Hi Folks,
While I have seen the wiki on which java versions to use currently to run
Hadoop, I have not seen any discussion about the roadmap of java version
compatibility with future hadoop versions.
Recently, Oracle retired the "Operating System Distributor License for
Java" (DLJ) [http://robila
I think requiring Java 7 is years off... I think most people have
doubts as to Java 7's stability until it's been adopted by a majority
of applications, and the new features aren't compelling enough to jump
ship, IMO.
-Todd
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> While I have see
I hate to sound like the folks who only recently stopped using 1.4, but I am
afraid that Todd is right on here.
The folks who are desperate for new features are being siphoned off by Scala
and Clojure which is leaving a core of recalcitrant termagants like me. I
think that it is going to take som
You know, I was looking around for Java EOL information a few weeks ago and
found this:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
I might not be reading closely enough, but that says Java 6 is EOL in 9 months.
In terms of major releases and getting things stable… that's just aroun
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Brian Bockelman wrote:
> You know, I was looking around for Java EOL information a few weeks ago and
> found this:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
>
> I might not be reading closely enough, but that says Java 6 is EOL in 9
> months. In te
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:49PM, Brian Bockelman wrote:
> You know, I was looking around for Java EOL information a few weeks ago and
> found this:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
>
> I might not be reading closely enough, but that says Java 6 is EOL in 9
> months. In
On 10/8/11 11:19 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote:
>I hate to sound like the folks who only recently stopped using 1.4, but I
>am
>afraid that Todd is right on here.
>
>The folks who are desperate for new features are being siphoned off by
>Scala
>and Clojure which is leaving a core of recalcitrant term
On 10/7/11 3:33 PM, "milind.bhandar...@emc.com"
wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>While I have seen the wiki on which java versions to use currently to run
>Hadoop, I have not seen any discussion about the roadmap of java version
>compatibility with future hadoop versions.
>
>Recently, Oracle retired the "O
On 10/9/11 9:22 PM, "Scott Carey" wrote:
>
>
>On 10/8/11 11:19 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote:
>
>>I hate to sound like the folks who only recently stopped using 1.4, but I
>>am
>>afraid that Todd is right on here.
>>
>>The folks who are desperate for new features are being siphoned off by
>>Scala
>>
>I believe you mean when will it be compatible with Java 7, not require it
>(based on all you mention above, other than the word 'required'). Is that
>the case?
I meant, "when will I be able to use some of the JDK 7 APIs in Hadoop code
?", which means JDK7 is required for Hadoop.
- milind
---
On 10/10/11 19:57, Scott Carey wrote:
What JRE (6 update ?) is planned to be used when testing 0.23 at scale?
Should JRE 7u2 also be tested? Both a new update to JRE 6 and 7 is due
out very soon. 0.23 will be code complete after that. If I had enough
resources and time, I'd test both the late
On 10/10/11 22:32, milind.bhandar...@emc.com wrote:
I believe you mean when will it be compatible with Java 7, not require it
(based on all you mention above, other than the word 'required'). Is that
the case?
I meant, "when will I be able to use some of the JDK 7 APIs in Hadoop code
?", whi
Steve,
>I would suggest moving up projects on the side first, layers on top,
>like your MPI-on-YARN stuff, where there is little or no installed base
>to worry about
That is exactly the project for which I though some of the new I/O
interfaces would reduce the amount of code, (plus auto-freed res
MR2 supports different JVMs for user-apps.
Arun
On Oct 11, 2011, at 10:31 AM,
wrote:
> Steve,
>
>> I would suggest moving up projects on the side first, layers on top,
>> like your MPI-on-YARN stuff, where there is little or no installed base
>> to worry about
>
> That is exactly the projec
Oh, that is very interesting ! Would I have to write my own
container-launcher for that ? Or does existing container launcher support
it ?
- Milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Greenplum Labs, EMC
(Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, and
do not necessarily represent the
On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:57 AM,
wrote:
> Oh, that is very interesting ! Would I have to write my own
> container-launcher for that ? Or does existing container launcher support
> it ?
>
In MR2 the command line for the container is the AM's own responsibility.
So, you can easily set whatever JA
On 10/11/11 4:18 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote:
>On 10/10/11 19:57, Scott Carey wrote:
>
>> What JRE (6 update ?) is planned to be used when testing 0.23 at scale?
>> Should JRE 7u2 also be tested? Both a new update to JRE 6 and 7 is due
>> out very soon. 0.23 will be code complete after that.
17 matches
Mail list logo
