there is a big difference betweeen it happening and it being reproduced.
If someone can find what causes it..
Im sure it can be fixed.
and i don't mean it is caused by running a server for 5 days then it might
happen,
I mean you send this packet to rcon and it happens.
- Original Message -
Elmer Fudd wrote:
kissing burns 26 calories. send this to 15 people in the next 15
minutes and your crush will give you a lil somethin` special tmw..
how about kissing 15 people in the next 15 minutes instead of spamming
them ...
___
To unsubscribe, edit
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
There are a few admin tools out now that Im using as rcon is pretty close to
usless.
http://www.thelostsite.co.uk/index.html
hondaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The RCON bug is reproducible by the whole world. All except Valve.
Alfred said th
The RCON bug is reproducible by the whole world. All except Valve.
Alfred said they cant/wont fix it because they cant/wont find it.
Andy Hill wrote:
Hi albert, any chance on an update to this ? As also my source servers keep
losing the TCP connection, and only a restart will bring the rcon workin
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
my $file_list = `find . -follow -name \*log`;
my (%player,%ip,%ban);
my $bans = `cat /gaming/test_logs/masterbanlist.cfg`;
foreach my $file (split '\n',$file_list) {
open(FILE,"<$file");
while() {
if ( my ($uid,$ip) = /<(\d+)>.*address
\"(\S+
Hi albert, any chance on an update to this ? As also my source servers keep
losing the TCP connection, and only a restart will bring the rcon working
again.
Which as you must understand is very frustrating for my self, and the clans
who have rented servers off me.
Thanks
Andy
-Original Mess
The real problema is the nosteam hack that allows the punks to come back
with new steam ids ad infinitum.
If they payed for each one of them, I'd be more than happy to ban all of
them and it wouldn't bother me.
What bothers me is that I can't rely on something that always worked
before (banning b
Hell no!!! HL2DM admins don't get a merry crimbo either!
Regards,
Matt White
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian A. Stumm
Sent: 14 December 2004 19:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Mr E Scrooge.
tubesock wrote:
> Sorry to come in mid-discussion, but does CD work with Source now?
>
> Thanks,
> Tube
>
Unfortunately not, we've been talking about it, and if we can get enough
time set aside for the coders, we'll try to implement it.
---
Mike "DaiTengu" Miller
Operations Director: United Adm
If you are paying attention to the origin of this thread, the reason for
this script is that banned users are returning again and again with a
different steamid on some peoples servers. So the likelyhood of "banned
user returning to your server in a future with the same IP he was banned
before." i
This chance is as remote as the chance of the banned user returning to your
server in a future with the same IP he was banned before. You are more likely
banning legit users trying to connect with such bad luck to have one of this
IP's instead of the original cheater.
Temporal banning should be
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Ruffneck wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Coule someone tell me what the mininum system requirements are to run a
> dedicated linux CS server ?
>
> Here at work they are migrating the old servers to new ones, and so it
> happens that this friday I will have 7 x Pentium 3 866 Mhz with 10
Hi all,
Coule someone tell me what the mininum system requirements are to run a
dedicated linux CS server ?
Here at work they are migrating the old servers to new ones, and so it
happens that this friday I will have 7 x Pentium 3 866 Mhz with 1024 MB
RAM running Redhat at my disposal :)
They ar
13 matches
Mail list logo