On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Gareth Edwards <> wrote:
> Hi Chitlesh
>
> On 28 September 2010 19:03, Chitlesh GOORAH <> wrote:
>> You can find the slides on http://www.tandvsolns.co.uk/downloads/
>
> Would you mind if I re-presented your slideset to our Hacker
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:52 PM, al davis < > wrote:
> It is important to developers that the "unstable" distros DO
> package the development branch, to test it and provide feedback.
> Hamish and Chitlesh, how about it?
Ok, I'll try to update Fedora's gnucap this weekend.
I've taken over the owne
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Gareth Edwards
wrote:
> I'm sitting listening to the UK DVClub meeting and Chitlesh Goorah is
> doing an excellent job of talking about Free Electronics Lab,
> including gEDA and PCB.
>
> Well done, Chitlesh and thanks for helping to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> I just got aware of the open source mechanical CAD project freecad. It
> hit the debian repository a month ago. Although it is still lacking
> important features, much of the basic infrastructure is already up and
> running.
> http:
Hello there,
The current layout of the PCB command reference PDF document (the one
currently being shipped) is broken. It looks like it on life support.
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/pcb/refcard_old.pdf
I've updated only the layout of refcard.tex
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/pcb/refcard.t
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Werner Hoch wrote:
> Hi Chitlesh,
> If I have installed guile-gnome-platform-devel, then gwave runs fine.
> Without it, it crashes:
>.
> I think I've only a packaging error in my rpms.
> Does anybody know, which of the files in the of the devel file list
> shoul
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 PM, KURT PETERS wrote:
> > Chitlesh
> What do you intend to use gwave for? Is it for viewing SPICE output?
> Kurt
Users like it when they use it with Gspiceui.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Same problem here for AMD64. And no idea,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
>
> Hmm, considering that there is no Gentoo package for guile-gnome-gtk2 yet,
> this is a pretty likely cause...
I've encountered a similar bug about 2 years ago with the fedora gwave
package. Till then, I think I fixed it by setting g
you will find a simple howto we create a livedvd :
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/wiki/developers#CreatinghisherownLivedvd
Cheers,
Chitlesh Goorah
PS: I've just wrote it for you. If there is something missing let me know.
Chitlesh
___
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Bert Timmerman wrote:
> I just test drove FEL-11, and IIRC there is a 2008-ish version of pcb
> included.
Actually the latest version of pcb is among the fedora 11 and 12 updates :)
for EPEL-5, the latest version is in el5-testing repo
https://admin.fedoraproject
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Ineiev wrote:
> Following http://www.gnu.org/server/fsf-html-style-sheet.html,
> I think that it is wise to offer a document in as many formats as supported.
> even when running a desktop with XWindow system I typically
> prefer documentation in text format, and I co
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> You also _break_ the HTML documentation by moving away the deliberately
> installed .png / .gif files which it places there.
Well I was thinking not to ship the html file.
> Since it doesn't appear the HTML docs use the .gif files, we ought n
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> For gentoo we like to have examples and tutorials in the doc
> directories, so gentoo developers employ these patches:
> # sed -i -e 's/example//' -e 's/tutorial//' -e 's/ win32//' Makefile.in
> || die "sed failed"
> # sed -i -e
hi there again,
Examples and tutorials are also landing in /usr/share/pcb instead of
doc dir where users expect to find them.
Please accept this small path, coupled with the following changes:
* Add extension to the pcb files
mv example/LED example/LED.pcb
mv example/LED2 example/LED2.pcb
sed
Hi there,
During make install, MergePCBPS and Merge_dimPCBPS are placed in both
/usr/bin/ and /usr/share/pcb/tools. I think it is better that they
land into /usr/share/pcb/tools only.
Small patch attached.
Chitlesh
pcb-0.20091103-tools.patch
Description: Binary data
_
Hello there,
I see the build places refcard to the docdir. Is it outdated or legacy
documentation? In PCB's GUI there is already a "Key Bindings" menu. I
believe this one entails uptodate key bindings rather than the
refcard. If it is outdated, then I think it should be removed from pcb
sources.
patch
gschem instead.
Alternatively, a possible solution to your problem is to remove the
docdir in the end of your package build.
Cheers,
Chitlesh Goorah
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
Hello there,
I wish to wire two pins by loading the .sch file by an automated
method, say a script.
Is there a way or did someone already has a script which wires two
known pins automatically ?
regards,
Chitlesh
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@mo
c.f.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2009-September/msg01015.html
This seems to be using the exactly same code.
I haven't got the time to test it. Can anyone try it out please ?
