On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 23:17 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
> Targeted toward x86 users. Not one mention of z/OS. Disgusting. :-(
Not only, but also ...
Try getting the datasheet from that link.
Who teaches these people about how to construct (meaningful) web pages.
Bah
---
Hi Rick,
Thanks for this valuable information.
Regards.
Mürsel Taşgın
BT Sistem Yönetimi
Yönetici Yardımcısı
Akbank Genel Müdürlüğü
Sabancı Center 34330, İstanbul
Tel: + 90 212 385 53 85
Faks: +90 212 282 62 76
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [ma
Hi Bill,
1 VS Cobol Program is actually OS/VS Cobol (amblist shows 5740CB103 as
compiler version). Program compilation details are like:
AMODE(24),RMODE(24), NOT-RENT, RES
Thanks and regards.
Mürsel Taşgın
BT Sistem Yönetimi
Yönetici Yardımcısı
Akbank Genel Müdürlüğü
Sabancı Center 34330, İstanb
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Introducing the System z10 Business Class:
http://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/25584.wss
Targeted toward x86 users. Not one mention of z/OS. Disgusting. :-(
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 9
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
There was also the secondary use of the high bit to signal AM24 vs
AM31 in addresses used for branching to/from subroutines. This
required replacing BALR with BASR and BR with BSM to do the AM Mode
Switch.
And, the low-order bit of the address now indicates switchin
Introducing the System z10 Business Class:
http://www.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/25584.wss
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan / Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
At 22:00 -0500 on 10/20/2008, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re:
Addressing Scheme with 64 vs 63 bits:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:31:08 -0500, W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:00:48 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought 31-bit was for compatibility with existing ex
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:31:08 -0500, W. Kevin Kelley wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:00:48 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I thought 31-bit was for compatibility with existing exploitation
>>of the sign bit; ...
>
>Nope, it was the use of a X'80' in the high-order byte of a ful
> Nope, it was the use of a X'80' in the high-order byte of a fullword to >
> terminate a variable-length parameter list (of fullwords).
Isn't that the "existing exploitation of the sign bit"
that Gil is alluding to?
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:31:08 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:00:48 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I thought 31-bit was for compatibility with existing exploitation
>of the sign bit; but there was no legacy convention of using
>the sign bit of shorter addresses stored in a doubleword to
>preserve compatibility with.
Todd,
You can use the 'COMMAND' JCL statement. See the JCL Reference manual.
EX: //___COMMAND'S_VTAM'__comments (where underscores are blanks)
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior Technical Engineer
Office: (408) 970 - 7978
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discuss
What utility program (or proc) is available that will allow me to enter
operator commands via a batch job?
Thanks, Todd (trying to avoid writing one.)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Looks like a pair of 6's with a 7 kicker. I wouldn't bet the house!
-Original Message-
Rob van der Heij
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But $173.82 for 84 pages? Plus shipping.
No more worries about the Dow Jones. I'm sitting on gold!
http
Herman,
If the source code is lost, did the application promotion process
(development ==> QA ==> Production) by any chance save the compiler
listings? Source is *much* more easily recovered from a listing than
from a load module. Recovery from a listing could be handled with some
Rexx code (or
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But $173.82 for 84 pages? Plus shipping.
No more worries about the Dow Jones. I'm sitting on gold!
http://www.rvdheij.nl/fullhouse.jpg
-Rob
--
For IBM
OOPS!
You are correct. PSYNCH is from
M-TECH MERCURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
David Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
10/20/2008 04:09 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Using RACF for Single Signon ( l
I think the Vanguard product is called ez/Signon. We don't use it, so I can't
comment on it.
Dave Long
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:25:43 -0500, Mark Zelden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:50:49 -0400, Jerry Fuchs
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Marv,
>>
>>We use Vanguard PSYNCH.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:57:12 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
>Mohammad Khan wrote:
>> And why was it expected to be 63 bit ? Was there an expectation that one
>> bit will be used to distinguish a 63 bit address from 31 / 24 bit addresses ?
>
No, because there was no prior convention of using a doublewo
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:13:26 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
>
>I've never seen any IBM utility that would convert from variable to
>fixed, ...
>
Have you tried REPRO?
> ..., or convert the carriage control characters. I've always use a RYO
>utility, custom built, for those transitions.
>
That, I don
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:23:51 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>Alas, no. They give you could that, with luck, will compile into the same
>object code, but it is *not* the source code, and you will have lost the
>labels, variable names and comments. ...
