Donald,
>> For cases of "[RFC5310] Based authentication" to "[RFC5310]-based
>> authentication". Watch for one instance of "RFC 5310 Based" as well.
>OK.
>(Nit-Nit: I think in the nit above, the first word should be Four.)
Ha! (I hadn't actually counted the number of cases. )
>> Page 12, 1s
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your thorough review. See below.
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Peter Yee wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair. Please treat these
[Resending in case it wasn't received, since I have received no replies.]
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other
last ca
Hi Vijay,
I appreciate the review and comment.
> That is, are the schemes (urn, eidr) part of the case-insensitive string
> match?
Yes, it looks like
"Lexical equivalence of EIDR-URN is defined by case-insensitive string match."
should say
"Lexical equivalence of URN-EIDR is defined by case-