Chitlesh Goorah
ud
of.
I also believe this will help other openhardware communities (see on
code.google.com) donate their symbols and footprints for the wider
gEDA community.
regards,
Chitlesh Goorah
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
Hello,
> Were the old rpms called "gEDA-gaf-" ?
No the existing rpms were called as geda developers called them, that
is geda-gschem, geda-gnetlist etc.
> There have been no "official" Debian testing packages of 1.5.4 yet, but
> I'm hope
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Wojciech Kazubski wrote:
>
> Why libgeda and libgeda-devel packages have old style version number
> (20090830) instead of new 1.5.4?
>
> Wojciech
>
I did a mistake in the past and now I'm paying the price :)
Well the mistake was that before gEDA's stable release w
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Does RPM allow multiple binary packages to be build from one source
> package? If so, I guess whether you obsolete the old structure is
> completely down to how you fancy packaging things.
>
Hello Peter,
Yes RPM can produce sub packages e.g
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Ales Hvezda wrote:
>
> An unstable/development snapshot of gEDA/gaf was released yesterday
> (1.5.3-20090829) and today (1.5.4-20090830). gEDA/gaf v1.5.3 had some
> release critical bugs (DOA) so it has been withdrawn and is no longer
> available for download. Ple
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Ales Hvezda wrote:
>
> An unstable/development snapshot of gEDA/gaf was released yesterday
> (1.5.3-20090829) and today (1.5.4-20090830). gEDA/gaf v1.5.3 had some
> release critical bugs (DOA) so it has been withdrawn and is no longer
> available for download. Ple
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>>The list of Main Categories consist of those categories that every
>>conforming desktop environment MUST support.
>
> ste...@amd64-x2 ~ $ cat /usr/share/applications/gerbv.desktop
> [Desktop Entry]
> Version=1.0
> Encoding=UTF-8
> Name=Gerb
Hello there and PeterC,
Fedora Electronic Lab includes too many EDA software and the actual
electronics-menu drowns the user into confusion. I have created
submenus on electronics-menu as you can see on this screenshot:
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/submenu/snapshot.png
The idea is that the p
Hello there,
Recently there was an email about geda/gaf's windows binaries.
I wrote a small howto which can help you automate the compilation for
those binaries with mingw cross compilers and ease the maintenance of
extra cygwin related scripts.
I have used gerbv as example here.
http://clunix
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:25 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> I fired up a torrent and it says "5 days remaining". Is there a
> faster way to get a seed? Or should I just download from chitlesh's
> HTTP link?
In the upcoming hours, the http is the quickest way. This is because
noone has a copy of the FE
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Ethan Swint wrote:
> Fedora 11 was just released, the Electronic Laboratory spins are located at
> http://spins.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-11-x86_64-Live-FEL.torrent
> http://spins.fedoraproject.org/torrents//Fedora-11-i686-Live-FEL.torrent
>
>
> This custom
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Jorge Juan wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I teach a basic digital circuit design curse at the university for
> first-year students. I plan to incorporate HDL, behavioral
> descriptions, simulation and logic optimization next year.
> I find Icarus Verilog plus gtkwave and
Hello there,
I'm trying to compile pcb for CentOS-5 and RHEL-5. However it fails
with the following error.
edif.y:41:21: error: macro "strcpy" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given
edif.y:41: error: 'strcpy' redeclared as different kind of symbol
Log:
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedo
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:57 PM, igor2 wrote:
> As usual, comments, questions, bugreports are welcome.
>From a packager point of view, can this plugin be merged to the pcb
upstream trunk ?
Chitlesh
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
h
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Joerg wrote:
> Stuart Brorson wrote:
>>> C++ for hardware design?
>>
>> SystemC:
>>
>> http://www.systemc.org/community/about_systemc/
FYI, systemc can't be redistributed as any other opensource packages.
I spent several months packaging it for fedora and applied
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> H The idea of autocreated fab notes/drawing is a good one. I
> could envision doing this using Latex/metafont driven from an external
> script. Or maybe via a Makefile? Or doxygen? The script would read
> in some type of templat
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> The package to be installed is gtk2-devel on Fedora 10. It provides
> gdk-pixbuf-2.0.pc.
FYI: to ease your life, create an rpm from the source tarball based on
fedora's spec.
# yum install yum-utils @fedora-packager
# yumdownloader --source
hello Larry,
did you incorporated my patch as well ? I did not have feedback from you since.
regards
chitlesh
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Larry Doolittle wrote:
> Friends -
>
> Check out
> http://doolittle.icarus.com/~larry/vhd2vl/
> for a new release (v2.2) of vhd2vl.