And I would
In a message dated 10/20/2008 1:48:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>The z/Architecture Principles of Operation, SA22-7832-06, is now $1434.96!
>I hope someone can correct those prices. Maybe they are in Yen.
Or maybe IBM is pricing based on the expected value o
How about this for a Program Directory:
IBM Fault Analyzer for z/OS V9R1 Program Directory (GI10-8802-00)
Abstract:
This document contains the prerequisties and the installation
information for IBM Fault Analyzer.
Price:
USD 41.35
The price shown above does not include taxes.
Add to cart
The Serena ChangeMan (v5.6.1) ZMF admin manual lists the following 'data
transmission vehicle' products: IBM BDT, CONNECT:Direct, NetMaster File
Transfer Management, IBM NetView FTP, and XCOM, for use with their product. If
you don't have, or don't want to use any of those products, can you use
Steve Comstock wrote:
Did you know the quoted price for these little gems
(that came from the original S/360 "green card") are
now priced at $173.82?!!
It seems that older ones have gone up, also.
The S/370 reference summary, GX20-1850-07, used to
be reasonably priced but is now $72.02.
The
When you say
"1 VS COBOL program"
Do you mean VS COBOL II or OS/VS COBOL? If it is OS/VS COBOL, then this may
WELL be part of the problem.
However, for either VS COBOL II or OS/VS COBOL, was the program compiled
with RES or NORES? (You can use COBANAL or Edge Portfolio to find this
out). If
I remember when I took a university course on 370 assembler language
programming.
A "yellow card" was a couple of bucks and we were allowed to use it when
taking the tests, along with anything that we could write on it.
Here we go with another "good ol days" thread :-)
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Techno
In the case of normal COBOL termination (e.g., GOBACK from main, STOP RUN,
etc.) or abnormal COBOL termination (e.g., abend with TRAP(ON) in effect),
COBOL will attempt to close any files that were left open and the C03 abend
will be avoided. However, if an assembler program dynamically loads a
It's probably the leather bound, gold edged,
collector's edition ... what with the mainframe
being dead and all. ;-)
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:15:56 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: z/Architecture Reference Summary
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>
> Did you know the quoted price
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:15:56 -0600, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Did you know the quoted price for these little gems
>(that came from the original S/360 "green card") are
>now priced at $173.82?!!
>
>I know they're downloadable for free, but I wanted
>to hand them out to a class in t
Did you know the quoted price for these little gems
(that came from the original S/360 "green card") are
now priced at $173.82?!!
I know they're downloadable for free, but I wanted
to hand them out to a class in the little booklet
form, not on 8.5 * 11 copy paper.
But $173.82 for 84 pages? Plus
Mohammad Khan wrote:
And why was it expected to be 63 bit ? Was there an expectation that one
bit will be used to distinguish a 63 bit address from 31 / 24 bit addresses ?
During the early discussions, many people expected ESAME to implement
63-bit addressing for reasons similar to why XA/3
Hi list,
I know very little about MQSeries except that I'm having a problem with
it and I don't know enough about it to even know where to look next.
We are running MQ 5.3.1 on z/OS 1.7. According to a DISPLAY ARCHIVE
command, I have the ARCRETN period set to 5 days. We discovered that
for some
Radoslaw
This reminds me of a comment made to me by a Russian who took me to see
his ministry's[1] "computer" stand[2] at an exhibition in Sokolniki Park and
then
to see another ministry's stand. Disparagingly he translated one of the cards
for me which, in a manner comparable to boasting how
Raj,
If all you want is a listing of Jobname, RC, and runtime you will probably
find it much simpler to process the SMF Type 30 records, rather than trying
to massage this information out of SPOOL via SDSF.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
>
> On your "Started JOB library member", put a valid job statement with
> MSGCLASS and MSGLEVEL operands.
Already had this:
//CICSTECH JOB ,'TECHIE SANDBOX',MSGCLASS=8,TIME=1440
//OUT1 OUTPUT J
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
>
> -
> A phenomenon known as the $300,000,000 PC.
>
> >>
> >> Frank DiGilio's Mainframe Mythbusting presentation cites the Wall
> >> Street Journa
On your "Started JOB library member", put a valid job statement with
MSGCLASS and MSGLEVEL operands.
Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
Running z/OS 1.9, JES2.
