Well that was easy, chears :)
On Apr 7, 7:46 am, Vitali Lovich wrote:
> DOM.toString(RootPanel.get().getElement())
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Darkflame wrote:
>
> > As a mater of interest semi-relivent to this, Is it possible to "burn
> > out" GWT webpages into static html? (obviou
DOM.toString(RootPanel.get().getElement())
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Darkflame wrote:
>
> As a mater of interest semi-relivent to this, Is it possible to "burn
> out" GWT webpages into static html? (obviously losing
> interaction...just taking a snapshot of the current state of the dom
> a
As a mater of interest semi-relivent to this, Is it possible to "burn
out" GWT webpages into static html? (obviously losing
interaction...just taking a snapshot of the current state of the dom
and expressing the html nesscery to reproduce it).
I mean, I guess you could cut and paste out of firebug
There are discussions about this (SEO) on this list, have a search for
them.
But basically, you'll want to embed the information you want indexed
into your host pages. This is not a GWT limitation but rather a
limitation of any web application that uses DOM modification to
present content.
any alternative or solution to this ?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:20 PM, djd wrote:
>
> Current crawl bots ignore flash and javascript.
> So if your web app is completely built in GWT (the default behavior
> when creating a project with projectCreator is to create a single HTML
> file with a singl
Current crawl bots ignore flash and javascript.
So if your web app is completely built in GWT (the default behavior
when creating a project with projectCreator is to create a single HTML
file with a single link to a .nocache.js files which is actually your
entry point for entire app), all content
does my GWT website gets indexed same as any other (non GWT) website..?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.
In case it's any help to anyone, this is how I think I'll solve the
indexing problem.
My wife has a web site on which she sells various things, the
descriptions of which are stored in a database. I re-jigged her
website as a way to learn GWT. She was quite keen to have the GWT
version, but pretty
Quick answer for me - no, never expected it to be indexed so there was
never any wondering
The trade off that Eric mentions was always made pretty clear by the
search engines
and in my case, we decided to render pages we wanted indexed outside
of GWT and
we have a parallel application structure to
Following discussion on indexing AJAX applications I have to ask if
those who wonder why their GWT applications cannot be indexed if you
expect search engines to index Java applets or Flash out there on the
web, or compressed files and executable files? And if somehow GWT
application get indexed w
Here are some official answers on the subject:
Notes on Ajax:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=81766
Don't be evil, Guidelines for Webmasters:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:04 AM, jos wrote:
>
>
Why does the GWT compiler not create a version for the google index
bot that contains only static content that can be indexed? When you
can compile from Java to Javascript there must be a way to compile it
in a static html content. Where you can exclude the whole grafical
stuff.
--~--~-~--
Eric
Just to make sure I understood your last point, we should be looking
for a search bot indicator
like a URL parameter or something, and if we see it we should render
our page as statically and
flat as possible?
Thanks,
jos
On Jan 24, 5:01 am, Eric Ayers wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
> I understand yo
Hi Bryan
I recently had the chance to speak with some good SEO types and the
subject
of javascript did come up. The bottom line is don't hold your breath
waiting for this to happen
in any search engine.
I think its easy to appreciate how difficult it would be for a search
engine to do this.
You'
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the heads up on that
I appreciate there's a few more 'gotchas' than my admittedly
simplistic scenario, and I'm sure there's lots of big brains at Google
thinking about the problem.
Thanks again,
Bryan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
Hi Bryan,
I understand your frustration. Unfortunately, due to the extremely
competitive nature of web search, we here at Google can't say a lot about
the Google bot or the roadmap for future improvements. Indexing JavaScript
apps is a general problem not particular to GWT. Obviously, this is on
That's the point of my query/question, Why can't the Google bot
understand Javascript ? As I said originally, using Firebug I can see
what the Javascript has rendered to the DOM, so there's no good reason
the Google bot can;t do the same. Granted, it cannot follow links or
any of the possibly unli
AFAIK, the Google bot (or any other bot for that matter), does not
understand Javascript. Therefore, if your entire website is built with
GWT, all the Google bot will see is a javascript import for the
nocache file. You'll have to search the group for Search engine
optimization to get some ideas o
I think its possible exactly how you discribed.
Its certainly how I planned to do it, and it seems to work.
bryanb wrote:
> I've searched the forum on this topic, and it appears the only way to
> get a GWT site indexed is by some horrible hacks.
>
> If I use Firebug with Firefox, I can get the H
I've searched the forum on this topic, and it appears the only way to
get a GWT site indexed is by some horrible hacks.
If I use Firebug with Firefox, I can get the HTML displayed that the
Javascript is writing to the DOM, so this means it should be possible
for the Google search bot to do a simi
Is there any progress on this subject?
On Oct 10, 5:07 pm, "Sumit Chandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> For the time being, there isn't anything that GWT can do to especially
> address the search indexing problem for Ajax applications. This is a problem
> inherent to how Ajax wo
Hello everyone,
For the time being, there isn't anything that GWT can do to especially
address the search indexing problem for Ajax applications. This is a problem
inherent to how Ajax works versus current search engine capabilities in
crawling and indexing web content.
That said, Ian's solution i
The GWT developer guide should definitely contain a section about
this:
1) How can GWT-applications be made search engine friendly?
2) How can GWT-applications be made ADSense friendly?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribe
You're barking up the wrong tree here. GWT is for writing
AJAX/RIA/whatever-you-want-to-call-them applications. It makes the
obnoxious JS bits tolerable. JS applications are inherently unfriendly
to search engines. You can overcome that (as Ian has done) but it
isn't going to be as simple as tossi
Maybe you don't care about your site being indexed by I bet you the
majority of people do.
I've seen Ian's example and he has done a great job but it should not
be that complicated. Any comments from the GWT folks?
On Sep 4, 1:38 pm, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 20
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:24 PM, JeanV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have searched and only found one old thread discussing how to allow
> a GWT-based site to be indexed by search engines. Basically the
> solution involved a convoluted way of creating 2 different sites.
>
There's been plenty o
I have searched and only found one old thread discussing how to allow
a GWT-based site to be indexed by search engines. Basically the
solution involved a convoluted way of creating 2 different sites.
You would think that Google would develop a toolkit that is compatible
with its search engine. Wh
27 matches
Mail list logo