>
> User-visible fe
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> The fact FEL is a DVD would suggest that the USB image would be quite
> large, and require a more expensive memory stick..
You can have a 4GB usbstick for 20€ now-
Chitlesh
___
geda-user mailing
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:00 PM, John Griessen wrote:
> Sounds nice! I live too far away though. How will the bootable USB image
> be made? What distro is it based on? Will an image be distributed fro DIY
> creating of bootable flashes?
FYI:
The Fedora Electronic Lab LiveDVD comes with a sim
Hello there,
I want to know whether it is possible to autogenerate a
report/"factory manual" from my gEDA schematics and pcbs based on :
- the size of the board
- the BOM
- possible commented bugs or todos on the schematics
- schematic/pcb layout pictures
- ...
I am looking for a possible solutio
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Ian Chapman wrote:
>
> Working with GHDL and GTKWave is fine. Once I get the waveforms on the
> screen in an order that makes sense how do I save that for the next time
> I enter GTKWave?
On gtkwave you press ctrl-s, a .sav file should be created by gtkwave.
Ne
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
>
> Therefore, I was wondering if other folks might be interested in
> getting occasional private e-mails from me alerting them to any such
> articles. Then, folks who felt moved could respond to the posts.
> That way it wouldn't only be me r
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Although Peter has followed the pkgconfig specification, the build currently
> breaks on Fedora due to a non-standard patch the Fedora packagers have applied
> to pkgconfig.
Already fixed on rawhide(F-11):
* Mon Dec 08 2008 Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> I needed a Gantt chart for a project report, so I drew one in gschem.
>
> Oh, the strange things one can achieve with gEDA! (BTW, Cairo gschem
> looks & feels amazing, and Peter C. deserves donations towards his
> secret evil mastermind labo
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> Hello gEDA developers,
>
> A bug filed against geda-gnetlist by RedHat's security team was filed:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472116
> Bug 472116 - CVE-2008-5148 geda-gnetlist insecure temporary file
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Ales Hvezda wrote:
>
> [snip]
>>Please use the same standard as gnome apps do with respect to locale names.
>
> I need to correct some a misconception that is been spreading for some
> time now. gEDA/gaf (or PCB IIRC) are *NOT* gnome apps. gEDA/gaf and
> all the
Hello there
Following my previous emails about packaging and 1.4.2, below you will
find more items I would like to be fixed upstream.
== geda-symbols ==
this file /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-20081220/AUTHORS is not utf8
How to fix this:
mv AUTHORS AUTHORS.tmp
iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF8 AUTHORS
Hello there,
I don't recall if I have already sent a similar email before, but
below are some minor items that I want it to be fixed upstream. Most
of these have already being fixed in fedora (except the warnings
undefined-non-weak-symbol and shared-lib-calls-exit).
[r...@cgoorah ~]# rpmlint libg
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Dan McMahill wrote:
> I've just placed a new snapshot of PCB up on the sourceforge site
Hello there,
First great work PCB developers.
Below are some little changes, I'm requesting pcb developers to adopt.
Most of these changes have been applied to all Fedora pcb
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Werner Hoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you also put some source code packages to the SF download page?
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=160005&package_id=179804
>
> Maybe I will create rpms for openSUSE.
I'll try to do the same for Fedo
On 9/14/07, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Out of interest, what distribution are you using this with - the only
> distro where I've seen mixed 32 / 64 bit binaries is OpenSUSE (because
> the servers at Engineering are mostly 64 bit machines running OpenSUSE
> 10.2).
Fedora does have multilibs support as
On 9/6/07, John Griessen wrote:
> I think writing tutorials well is one good way. Another is stories
> about successful uses, put up on the gEDA website just like product
> offerers do.
I tend to agree with John here.
Perhaps a Curriculum Vitae like for each application which highlights
its big f
On 9/6/07, al davis wrote:
> > > It's not deliberate that we are "left out". We need to
> > > choose to go.
> >
> > And pay for booth space if we want a presence.
>
> Not necessarily. I didn't say "booth". There are other ways.
I might provide some space at any fedora booth worldwide for people
On 9/6/07, andrewm wrote:
> I am probably in a good position to push others
> in the direction of using gEDA but I am not
> sure how many people would take the push and
> not give up.
Well, I've started some work on providing gEDA on a livecd.
I've a development release on torrent :
http://fedorap
On 9/3/07, Daniel Sandström wrote:
> LTspice installed and run just fine for me on Ubuntu 7.04, no special
> things necessary.
