sorry for last mail, mistake from a lurker ;-)
## Manfred
Hi Richard, *
2011/6/6 Richard S. Hall
>
> On 6/6/11 2:48, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>> On 6/5/11 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/6/2011 1:06 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
[...]
>
> Disclaimer: I work for Oracle,
Hi Ralph,
2011/6/6 Ralph Goers :
>
> On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Manfred A. Reiter wrote:
>
[...]
>>
>> Under these conditions, I'll change my entry in the wiki.
>
done.
> Manfred,
>
> I wouldn't be so hasty. There are lots of opinions around he
Hi Simos, *,
2011/6/6 Simos Xenitellis :
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> On 6/6/11 10:41, Manfred A. Reiter wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Richard, *
>>>
>>> 2011/6/6 Richard S. Hall
>>>>
[...]
>>> Fact: Your emp
Hi all,
2011/6/7 Danese Cooper :
> Some of you know I was closely involved in the original open-sourcing of
> StarDivision code as OpenOffice.org. I'm also an Apache Member. Thought
> some of the current discussions could benefit from a tiny bit of (no axe to
> grind) history.
>
> This inform
Hi Flo,
2011/6/7 Florian Effenberger :
> Hi Rob,
>
> robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote on 2011-06-07 18.17:
>>
[...]
>
> let's forget about it.
>
> I'm not made out of sugar, as we have a saying in Germany.
an another one:
Der Klügere gibt nach.
> But, please,
> everyone, let's not focus on the past
Hi Ian, *
2011/6/7 Ian Lynch :
>>
>> and another one:
>> Der Klügere gibt nach.
>>
>> > But, please,
>> > everyone, let's not focus on the past, and let's not get personal or
>> > insulting. It simply doesn't help anyone.
>> >
>> > Peace,
>>
>> Gut gemacht. ;-)
>>
>
> Vorwärts und aufwärts
>
> (Ho
Hi André, *,
Am 7. Juni 2011 19:32 schrieb André Schnabel :
> Hi,
>
> Am 07.06.2011 17:51, schrieb Manfred A. Reiter:
>>
>> In Switzerland, there is the brand name "Open Office" as well. - So be
>> careful. ;-)
>
> Last time I checked (~2 years ago)
Dear -Rob, all,
2011/6/7 :
[...]
> We should be able to check the math from another direction. Microsoft
> claims something like 400 million Office users. Studies looking at OOo
> install share show approximately 10%. Pick some random number between 6
> and 12 months. Call it "mean time to
Hi -Rob
2011/6/7 :
> Danese Cooper wrote on 06/07/2011 03:43:56 PM:
>
>> robert_w...@us.ibm.com:
>>
>> Not surprisingly, you missed my point (or chose to ignore it). We at
>
> Honestly, your insult does surprise me.
>
>> Apache don't think that money is evil, but we also believe that
>> seeing
2011/6/7
>
> By my count we have now have over 60 individuals listed on as proposed
> committers for the Apache OpenOffice project. I think this is a
> respectable start, though obviously the project will need to have a strong
> commitment to recruiting additional developers and growing the proj
upps forgot ...
reunification if somehow possible ... to be even stronger ;-)
( please observe: in reunification we as germans have some experiences ;-) )
2011/6/9 Manfred A. Reiter :
[...]
> Interested in helping:
> Marketing, OOo in education sector, fundraising, documentation,
>
Hi Christoph,
2011/6/9 Christoph Jopp :
> Am 09.06.2011 18:32, schrieb Manfred A. Reiter:
>> upps forgot ...
>>
>> reunification if somehow possible ... to be even stronger ;-)
>> ( please observe: in reunification we as germans have some experiences ;-) )
>
>
> [ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+/- 0 (non binding)
I am still going back and forth, on whether or not.
against:
I understand very well most of the arguments from André
https://mail
> A (v)olunteer on the committer roster
me too, if allowed
M.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
15 matches
Mail list logo
