused because I can't u
Good day Freeradius users,
I am trying to use the rlm_python module to do additional actions after an
user has been authenticated. To learn, I'm using the radiusd_test.py which
is in the python path. I haven't found an indication that says it is
impossible to do, correct me if I&#
On 07/08/2009 04:16 AM, Michael da Silva Pereira wrote:
Hi All,
I am sure i'm not the only person experiencing this problem. It seems
when using the python module to handle auth/acct.
If you include the MySQLdb module in the python script freeradius then
dies and is unable to load the pythong mo
Yeah sure does,
If I remove the line "import MySQLdb" it works fine.
It seems to definanetly have a issue with this module. I've also tried
sqlobject as a module and I get the same problem.
Thanks,
Mike
Ivan Kalik wrote:
I am sure i'm not the only person experiencing this problem. It seems
> I am sure i'm not the only person experiencing this problem. It seems
> when using the python module to handle auth/acct.
> If you include the MySQLdb module in the python script freeradius then
> dies and is unable to load the pythong module.
>
> I am using the latest stable freeradius version 2
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51 2009 : Debug: Module: Linked to module rlm_attr_filter
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51 2009 : Debug: Module: Instantiating
attr_filter.access_reject
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51 2009 : Debug: attr_filter attr_filter.access_reject {
Wed Jul 8 12:10:51 2009 : Debug: attrsfile =
"/etc
> As I told - all working file in freeradius debug mode (with -X), I
> have problems with productional threads pool mode.
I see the same issue with rlm_perl and my perl code. Works fine in
radiusd -X, or if perl is compiled to not use threads, but as soon as I
compile perl for threading and star
> As I told - all working file in freeradius debug mode (with -X), I
> have problems with productional threads pool mode.
When things work with radiusd -X and don't under radius user problems are
permissions, SE Linux or stuff like that.
Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP
-
List info/subscribe/u
Hello Ivan,
As I told - all working file in freeradius debug mode (with -X), I
have problems with productional threads pool mode.
Sure there is no 'authenticate' function but 'authorize', that
function called while authentificate block executed:
python {
mod_instantiate = radiusd_tes
> IK> Permissions. Check if freeradius user has permissions to execute the
> IK> script. I assume that you have checked that script actually works.
>
> Thanks for the answer.
> I was testing under root user, so the permissions should not be a
> problem, but I checked that also - added
> > user
Hello Ivan,
Monday, June 22, 2009 12:20:38 PM, you wrote:
IK> Permissions. Check if freeradius user has permissions to execute the
IK> script. I assume that you have checked that script actually works.
Thanks for the answer.
I was testing under root user, so the permissions should not be a
pro
> I'm trying to use Freeradius 2.1.6 release with rlm_python (python 2.6.2)
> on
> FreeBSD.
> I use default radiusd_test.py bundled with rlm_python. All is fine
> when I start radius in debug mode with -X, however in normal forked
> mode next error appear:
>
>
Hello Freeradius-users,
I'm trying to use Freeradius 2.1.6 release with rlm_python (python 2.6.2) on
FreeBSD.
I use default radiusd_test.py bundled with rlm_python. All is fine
when I start radius in debug mode with -X, however in normal forked
mode next error appear:
Error: WA
Hi Hristo
Could you supply a quick example ?
Its always good to get working example after a problem is resolved (even
if the person is resolved by the questioner)
Mike
Hristo Trendev wrote:
> The examples in src/modules/rlm_python gave me some hints and I
> figured it out. Thanks
The examples in src/modules/rlm_python gave me some hints and I
figured it out. Thanks anyway.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Hristo Trendev wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to properly setup freeradius with
> rlm_python. The module loads and scripts execute, but I seem t
I am trying to figure out how to properly setup freeradius with
rlm_python. The module loads and scripts execute, but I seem to miss
something when I try to return value pairs to be used in the reply
packet (Access-Accept). I have tried with the following script:
def authorize (params
Alexander Yu. Solodukhin писал(а) в своём письме Sat,
28 Feb 2009 22:40:35 +0200:
Hi all.
I try to use rlm_python and got import error on importing any module
that relevant on shared object.
