+1 (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Dave Lester
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" ,
"d...@ischool.berkeley.edu"
Date: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:08 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Aurora for Apache Incubation
>Since discussion
+1
--
Ross Allen
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Nirmal Fernando wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Benjamin Hindman <
> benjamin.hind...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester > >wrote:
> >
> > > Since discussion about t
Graduation community vote passed with 7 +1 from , which from those 6
are binding :
Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Ant Elder
Christian Grobmeier
Jukka Zitting
Luciano Resende
Alan D. Cabrera
Jie Huang (non-binding)
I'll check the status of the resolution and continue the process on the IPMC.
Thanks
+1
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Benjamin Hindman <
benjamin.hind...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester >wrote:
>
> > Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team
> recently
> > published a snapshot of the their source c
+1.
Milinda
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Ashish wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Dave Lester >wrote:
>
> > Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team
> recently
> > published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
> > https
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
> published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
> https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to
> become an i
+1
> On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester wrote:
>
> Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
> published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
> https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to
> become an incubated proje
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
> published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
> https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to
> become an incub
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks
Raminder
On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> +1 from me (binding).
>
> G'luck!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" ,
> "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Monday
Hey Dave
You are correct, but the mentor would have to have the ability to edit ldap
perms and hopefully an understanding that by enabling the hudson-jobadmin
karma that the user would be able to configure any job within jenkins and
not just that specific projects jobs. When enabling this for someo
A Mentoring question.
Some of the committers in a podling want to access Jenkins.
The instructions are here:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins#How_do_I_get_an_account
I take it that for a podling any of the mentors should take the role of the PMC
Chair and do this action. Please let me kn
Hi all,
This vote is canceled due to the problems found in this release (the
most important of which is that the content of LICENSE & NOTICE files
of the provided artifacts was found to be wrong).
We will fix all these issues and we will generate a new release
candidate.
My thanks to all who
On 26 September 2013 18:44, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> Thank you for checking our release.
> I think you clicked on the wrong tree link at our GIT repo.
> The source tree is:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mrql.git;a=tree;h=385ba2829bdf184886ac82b5db793f1264bb
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
> published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
> https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to
> become an incuba
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you for checking our release.
I think you clicked on the wrong tree link at our GIT repo.
The source tree is:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mrql.git;a=tree;h=385ba2829bdf184886ac82b5db793f1264bbcf3c;hb=385ba2829bdf184886ac82b5db793f1264bbcf3c
which corres
+1
Looking forward to being a part of Aurora and its incubation
-Jake
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
> Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
> published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
> https://github.com/twitter/auro
+1 for accepting Aurora. I'd like to contribute to aurora project as well.
Thanks
Sent from my iPad
Chan
> On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Dave Lester wrote:
>
> Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
> published a snapshot of the their source code on github
On 24 September 2013 13:44, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> Hello,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. MRQL is a
> query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed
> data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop, Hama, and Spark.
> This is our first release.
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to
become an incubated project.
The proposal is pasted below, and also available at:
https://
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Craig L Russell
> wrote:
> > < (for those interested in committership)
>
> IMO once the possible approaches are documented, we should require
> incoming podlings to choose one and indicate
This is a reminder that this vote is scheduled to close in about 24
hours out of 72 hours and we still have no binding votes from the
Incubator PMC.
This is our first release and we have spent a lot of time to migrate
our old source code to the Apache infrastructure and to adapt the
Apache policie
+1 from me (binding).
G'luck!
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" ,
"general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Monday, September 23, 2013 5:44 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incu
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> < those interested in committership)
IMO once the possible approaches are documented, we should require
incoming podlings to choose one and indicate which one in the
incubation proposal.
-Bertrand
---
23 matches
Mail list logo
