nsard
> Date: Thursday, June 5, 2014 at 11:42 AM
> To: Matt Glasser
> Cc: Donna Dierker , "
> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume
>
> ok, do you have applied dilation to the mask before inverting it? can't
&
edu>>,
"hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>"
mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume
ok, do you have applied dilation to the mask before inverting it? can't there
be side effect betwee
onna Dierker <do...@brainvis.wustl.edu>, "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume
ok, do you have applied dilation to the mask before inverting it? can't there be side effect between aliased vo
er , "
> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Even if it is marginal a certain number of fibers are in the cortical and
> ROIs gray matter as assessed by fdt_paths.nii, I think I already
> mentioned this
out that.
Peace,
Matt.
From: basile pinsard <basile.pins...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, June 5, 2014 at 7:42 AM
To: Donna Dierker <do...@brainvis.wustl.edu>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels
tt.
>
> From: basile pinsard
> Date: Thursday, June 5, 2014 at 7:42 AM
> To: Donna Dierker
> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume
>
> Many thanks for the answers
>
> @Timothy
> I know that probtrackx2 supp
t 7:42 AM
To: Donna Dierker <do...@brainvis.wustl.edu>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gifti labels to volume
Many thanks for the answers
@Timothy
I know that probtrackx2 support surfaces but I did not ma
Many thanks for the answers
@Timothy
I know that probtrackx2 support surfaces but I did not manage to make it
work without hectic results (fiber crossing the surfaces used as stop,
combinatorial counting of endpoints ... ), even if FSL seems the most able
to process multi-shell data.
@Donna
I alr
As far as I know, caret5's multi-fiducial mapping is volume->surface rahter
than surface->volume.
The caret_command method works, but you'll need to convert HCP surf.gii ->
caret5 coord/topo (caret_command -file-convert -sc …). And your label.gii or
func.gii will need to be converted, too (car
Workbench currently doesn't have a way to do that. caret5 has a way to do
this (caret_command -surface-to-volume, and there is another method called
multi-fiducial mapping, though I'm not sure how to invoke it), though you
may need to do some file conversion.
On a side note, FSL's probtrackx does
Hi hcp experts,
I was wondering if anybody knew a way to map back to volume the values in a
surface gifti from HCP data. The main interest is to create ROIs on the
surface using this topological constraint and then send it back to volume
for let say a tractography software which does not support s
11 matches
Mail list logo