Here an rlm_python configuration:
## cut
python {
mod_instantiate = account
Hi all.
I try to use rlm_python and got import error on importing any module that
relevant on shared object.
Here an rlm_python configuration:
## cut
python {
mod_instantiate = account
func_instantiate = instantiate
mod_authorize = account
func_authorize
gt; > freeradius.
> >
> > So, I compiled freeradius with options:
> > --with-experimental-modules \
> > --with-rlm_python
> >
> > created config files and my pythom module "radiusd_isp",
> > put
python possibilities to authorize users with
freeradius.
So, I compiled freeradius with options:
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python
created config files and my pythom module "radiusd_isp",
put it python path
freeradius -X out me:
At the end of my attempts to resolve the problem I've found out
1. Compiling options
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python \
--with-static-modules=python
2. Befor starting of freeradius I created radiusd_isp.pyc file in the
intera
freeradius-python/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] site-packages]#
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> Alexander Demidoff wrote:
> > Hello all!
> > I want to use python possibilities to authorize users with
> > freeradius.
> >
> > So, I compiled freeradius with options:
&g
/freeradius-python/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] site-packages]#
Cheers
Mike
Alexander Demidoff wrote:
Hello all!
I want to use python possibilities to authorize users with
freeradius.
So, I compiled freeradius with options:
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python
Hello all!
I want to use python possibilities to authorize users with
freeradius.
So, I compiled freeradius with options:
--with-experimental-modules \
--with-rlm_python
created config files and my pythom module "radiusd_isp",
put it python path
fre
Hi Alan
I think I have worked it out, some how I got my self confused during my
testing.
The model was there but I think each time I did not have everything
configured.
Thanks as always for your time
Mike
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Maybe I'm not getting your but even the lastest cvs does not have any
> post-proxy or post-auth support.
That's not what I meant.
> My code added the post-proxy but when I tried to use it freeradius would
> complain that rlm_python did not su
>> support for post-proxy in rlm_python.
>>
>
> You didn't install the new version of rlm_python. So it's still
> linking to the old rlm_python, without post-proxy support.
>
>
Maybe I'm not getting your but even the lastest cvs does not have any
post-p
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> I wrote the attached patch for Freeradius 1.1.7 to enabled calling
> python in the post-proxy, it compiles but will not run when the hook is
> listed in post-proxy because Freeradius complains that there is no
> support for post-proxy in rlm_python.
You d
Hi Guys
I wrote the attached patch for Freeradius 1.1.7 to enabled calling
python in the post-proxy, it compiles but will not run when the hook is
listed in post-proxy because Freeradius complains that there is no
support for post-proxy in rlm_python.
My question is where in the source is the
Hi All Again
I have not fixed it, with all the playing around with FreeRadius
versions I had not got rlm_python loading when I believed I had fixed it.
Mike :(
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm happy to say I have fixed this issue.
>
> I'm not totally happy wi
>>
>>> I decided to try freeradius-2.0.0-pre2 and its give a much clear idea of
>>> the problem.
>>> The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
>>> loading dynamic code.
>>>
>>>
>> I suspect i
d its give a much clear idea of
>> the problem.
>> The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
>> loading dynamic code.
>>
>
> I suspect it's a shared library problem. The time.so library depends
> on another one that contains PyExc_
gt;> the problem.
>> The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
>> loading dynamic code.
>>
>
> I suspect it's a shared library problem. The time.so library depends
> on another one that contains PyExc_IOError. However, that dependency
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> I decided to try freeradius-2.0.0-pre2 and its give a much clear idea of
> the problem.
> The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
> loading dynamic code.
I suspect it's a shared library problem. The time.so library depen
Hi Guys
I decided to try freeradius-2.0.0-pre2 and its give a much clear idea of
the problem.
The issue seems to be that the rlm_python module is having trouble
loading dynamic code.
Mike
write(1, "exceptions.ImportError: /usr/lib"...,
97exceptions.ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.4/l
Hi Alan
>
> Is radiusd.py in the path?
>
Yep in the same place as my own code
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/
Strace never shows that file being requested for loading.
