On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:13:24PM -0500, zachary rosen wrote:
> No that is incorrect. The name being voted on is the "network name". We
> will decide after this what the name of the "Dev Community" will be. DFA
> will have the final say on the name for the "Community Kit".
"... as they market
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:03:52PM -0400, jim sloan wrote:
> So the name that is being discussed and voted on is for item (3) the dev
> group, who may be hosted independent of DFA, and not the Public name
> where local groups will be directed to download the kit.
Not quite, unless *I* missed som
> So then what is the discussion on domain names about?
>
OK, it's time for my daily Homer moment: DOH!!!
I must have skipped over a post or to today; I thought the issue was domain
extensions for the general public sites (I think that I thought anyway...);
if it only pertains to the "network hop
Thank You! This sets it straight...
> 3) and the 'thing' it's building -- the interconnected web
> of Dean related sites -- has it's name up for poll as we speak; some
> suggestions are DeanSpace and DeanWeb. As Zack notes, consider it a
> brand... and remember that Tide isn't sold by "Tide
hout
> > Internet Organizing & Outreach
> > Dean for America
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Meetup at http://www.deanforamerica.com/meetup
> > Get local at http://action.deanforamerica.com
> > Contribute at http://www.deanforamerica.com/contribute
> >
tribute at http://www.deanforamerica.com/contribute
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of CMR
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hackers] How about deancountry.com?
>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:49:40PM -0400, Shannon Little wrote:
> Actually, you're wrong about domain name rules. I just looked it up
> at www.101domain.com/rules.htm and according to the rules it is
> actually .net that should be used for companies involving the internet.
> .org should be us
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:55:39AM -0700, CMR wrote:
> > That some people are morons doesn't make being a moron the right thing to
> do.
>
> we're agreed on the above point; we just disagree on what's "right" and what
> strategy's "moron"ic
Because we disagree does not mean that there is *not* a
ere-->
- Original Message -
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: [hackers] How about deancountry.com?
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:18:45AM -0700, CMR wrote:
> > &
Actually, you're wrong about domain name rules. I just looked it up at www.101domain.com/rules.htm and according to the rules it is actually .net that should be used for companies involving the internet. .org should be used for non-profits. .com is for commercial AND personal sites.
Here are t
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:18:45AM -0700, CMR wrote:
> > Attorney: "But you registered your domain name in the .com region, a
> region
> > reserved for commercial entities. You dod realize that this was the
> > implication of .com, right"
> >
> > Yes, attorneys will do stupid things like that in c
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:37:22PM -0400, Zephyr Teachout wrote:
> Hey, no knocking country!
We're not *wrong*... we're not *sorry*...
and it's probably gonna happen again.
:-)
> For names, I since we'll host the kits somewhere on DFA.com, the public
> name of the website service will be diff.
> Neither a4d, h4d (however you expand that), nor dfa are commercial; we
don't
> *belong* in .com -- and there might be legal ramifications.
>
> Attorney: "But you registered your domain name in the .com region, a
region
> reserved for commercial entities. You dod realize that this was the
> impli
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:05:12PM -0400, Shannon Little wrote:
> The name is available and I posted on the forum poll as to why I think
> it would be a good choice. People tend to associate web sites with
> .com most of all (especially the average web user) and it might be
> better to go for s
ROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hackers] How about deancountry.com?
Subject: [hackers] How about deancountry.com?
> The name is available and I posted on the forum poll as to why I think
> it would be a good choice. People tend to associate web sites with
> .com most of all (especially the average web
If it is your fav i can add it to the poll :)
-Zack
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Shannon Little wrote:
> The name is available and I posted on the forum poll as to why I think
> it would be a good choice. People tend to associate web sites with
> .com most of all (especially the average web user) and i
Subject: [hackers] How about deancountry.com?
> The name is available and I posted on the forum poll as to why I think
> it would be a good choice. People tend to associate web sites with
> .com most of all (especially the average web user) and it might be
> better to go for some
The name is available and I posted on the forum poll as to why I think
it would be a good choice. People tend to associate web sites with
.com most of all (especially the average web user) and it might be
better to go for something with a .com domain. Just my two cents.
18 matches
Mail list logo
