Hey Pierre,
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:18:39 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Thanks for the details.
>
> Here is the full backtrace when I attempt to build sbcl-slime-swank
> with PR #433 (https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/433):
>
[...]
> ;
> /gnu/store/223af099vkzml89z1y8m654clsja8xph-sbcl-s
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> I commented specifically on Leo’s statement about build debugging on
>> Cuirass:
>>
>> “I don't actually do any build debugging with Berlin yet because I
>> don't know how to use the interface effe
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I commented specifically on Leo’s statement about build debugging on
> Cuirass:
>
> “I don't actually do any build debugging with Berlin yet because I
> don't know how to use the interface effectively.”
>
> This did not so
Thanks for the details.
Here is the full backtrace when I attempt to build sbcl-slime-swank with PR #433
(https://github.com/slime/slime/pull/433):
--8<---cut here---start->8---
> ./pre-inst-env guix build -K sbcl-slime-swank
;;; note: source file /home/ambreva
Hey Tim,
thank you so much for helping with GHC!
> To summarize, there are three problems with the original patch:
>
> 1. it uses “ld.bfd” instead of “ld” (skipping the wrapper);
> 2. it references native tools instead of target tools; and
> 3. it requires certain tools to be available fr
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> I can remove one of the build machines from Berlin.
>
> would this not aggravate the problem with the availability of substitutes?
> As I understand it, then we would have two separate machines, e
Alex Kost writes:
> Hello,
>
> Let me announce Emacs-Build-Farm – Emacs interface for Hydra and Cuirass
> (build farms used by Nix and Guix). This is a successor of
> "guix-hydra-…" code from ‘emacs-guix’ package.
>
> It can be installed from Guix (after "guix pull"):
>
> guix package -i emacs
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I can remove one of the build machines from Berlin.
would this not aggravate the problem with the availability of substitutes?
As I understand it, then we would have two separate machines, each of
which would build the same
Hello,
Let me announce Emacs-Build-Farm – Emacs interface for Hydra and Cuirass
(build farms used by Nix and Guix). This is a successor of
"guix-hydra-…" code from ‘emacs-guix’ package.
It can be installed from Guix (after "guix pull"):
guix package -i emacs-build-farm
In short, Emacs-Build-
Hi Mark,
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> I think you are overreacting and I really don’t think the sarcastic
>> response is justified. This kind of communication is very demotivating
>> to me.
>
> Believe it or not, I wasn't conscious of the fact that I was being
> sarcastic or hostile. Sorry abo
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:42:27 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
[...]
> One thing I'd like to understand about Common Lisp packages in Guix,
> if you can shed some light on this: the build system uses ASDF to
> "bundle compile" the entire package into a
> single /gnu/store/…-PACKAGE/lib/P
11 matches
Mail list logo