Mike
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Got a problem with rlm_python using 1.1.7 on Debian etch with no changes
> to source other than to move rlm_python in to the stable modules file.
>
> The module is in the path and an strace shows the file being found.
Is radiusd.py in the path?
Alan D
Hi Guys
Got a problem with rlm_python using 1.1.7 on Debian etch with no changes
to source other than to move rlm_python in to the stable modules file.
The module is in the path and an strace shows the file being found.
rlm_python:python_load_function: module 'radiusd_test' is
wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am in need of developing my own application using rlm_python. Can
>> anybody inform me about some documentation available? From what I have
>> found on Internet it looks like an isolate project with lack of users
> ...
>> Anybody able
On Mon 28 May 2007, UriCALL Support wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am in need of developing my own application using rlm_python. Can
> anybody inform me about some documentation available? From what I have
> found on Internet it looks like an isolate project with lack of users ...
> Any
Hi All,
I am in need of developing my own application using rlm_python. Can anybody
inform me about some documentation available? From what I have found on
Internet it looks like an isolate project with lack of users ... Anybody able
to share the experience with me? Is it stable for production
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> I wish to add some extra valid pairs to accounting packets which are
> being proxied to other radius servers.
>
> If in the 'preacct' or the 'accounting' stage I was to add using
> rlm_python or rlm_perl value pairs would they be se
Hi All
I wish to add some extra valid pairs to accounting packets which are
being proxied to other radius servers.
If in the 'preacct' or the 'accounting' stage I was to add using
rlm_python or rlm_perl value pairs would they be sent thought to the
other radius servers ?
Peter Nixon wrote:
> Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production? Unlike rlm_perl we don't
> seem to have any example code or any decent documentation. I am looking at
> using it myself and just looking for some feedback..
I don't know whether there're many rlm_p
> Hi Guys
>
> Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production?
We do. But with a home-made module, based on corrected
module stored in bugzilla.
We made adjustments in it to meet our customer needs,
and it is therefore not reusable.
Nevertheless, we did correct memory leaks, threadi
Peter Nixon wrote:
> Hmm.. the only open bug I see against rlm_python is:
> http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182
>
> Are there some others that I didn't manage to find?
I recall someone re-writing much of the module to make it work. But I
didn't have time to
On Sat 27 Jan 2007 09:38, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Peter Nixon wrote:
> > Hi Guys
> >
> > Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production? Unlike rlm_perl we
> > don't seem to have any example code or any decent documentation. I am
> > looking at using it mys
Peter Nixon wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production? Unlike rlm_perl we don't
> seem to have any example code or any decent documentation. I am looking at
> using it myself and just looking for some feedback..
Apply the patches from
Hi Guys
Is anyone actually using rlm_python in production? Unlike rlm_perl we don't
seem to have any example code or any decent documentation. I am looking at
using it myself and just looking for some feedback..
Cheers
--
Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key:
Hi,
I have noticed that more recent rlm_python versions have function
bindings for implementing Simultaneous-Use checking in python module.
Something like this
...
python_init done
Module: Loaded python
python: mod_instantiate = "pppoe"
python: func_instantiate = "insta
why radius say :
authorize: function call failedexceptions.TypeError: unsubscriptable object
below is a modify radius_test.py
=
# Miguel A.L. Paraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
import radiusdimport MySQLdb
def instantiate(p): print "*** instantiate ***" print
Ilia Chipitsine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ?
Because the primary FreeRADIUS developers don't use python.
Please use the updated module yourself, and if it works for you,
email the list and say so.
If no one say
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
The module rlm_python is still "experimental". There are known issues
with this module.
http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?i
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
> When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
> for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
The module rlm_python is still "experimental". There are known issues
with this module.
http://bugs.freeradius.org/sho
Dear Sirs,
I just made diff between 1.0.4 and 1.1.0 rlm_python sources and they
appear to be the same.
When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing
for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
We develop an application that uses rlm_python and we
th-experimental-modules
>
> > Do I have to install the 1.0.4 version to get rlm_perl?
>
> No, but latest version is best :)
>
> > A very subjective question here... what is better to use rlm_perl or
> > rlm_python?
>
> I think that rlm_perl is likely to be sup
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
