My vote:
5,4,3,2,6,1
IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.
5, 4, 6, 2, 3, 1
Cheers,
Bijeet
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omal...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM
> > To: general@hadoop.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
> >
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a power
4,3,5,6,2,1
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jithendranath
wrote:
>
> 4,2,6,1,5,3
>
> :)
>
> -- Joijoide
>
>
> ***
> This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
> which is intended o
4,2,6,1,5,3
:)
-- Joijoide
***
This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
above. Any use of the informatio
When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of the
time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller than
what is displayed on Owen's link. Here's a similar page which shows all the
logos at a few different sizes:
http://people.apache.org/~atm/hadoop-powere
5,4,2,3,6,1
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
My vote 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 6
Thanks
Amareshwari
On 6/15/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote:
Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo.
Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powere
4,2,6,1,3,5
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On
My vote: 5 1 6 2 3 4
tl;dr regarding STV - since we're only selecting one winner, STV reduces to
instant-runoff voting.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
on a page, here:
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
let's use single transferable vote ( STV
http://en.wikipedia.o
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 19:46, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an
>> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying
>> that they are using Hadoop? You've patc
On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an
> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying
> that they are using Hadoop? You've patched Hadoop many times, should
> your employer not be able to s
On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we
> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that
> backported patches from trunk and security fixes are permitted.
Actually, the document is extremely clear t
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 18:15, Eli Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> All,
>> Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called
>> Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some
>> cleanup from Noirin and Shane
+1 on revision 12. Thanks for all your work on this, Steve. -C
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called
> Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some
> cleanup from Noirin and
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> In short, an Apache Hadoop release with a backport of PMC approved
>> code or critical security fix is not powered by Hadoop, it is Hadoop,
>> while a new product that contains or runs a
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called
> Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cleanup
> from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like a vote
On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> In short, an Apache Hadoop release with a backport of PMC approved
> code or critical security fix is not powered by Hadoop, it is Hadoop,
> while a new product that contains or runs atop Hadoop is powered by
> Hadoop.
>
> Reasonable?
I'd
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called
> Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cleanup
> from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like a vote
+1 - makes sense!
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writin
While we're looking at the wiki, could folks update
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions with whatever versions of
Hadoop they are using successfully?
Thanks.
P.S., yes, I'm thinking about upgrading ours. :p
+1.
great job Steve!
On Jun 15, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
>Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called
> Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cleanup
> from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base
On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:56 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called
> Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cleanup
> from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like a vote
> t
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze <
> s29752-hadoopgene...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> A few minor problems:
>> (1) I had committed MAPREDUCE-2588, however, an commit email was sent to
>> both
>> common-commits@ and mapreduce-c
All,
Steve Loughran has done some great work on defining what can be called
Hadoop at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Defining%20Hadoop. After some cleanup
from Noirin and Shane, I think we've got a really good base. I'd like a vote to
approve the content (at the current revision 12) and put th
On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Sanjay Radia wrote:
-1
I disagree with the proposed changes.
.
I will post a longer email explaining my position and my -1 more
clearly after I have had a chance to read all the emails carefully.
sanjay
Please don't take my -1 too strongly.
It was NOT me
On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Tom White wrote:
Looking at current usage in Hadoop, there are only 4 LimitedPrivate
references to HBase (the http, io.retry, ipc, and metrics packages in
Common), and 2 references to Pig (the two LineRecordReader classes in
MapReduce). The other LimitedPrivate refe
Steve, 'functional' or rather system & integration tests are the core of this
idea. If you're interested in a little history of this project feel free to
check
https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AVSlqgtwzvr9ZGdtNGM0OTJfMTRoYmRkMzhndA&hl=en_US&authkey=CLjMt_IN
that's basically the original
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Rottinghuis, Joep wrote:
> Project un-split definitely simplifies things.
>
> Todd, if people add a watch based on patches, would they not miss
> notifictions for those entries in an earlier phase of their lifecycle?
> For example when issues are just reported, dis
Project un-split definitely simplifies things.
Todd, if people add a watch based on patches, would they not miss notifictions
for those entries in an earlier phase of their lifecycle?
For example when issues are just reported, discussed and assigned, but no patch
has been attached yet?
A separa
For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom
White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build
and testing of the Apache Hadoop technologies, perhaps eventually to
have coordinated releases.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BigtopProposal
For
32 matches
Mail list logo
