On 2/27/2010 at 8:13 AM, in message
listserv%201002270913195378.0...@bama.ua.edu, Eric Bielefeld
eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com wrote:
I'm curious. How much more does z/OS cost than z/VSE? An
approximate percentage is good enough.
I have no idea. I'm just an apps guy.
What are your reasons for
Is IBM cobol for OS/390 VM v1r2 is still supported under regular support
terms? If so, is there any drop from support date?
ITschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Hi Itschak,
The place to look is IBMs Software Support Lifecycle page
(http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycle/index_a_z.html).
David Stephens
Lead Systems Programmer
d...@longpelaexpertise.com.au
www.longpelaexpertise.com.au
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/images/logo.gif
Thanks. It look like it is not supported anymore.
ITschak
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:45 PM, David Stephens
d...@longpelaexpertise.com.au wrote:
Hi Itschak,
The place to look is IBMs Software Support Lifecycle page (
http://www-01.ibm.com/software/support/lifecycle/index_a_z.html).
David
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Is IBM cobol for OS/390 VM v1r2 is still supported under regular support
terms? If so, is there any drop from support date?
ITschak
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 6:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Red Alert: All TCPIP users on z/OS 1.11 (2010.02.26)
I seem to remember a similar red alert last year
In listserv%201002240949176433.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 02/24/2010
at 09:49 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Size doesn't matter? For example, consider X11, where the terms are
widely misused.
Likewise SMTP.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position;
In m3y6irr6mo@garlic.com, on 02/17/2010
at 02:42 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com said:
As an aside, vm370 release 6 ... was the last free vm370 kernel ... the
next release being vm/sp release 1
You don't consider SEPP (VM/SE) or BSEPP (VM/BSE) to be VM releases?
--
Shmuel
In 8s7ko59k15vnib8c1qkvaqo83dkjppj...@4ax.com, on 02/28/2010
at 09:48 AM, Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com said:
Who suggested another case?
Nobody suggested *any* case; you left it open. That makes it reasonable to
take it as a general statement, rather than as one limited to a
In 4b89f3d6.60...@valley.net, on 02/27/2010
at 11:40 PM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said:
AFAIK, IBM distributed a type 3 program named RACS (Remote
Access Computing System) in the mid sixties; Boston University modified
that to develop RAX; and McGill modified it to MUSIC.
I
jim.marsh...@opm.gov (Jim Marshall) writes:
P.S. Getting the first of a new generation of IBM computer, the IBM 3032,
made us a showplace besides being in the Pentagon. But 6 months later IBM
shipped the first IBM 3033 to Singer up in New Jersey, we were obsolete and
never got the IBM
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
You don't consider SEPP (VM/SE) or BSEPP (VM/BSE) to be VM releases?
re:
From: Frank Swarbrick frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Sun, February 28, 2010 2:52:46 AM
Subject: Re: Item on TPF
--SNIP---
In my opinion only. I could list probably 20 things I miss from VSE.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net shmuel%2bibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
You don't consider SEPP (VM/SE) or BSEPP (VM/BSE) to be VM releases?
(Basic) System Extensions Program Product? No, that would be an add-on.
Sorry. The first CHANGE PATH switches /Service/ and /, the second changes
it right back.
Looks like a waste to me, but maybe there is something I am missing.
Scott Rowe scott.r...@joann.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
02/27/2010 07:23 PM
Please respond to
IBM
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:26:44 -0500, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
I think we are talking about two different issues.
Entirely possible. My apologies if I've misunderstood.
Now, if you were to do this with a running system (z/Linux for
instance), I'd think that the auditors
On 28 February 2010 20:52, John Mattson john_matt...@ea.epson.com wrote:
Sorry. The first CHANGE PATH switches /Service/ and /, the second changes
it right back.
Looks like a waste to me, but maybe there is something I am missing.
The second may change more than just what the first change
On 28 February 2010 16:13, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com wrote:
they took the 158 integrated channel microcode and split it into
separate (dedicated 158 engine) box for the 303x channel controller.
the 3031 then becomes a 158 with just the 370 microcode and a
2nd/separate 158 with just
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
t...@harminc.net (Tony Harminc) writes:
I don't know how similar the 158 and 155 really were (certainly very
different front panel implementations), but it's
I will be out of the office starting 03/01/2010 and will not return until
03/08/2010.
I will respond to your message when I return.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
20 matches
Mail list logo