Well Daniel, you didn't answer him.
You could at least entail how you installed it.
In their website they provide a windows executable.
http://www.linear.com/designtools
Hello there,
I'm looking for promotional materials about gEDA&gaf that I could use
for my new project "Fedora Electronic Lab".
Let me explain in more details:
I was working on providing open source VLSI applications (such tools
from opencircuitdesign.com and Alliance VLSI) on the next Fedora 8.
On 8/5/07, Amit wrote:
> I was able to create a netlist using gschem -> gnetlist and ngspice
> successfully loads it. I get to the point where I perform a tran
> simulation but I am not able to plot it. When I try to run the command
> 'plot out' I get an error 'Can't open viewport graphics'.
I had
On 8/1/07, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> I just ran across something on the internet that I thought might be
> interesting to list members:
>
> Alliance VLSI CAD System
> http://www-asim.lip6.fr/recherche/alliance/
How funny :) I spent the whole month of July trying to package and test it.
Alliance
On 7/24/07, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> For my CD to
> successfully install gEDA, it needs to install guile-1.8. To install
> guile-1.8 I now need to install the bugnum stuff. This is too many
> dependencies for me to feel comfortable about bundling onto a CD with
> a fairly dumb installer.
I would
On 7/24/07, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to hear if the guile 1.8.x dependency is causing people
> problems, or is preventing them from testing / using the unstable
> development branch (if they wish to).
>
> If so, I have a small patch which introduces replacements for guile 1.
On 7/19/07, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have package manager running and everything is installed except
> ngspice and wxGTK. ngspice is listed along with ngspice-doc (I'm sure
> I'm suposed to install this too). Also wxGTK is listed along with
> wxGTK-devel and wxGTK-gl. Should I install
On 7/19/07, Robert Butts wrote:
> I am a new Linux user using Fedora core 7 and I would like to install
> gSpiceUI.
You are running Fedora 7. Fedora "Core" 7 doesn't exist :)
> If someone knows how to install gspiceui or where I can get directions I
> would appreciate it greatly.
Hello,
You
On 7/14/07, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fedora is meant for cutting edge :) where bug fixes are pushed.
>
> Fedora DEVELOPMENT is for cutting edge. Fedora UPDATES is for stable
> stuff. Don't confuse the two, and please don't annoy our users by
> "shipping" something that's potent
On 7/14/07, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> They are completely unstable and really only meant for people who want to see
> the
> cutting edge.
Fedora is meant for cutting edge :) where bug fixes are pushed.
Chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
___
geda-
On Friday 13 July 2007 14:27:37 Ales Hvezda wrote:
> Release notes:
> http://geda.seul.org/devel/v1.1/1.1.1/gaf-1.1.1-relnotes.html Download:
Can you add up or rectify the fedora related download in the next
release notes, please ? stating that every single development release
of geda will be ava
On 6/27/07, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the first ever stable release of gEDA/gaf:
> 1.0.1-20070626. The focus of this release was bug fixing. This is also
> the first release created using git. Many thanks to everybody involved.
Just some quick questions which are making my l
On 6/15/07, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> Is anyone experiencing :
> file -> "open project" fails to open included examples.
>
> But if one open a project file or a gerbv file from the konsole, gerbv opens
> it successfully.
Any
Hello there,
Is anyone experiencing :
file -> "open project" fails to open included examples.
But if one open a project file or a gerbv file from the konsole, gerbv opens
it successfully.
regards,
Chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
___
geda-
On 6/15/07, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> If you can wait before pushing 20070526 anywhere, I will be creating a
> new stable release soon with a few of these important bug fixes. This
> will be the first test of a release using git.
How long "soon" will be ?
Because since Fedora X will be maintained unti
On 6/15/07, Peter Clifton wrote:
> Don't push this compiled against Guile-1.8 without a fix back-ported
> from CVS. There is (was) a nasty bug against Guile-1.8 which caused
> gschem to abort when you pressed a key with no attached key-binding.
Thanks letting me know.
On 6/15/07, Ales Hvezda wrot
On 6/15/07, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Oddly I have absolutely no need for that export when compiling on F7.
I had a strange error while rpmbuilding some geda packages last 2 weeks,
/usr/bin/perl: error while loading shared libraries: libperl.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or direct
On 6/7/07, Craig Niederberger wrote:
> My notes to self for installing gEDA from the cvs repo on Fedora 7:
> (thanks to Peter & Ben for helping me out for FC5 & 6)
>
> Even though Fedora 7 came with gettext 0.16.1, parts were missing, so
> I had to build it from the tar file at
> http://mirrors.ker
On 5/27/07, Werner Hoch wrote:
> guile 1.8 works IIRC since the last release 20070216.
