Re: [hlds_linux] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip)

2005-03-13 Thread List Keeper
It certainly is for Source (SRCDS), but for HLDS you have to use +ip. Perhaps it's just a bug, but on Windows HLDS -ip would not bind to the specified IP; instead it would bind to the primary/main IP on the dedicated server. I know this is the Linux list, but perhaps my experiences with the

RE: [hlds_linux] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip)

2005-03-13 Thread David Fencik
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com; hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip) It certainly is for Source (SRCDS), but for HLDS you have to use +ip. Perhaps it's just a bug, but on Windows HLDS -ip would not bind to the specified IP; instead

Re: [hlds_linux] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip)

2005-03-13 Thread List Keeper
] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip) It certainly is for Source (SRCDS), but for HLDS you have to use +ip. Perhaps it's just a bug, but on Windows HLDS -ip would not bind to the specified IP; instead it would bind to the primary/main IP on the dedicated server. I know this is the Linux list

Re: [hlds_linux] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip)

2005-03-13 Thread ploc
@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip) It certainly is for Source (SRCDS), but for HLDS you have to use +ip. Perhaps it's just a bug, but on Windows HLDS -ip would not bind to the specified IP; instead it would bind to the primary/main IP on the dedicated

Re: [hlds_linux] question on if this is normal (-ip/+ip)

2005-03-13 Thread Chris Jones
Original message from ploc: yeah gave me a error that it couldn't bind to that ip or something I figured it was just that im using cable threw a router so figured it couldn't bind it cause the ip wasn't actually accessable threw that computer or that computer didn't know the ip as its own