Dear Nick,
Please add yourself to the proposal on the wiki as a mentor and/or PPMC
member and committer in the proposal table. I will call a VOTE next week
on Monday so if you can do it before then, thanks. Otherwise I'll do it
but I don't know your affiliation.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/27/13 10:34 PM
Hi All,
Thanks for the community feedback so far.
Since conversation is stabilizing, I am going to call for an official VOTE
starting on Monday early AM PT. I'll let it run through the whole week,
closing it around Friday EOD PT, and then we can go from there depending
on the outcome.
Thank you
On 23.01.2013 14:51, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> [ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!!
> [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
> [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
>
> So IPMCs please cast your votes!
+1
I still wish the source package was easier to find.
-- Brane
On 02.02.2013 21:36, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> SVN source tag
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami
On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> SVN source tag
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-150/
Since when do source packages not have to
On 02.02.2013 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
>> On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
>>> whimsy doesn
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
> On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
> >> I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
> > whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
>
> Th
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
>> I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
> whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for reminding me again ... silly me.
>> change the incubator.a.o
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote:
>
>> Author: grobmeier
>> Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013
>> New Revision: 1441762
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762&view=rev
>> Log:
>> updated status page for onami
>>
>> Modified:
>>
On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote:
> Author: grobmeier
> Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013
> New Revision: 1441762
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762&view=rev
> Log:
> updated status page for onami
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/onami.xml
>
> Modified: i
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
> On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
> >> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
> >> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
>> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
>> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
> The only supported way to get content to the web
On 01.02.2013 20:48, sebb wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Ja
13 matches
Mail list logo