> Use the guile version that is provided with your distribution.
However, I'm the one pushing geda/gaf rpms for Fedora. Thus the guile
version will depend on my choice.
I have the following branches to release:
On 5/27/07, Werner Hoch wrote:
> I've created rpm-packages for SuSE 10.0 up to openSUSE 10.2.
> rpms for SuSE 9.3 are no longer available. Sorry.
>
> Please read the note in the geda wiki how to install them:
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:suse_rpm_installation
Hello there,
I'm quite curious abo
On 5/19/07, Vincent Onelli wrote:
am I missing some thing to run this program? Can some body help?
Thank you.
Try:
on the terminal:
su -c "yum install geda*"
(root password)
chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
___
geda-user mailing list
geda
On 5/6/07, Craig Niederberger wrote:
Hi Gurus, I'm migrating (finally) to Fedora core 6. When I try to compile
the latest greatest from the cvs repo, I get:
checking for LIBGEDA... no
configure: error: libgeda detection error: No package 'libgeda' found
make: *** [gschem/config.h] Error 1
$ ls
On 4/2/07, al davis wrote:
The issue is redistribution. If you redistribute something made
of parts that are licensed differently, you must comply with
both licenses.
Hello,
I won't push --with-readline so quick into fedora.
However is there some proper documentation to help me know which part
On 4/2/07, Patrick Doyle wrote:
As long as I'm thinking about this and playing with it... does anybody
know if ngspice can be compiled with readline support? The one I have
(installed on my FC6 box via yum) doesn't support it and I miss the
command line history and editing features. I'll go loo
On 4/1/07, L.J.H. Timmerman wrote:
I just tried yum update geda* on my FC5 box and it reported:
"Could not find update match for geda"
It means that you already have the updated geda's snapshot on fedora
core 5 repositories. However it is _not_ the _latest_ geda snapshot of
february's. This is
On 4/1/07, Stuart Brorson wrote:
Please make sure you have the latest stuff from the gEDA site. The
Feb 2007 release fixed this problem.
Hello,
I have already pushed geda's 20070216 snapshot into fedora repositories.
# yum update geda*
will do the job.
Of course, if this doesn't make the exa
On 4/1/07, Patrick Doyle wrote:
1) There is no "models" directory in the example, yet the "SPICE
model" element refers to that directory. Since I am using the FC6
installation (installed via yum), I went and grabbed
geda-examples-0216.tar.gz, unpacked it, and failed to find a "models"
directory
On 3/29/07, Stephen Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> As from the next fedora buildsystem release (tonight):
> Fedora users will be having:
> geda-gattrib-20070216-1.fc6
> libgeda-20070216-1.fc6
> geda-gschem-20070216-1.fc6
> libgeda-devel-2007
On 3/29/07, al davis wrote:
Fedora: RPM packages. good beginner distro, particularly if you
have a poor net connection. Not as many packages. Enough on
CD to be useful without net.
Hello,
Actually it is not very encouraging for a fedora packager (me) or any
other "distro X" packager to see su
Hello there,
I've successfully compiled the latest snapshot 20070208. However on
executing pcb I get :
Looking for default_font in .
Can't open ./default_font for reading
Looking for default_font in /usr/bin/../share/pcb
Found default_font in /usr/bin/../share/pcb
on a "log" dialog.
I would like
Hello there,
On applying DRC on the tut1.pcb of the new snapshot: pcb-20070208p1,
it spits more errors/warning compared to the old snapshot:
pcb-20060822.
Has anything changed in that perspective in this latest snapshot?
regards,
Chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
Hello there,
I successfully created a vhdl file from
http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/cours_vhdl/halfadder.sch
http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/cours_vhdl/output.net.
However, since my schematic includes some and2 and or2, the output.net
includes the respective components, but if I compile the vhdl fil
On 2/11/07, Magnus Danielson wrote:
However, in general what you do want to do is to design in input and output
You want to go into the VHDL symbol table and use ipad-1, opad-1 and iopad-1
which will map over to VHDL in, out and inout declarations of Std_Logic type.
Assign the value of these to
Hello thre,
I'm trying to make a VHDL file from a mere simple half adder schematic:
http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/half_adder/adder.sch
with:
gnetlist -g vhdl adder.sch -o output.vhdl
http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~chit/half_adder/output.vhdl
However, I don't know how to create an entity with gschem.
88 matches
Mail list logo
