Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Mick has a good point. I have two or three of the cheaper USB external
>> enclosures and only one of them was somewhat fast, it is USB 2.0 after
>> all. The other two logged a lot of errors in messages file about
>> resetting something. It was resetting so often that
> Mick has a good point. I have two or three of the cheaper USB external
> enclosures and only one of them was somewhat fast, it is USB 2.0 after
> all. The other two logged a lot of errors in messages file about
> resetting something. It was resetting so often that moving data to or
> from t
n952162 wrote:
> Okay, thank you, I'll try that (in (33 - 24) hours ;-) )
>
>
> On 11/02/19 16:40, Mick wrote:
>> On Saturday, 2 November 2019 15:15:31 GMT n952162 wrote:
>>> I'm getting 13k bps writing to a Toshiba 3T drive over a USB/Sata
>>> connection. It' take 33 hours to transfer a 200meg fi
Okay, thank you, I'll try that (in (33 - 24) hours ;-) )
On 11/02/19 16:40, Mick wrote:
On Saturday, 2 November 2019 15:15:31 GMT n952162 wrote:
I'm getting 13k bps writing to a Toshiba 3T drive over a USB/Sata
connection. It' take 33 hours to transfer a 200meg file.
I mounted it async but t
On Saturday, 2 November 2019 15:15:31 GMT n952162 wrote:
> I'm getting 13k bps writing to a Toshiba 3T drive over a USB/Sata
> connection. It' take 33 hours to transfer a 200meg file.
>
> I mounted it async but then see that ext4 ignores the async option on
> mounts.
>
> What am I doing wrong?
I'm getting 13k bps writing to a Toshiba 3T drive over a USB/Sata
connection. It' take 33 hours to transfer a 200meg file.
I mounted it async but then see that ext4 ignores the async option on
mounts.
What am I doing wrong?
6 matches
Mail list logo