Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2

2009-06-08 Thread Roy Bamford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2009.06.08 16:48, Ferris McCormick wrote: [snip] > Very small point. There is a difference between "EAPI in the file > name > extension" and just "EAPI in the file name". I think the intent here > is > the latter, but it speaks of them interchang

Re:[gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2

2009-06-08 Thread Ferris McCormick
O > > Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:31:47 +0100 > From: Roy Bamford > To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2 > > > - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ladies and Gentlemen, > > I've spent some tim

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2

2009-06-08 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 23:31 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: > I've spent some time reading all of this years emails on GLEP55 and > added a few lines to version 1.5 which is the last offical version. Is there a specific reason not to include the "inherit eapi"[1][2] thing? IMHO this would fit best in

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 Version 2

2009-06-06 Thread Roy Bamford
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ladies and Gentlemen, I've spent some time reading all of this years emails on GLEP55 and added a few lines to version 1.5 which is the last offical version. The HTML version (not with the GLEP style sheet) is at http://xrl.us/bevrnb (my devspace)