Greg Rundlett wrote:
> I've been through the upgrade process and I'm still getting used to KDE 4.
>
> I'm frustrated by not being able to have a customized panel with
> direct launchers for all my favorite applications. For that matter,
> although I generally keep a clean desktop, I don't like
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Michael ODonnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1886349
That was amusing.
The "Professor Wikipedia" video was funny.
But "Font Conference" was *hilarious*!
Who knew there was actual creative, original content on CollegeH
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Anyone done it yet? Any, "Your system wont work for 3 days while
>> you frack with it" gotchas?
>> And most importantly, when the upgrade to
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1886349
ObLinux: the very last line...
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone done it yet? Any, "Your system wont work for 3 days while
> you frack with it" gotchas?
> And most importantly, when the upgrade to KDE 4.1 happens, can you
> get compiz back?
I am.. Underwhelmed.. I've neve
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After hearing about it, I did some research. It looks like KDE4 is
> using some OpenGL which some drivers have 'pretty big emotional
> issues' over. I'll let you know if I encounter any issues Greg.
> What's your card,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> both my systems use
>> nvidia or ati cards that are not supported yet (although they were
>> supported under kde 3.x)
> WTF does KDE have to do with
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> both my systems use
> nvidia or ati cards that are not supported yet (although they were
> supported under kde 3.x)
WTF does KDE have to do with one's video card? Isn't that the X server's job?
Linux gets closer and
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Greg Rundlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been through the upgrade process and I'm still getting used to KDE 4.
Yea, I tried 4.0 when it came out, and reverted back to 3.x as I
didn't feel it was up to par quite yet. I was hoping 4.1 did some
catching up.
I've been through the upgrade process and I'm still getting used to KDE 4.
I'm frustrated by not being able to have a customized panel with
direct launchers for all my favorite applications. For that matter,
although I generally keep a clean desktop, I don't like the fact that
KDE4 won't let me p
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Mark Komarinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/12/2008 02:44 PM, Thomas Charron wrote:
>> Anyone done it yet? Any, "Your system wont work for 3 days while
>> you frack with it" gotchas?
> Upgrading my desktop was quite painless - we have a local mirror, so it
On 11/12/2008 02:44 PM, Thomas Charron wrote:
> Anyone done it yet? Any, "Your system wont work for 3 days while
> you frack with it" gotchas?
>
I had plain Ubuntu installed on my laptop and desktop. I think I chose
the wrong mirror for the laptop and it told me there were no packages to
i
Anyone done it yet? Any, "Your system wont work for 3 days while
you frack with it" gotchas?
And most importantly, when the upgrade to KDE 4.1 happens, can you
get compiz back?
--
-- Thomas
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlu
>> Since some of those parititions might be (as they are in our case)
>> components of a software RAID and since the act of mounting them
>> causes uncoordinated modfications to the mirrors behind MD's back,
>> we're less than pleased with this "helpful" behavior.
> [...]
>Any idea how to recover
Michael ODonnell wrote:
> ...
> Since some of those
> parititions might be (as they are in our case) components
> of a software RAID and since the act of mounting them causes
> uncoordinated modfications to the mirrors behind MD's back,
> we're less than pleased with this "helpful" behavior.
>
> Bu
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> Ben spent tons of hours working on our server recovery and even took a
> day off of work to get it back in action. He's the guy who really keeps
> our online presence running and we'd still be dead in the water without
> his efforts.
>
> I'm collecting funds here:
>
>
> Note to self: Avoid CentOS live discs.
...or at least be careful: I don't claim that *all* discs
created using that LiveCD-creator kit are b0rken and (to your
point in a previous msg) the standard installation CDs and DVDs
do seem to work just fine. But the ones I generated in-house
definite
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Michael ODonnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On machines with IDE-connected drives ...
> ... machines with SATA-connected DVD drives ...
Sheesh, that don't leave much. What good is a live CD that can't
actually boot on 99% of the computers out there?
> ... co
>
> So I've been looking for something that'll allow me to create a
> new bootable/live/rescue DVD that I can base the new installer
> on, and I'd love to find something as simple and flexible as
> the Timo's kit; something that just starts a kernel and boots
> up to a console login prompt with a m
>> The CentOS5.2 LiveCD-creator kit looked promising until we found
>> bugs that prevent it from running on our bleeding-edge hardware.
>
> I'm curious. Got time to provide any details? In particular, why
>would the regular CentOS install disc work for you when the "live"
>disc would not? Are
> WTF is /sbin/loader ?
>
>It executes early during startup when booting from an ISO. The
>only stuff I can find online about this apparently pivotal item
>is lots of other people also asking questions, but no answers.
Ah. I used "strings" on the /sbin/loader file from the ISO
and divined th
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 11:08 -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Michael ODonnell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The CentOS5.2 LiveCD-creator kit looked promising until we found
> > bugs that prevent it from running on our bleeding-edge hardware.
>
> I'm curious. Got ti
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Michael ODonnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The CentOS5.2 LiveCD-creator kit looked promising until we found
> bugs that prevent it from running on our bleeding-edge hardware.
I'm curious. Got time to provide any details? In particular, why
would the regular
I'm working on a product that's currently based on RHEL3 and
whose installer is based on the venerable Timo's Rescue CD kit.
We've ported our product to a more current version of Linux and
when I went to port the installer I discovered that development
on Timo's kit stopped after 2004 and it still
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:04:10 -0500
> > From: "Thomas Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Did I just get a gnhlug mail again? :-D
> I have to confess, I was getting used to not receiving GNHLUG
> posts. :)
> When I saw the subject o
P.S.:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I sincerely appreciate the gesture, I think your idea of my
> effort paints me in a better light than the reality.
In lieu of donations to me, I would like to request that people in a
giving mood send any donati
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben spent tons of hours working on our server recovery and even took a
> day off of work to get it back in action.
While I sincerely appreciate the gesture, I think your idea of my
effort paints me in a better light tha
27 matches
Mail list logo