Like presumably most shops, we've configured JOBCLASS STC to send the
joblog, et al to the bit bucket. Now wanting to retain the joblog fo
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
>
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:17:19 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
>
> >Like presumably most shops, we've configured JOBCLASS STC to send the
> >joblog, et al to the bit bucket. Now wanting to retain the joblog
-
A phenomenon known as the $300,000,000 PC.
Frank DiGilio's Mainframe Mythbusting presentation cites the Wall
Street Journal as saying distributed server farms can generate up to
3800 watts per square foot! A z9 EC generates only 312 wa
--
Yeah Gil..ur right it was IEBGENER...But I heard it could not produce
desired output from VBA to FB
--
I've never seen any IBM utility that would convert from variable to
fixed, or convert the
If you've used OUTDISP to force deletion of the started task output, then
you would need to override that in your OUTPUT statement. If you use
a "dummy" SYSOUT class to suppress the job output, then you need to
specify a different SYSOUT class,
Bill
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:53:42 -0500, Chase, John
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Big Iron
>
> I think that you are missing a couple of things. You would at least
need to
> specify the new SYSOUT class on the OUTPUT statement.
But from my reading of the JCL Reference, that should not be necessary;
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:17:19 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Like presumably most shops, we've configured JOBCLASS STC to send the
>joblog, et al to the bit bucket. Now wanting to retain the joblog for
>CICS regions, I've added an //OUT1 OUTPUT JESDS=ALL statement to the
>started j
I think that you are missing a couple of things. You would at least need to
specify the new SYSOUT class on the OUTPUT statement. I am not sure,
however, if that would work. The way that we override message class is to
assign a job card to the started task (IEFJOBS) and specify MSGCLASS there.
Ther
Could you start your CICS like this
S CICSXX,MSGCLASS=A
Assuming Class A is standard SYSOUT.
The OUTPUT would be just for the JCL sysouts I think.
Lizette
>
> Hi, All,
>
> Running z/OS 1.9, JES2.
>
> Like presumably most shops, we've configured JOBCLASS STC to send the
> joblog, et al to th
Hi, All,
Running z/OS 1.9, JES2.
Like presumably most shops, we've configured JOBCLASS STC to send the
joblog, et al to the bit bucket. Now wanting to retain the joblog for
CICS regions, I've added an //OUT1 OUTPUT JESDS=ALL statement to the
started job library member for my "sandbox" CICS regio
And why was it expected to be 63 bit ? Was there an expectation that one
bit will be used to distinguish a 63 bit address from 31 / 24 bit addresses ?
Mohammad
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:33:22 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>It's analogous to why IBM implemented 64-bit addressing
--
OK, sorted.
J.I.C. anyone else struggles with this, it was caused by PREFIX being set to
NOPREFIX, therefore SDF2INV was trying to LIBDEF the wrong DSN.
IE: The DSN should have had the userid as the HLQ.
Cheers,
Hi Mark and Barry,
I'm sorry to take so long to reply - I think I'm on a different time zone to
you
(I'm in the UK) and don't work weekends normally. Plus I was stuck in
meetings for most of Friday. Anyway, you are spot on with your advice and
I'm really surprised that CA didn't suggest chec
Hi
Somewhere a complete XML System Services sample ?
I would like to see some performance compare with the XML Toolkit
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax: (+43) 2236 21081
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hotl
Reentrant programs from authorized libraries loaded into subppol 251. All other
programs are loaded into subpool 252 which is NOT fetch protected. Perhaps
using CEE.SCEERUN as STEPLIB/JOBLIB looses the status of an authorized
library. Unfortunally also just a guess without a dump.
Verify if th
Hi Denis,
CEE.SCEERUN is the last of 4 datasets in JOBLIB statement. 3 datasets prior
to CEE.SCEERUN are datasets application developers' load libraries.
Thanks and regards.
Mürsel Taşgın
BT Sistem Yönetimi
Yönetici Yardımcısı
Akbank Genel Müdürlüğü
Sabancı Center 34330, İstanbul
Tel: + 90 212 3
Hi,
It is a DB2 Cobol program and make calls to other programs compiled with
ASM, Enterprise Cobol and 1 VS Cobol program.
We think that there is a problem with the program (ie. Not closing datasets
properly etc.) But we cannot understand why does it work with CEE.SCEERUN in
JOBLIB and doesn't wor
53 matches
Mail list logo
