2011/7/15 Nohemi Fernandez
>
> On that note, if anyone can tell me why
> “this.button.add_style_pseudo_class('grayed')” doesn't work inside of
> “Main.overview.connect('hidden'” call, but does work outside of it I'd be
> much obliged! (I've already checked that a remove_style isn't being called).
Onscreen Keyboard- Weekly Report 08
This week has been about fixing up the keyboard for GNOME master release. As
you have probably noticed there is now a “Screen Keyboard” addition to the
a11y menu where you can turn the keyboard off/on. To prepare for the release
I did the following: edited the j
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Federico Mena Quintero
> > wrote:
> [...]
> >> - Gnome-shell wants to have a coherent design. Still, it needs to
> >> accept that not ever
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Federico Mena Quintero
> wrote:
[...]
>> - Gnome-shell wants to have a coherent design. Still, it needs to
>> accept that not everyone's needs are equal.
>
> It doesn't need to.
Is above nice try to st
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 13:54 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>
> > They're three separate actors by design, because it's *really hard* to
> > do it otherwise. I assume what you really want is a method or
> > something that will hide
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 23:26 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> what I personally don't understand is why are you complaining on the
> shell list instead of filing bugs against the apps that have windows
> too high to fit. how is the shell, or Gnome 3 for that matter,
> responsible for apps behaving ba
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 13:54 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> They're three separate actors by design, because it's *really hard* to
> do it otherwise. I assume what you really want is a method or
> something that will hide all three for you. I doubt you're going to
> get that API: it doesn't real
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Jaimon Jose wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote, On 07/15/2011 11:34 AM:
>>
>>> Just kill the gnome-shell process: 'killall gnome-shell' is an easy way.
>>> It will auto-respawn.
>>
>> I tried that. It doe
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Jaimon Jose wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote, On 07/15/2011 11:34 AM:
>
>> Just kill the gnome-shell process: 'killall gnome-shell' is an easy way.
>> It will auto-respawn.
>
> I tried that. It doesn't respawn when the process itself is not
> responding...
It'd be g
Adam Williamson wrote, On 07/15/2011 11:34 AM:
> Just kill the gnome-shell process: 'killall gnome-shell' is an easy way.
> It will auto-respawn.
I tried that. It doesn't respawn when the process itself is not
responding...
--jaimon
___
gnome-shell-lis
On 07/15/2011 07:57 AM, Jaimon Jose wrote:
> Is there a way I can restart or send a signal to restart gnome-shell
> from a terminal?. I noticed that my gnome-shell freezes or crashes at
> times (tried to debug a little bit attaching gdb to gnome-shell. But,
> that didn't reveal much) and I don't h
On 2011-07-15 at 09:56, Allan E. Registos wrote:
> I really do not think you should expect all users to just file bugs.
I don't expect all users to file bugs. if past history is of any
significance, I don't expect more than a quarter of the users to file
any bugs.
I do expect users that find this
Adam Williamson writes:
> any reasonably smart user *knows* which of the things running on their
> system should be using 100% CPU for five minutes, and which shouldn't
> - but I think it's extremely difficult to figure out heuristically.
Right. I already use the verynice daemon to assign a low
13 matches
Mail list logo
