This sucks great time, now that devmode plugins have been abandoned
(surprise!), and Super Dev Mode was forced onto us, xsiframe became a must,
and all the GWT libraries and apps that use script tags are not working
anymore. What's wrong with document.write anyway? I'm really angry now with
Goo
Hi All, I really see big potential in new and shiny editor framework. Works
pretty well so far, but I noticed, that it doesn't work when I use
interfaces for my views. Typical example: you describe your view as an
interface:
interface FooView extends Editor { ... }
then instance of this get in
There is already support for HTTP headers in XHR in GWT, it's the
method I posted. And it works with all major browsers. The problem I
guess is that you probably have issues with using RequestBuilder class
from your Spring Roo app.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
I think you're looking for annotated bindings:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1221920/getting-multiple-guice-singletons-of-the-same-type
I guess toInstance() doesn't work in GWT, but you can still use regular
to()
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
Julio, I think your last response was a bit aggresive. Watch it. As of
your problem with overlay types, what you describe should work
flawlessly, and it does, I'm using JavaScriptObject daily in my GWT
projects, and never seen such behavior. Please try something like
$wnd.console.log(this) in your
I assume you mean Spring Roo + GWT? In that case I can't help you,
heard of it before but never used it, quickly checked it out, seems
like lots of scaffolding is going on there, so you will have to
customize. RequestBuilder class can make requests of any method btw (as
long as browser supports tha
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.1/com/google/gwt/http/client/RequestBuilder.html#setHeader(java.lang.String,
java.lang.String)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to goog
There aren't any performance implications, it only can get faster I
guess. You would need to wrap these Closure objects into
JavaScriptObject, which is very tedious and time consuming thing to
do, and not really rewarding, because those widgets are realy simple.
IMHO, there is great overlap between
You can't, what you do here is that you create new (and empty)
JavaScriptObject, and cast it to your type. It seems that you think
you're copying the object, but that's certainly not true. I'm not sure
what the problem is, if you need to pass that instance to another
class, you can do it without an
Awesome! Saved my ass too, thanks a ton
On Oct 20, 3:45 pm, wolfgang wrote:
> solved the problem. I changed the order in java build path (order and
> export), so that GWT SDK is now on Top.
> everything compiles without exception.
>
> On 15 Okt., 12:02, wolfgang wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Sorry fo
There is a big demand for this plugin. And unsatisfied :(
On Nov 9, 11:34 am, csillag wrote:
> On okt. 26, 00:54, slowpoison wrote:
>
> > On Sep 14, 8:21 am, John Tamplin wrote:
>
> > > I am working on it right now. I have it working on FF40, but I am
> > > still trying to get it where one XPI
Are these first signs of GWT being forgotten? That there is less
resources being allocated for GWT team??
On Sep 14, 4:44 pm, "a...@mechnicality.com"
wrote:
> John, Chris
>
> Its now 09/14/2010. Please could you update us on the status of this
> work? The plugin still doesn't seem to work with FF
Hi all,
is there any progress on this issue? FF4 is almost done and we're
stuck with developing on FF3.6 which is slow as hell on MacOS, and
there's no Chromium plugin.
On Sep 8, 1:07 am, csillag wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On aug. 11, 18:06, John Tamplin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Hi all,
I got a problem using CssResource, after laborious convert from legacy
CSS, everything works perfectly in gecko/webkit. However, IE loads/
sees only a couple of my CSS rules, like 5% of the whole stylesheet,
which effectively destroys whole application. Debuggin from
ensureInjected() call
59 pm, Michael W wrote:
> Skrat,
>
> Are you talking about the Google Autofill, Roboform Autofill feature?
> Which means browser remembers your form entry and next time once you
> click Autofill from browser, the form is refilled.
>
> Or just want to prepopulate your form processed b
Hmm, that script inserted forms problem, might be fatal.
I guess security should be handled by browsers, and all non-XHR forms
are leveraging this feature. please
On Dec 22, 3:07 pm, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2:53 pm, skrat wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I am curio
Hi all,
I am curious about, how can one enable, or force a browser to remember
value inside text inputs (TextBox) values. In browsers it basically
works when you submit a form, then all values are remembered, and next
time you open that form, you will be provided with autocomplete box.
All major b
I also got trouble with DockLayoutPanel and IE6, and it doesn't have
anything with Unit.EM. I use Unit.PX, and in FF/Safari I got proper
styles on child widgets, that is
right: 0px; bottom: 0px; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;
and in IE6
there is something containing width:32px , how's
r - and hence things will work.
>
> The only pattern that works well is Googles recommended "Async Package
> Patter". See this
> presentation<http://dl.google.com/io/2009/pres/Th_1045_TheStoryofyourCompile-Readi...>.
>
> --Sri
>
> 2009/10/25 skrat
>
>
>
I'm trying to split my code using sort of proxies, where I reuse
parametrized RunAsyncCallback class. This class has basically just
reference to Gin Provider of the real module class. When I use this
for loading one module, it works perfectly, and I'm getting nice and
correct location of split po
20 matches
Mail list logo
