Re: IOCDS Question

2008-10-10 Thread Roy Hewitt
. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neubert, Kevin Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 5:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IOCDS Question I wouldn't expect them to match if dynamic activity has take place since the last POR. I

IOCDS Question

2008-10-09 Thread Hal Merritt
Just finished a roll out of a new IODF/IOCDS across all five of my active LPAR's. All the displays except one are as expected. The one odd display is on the HMC Activation Profile for the POR profile. The list of IOCDS's look good, but the 'current active' does not agree with any of the other

Re: IOCDS Question

2008-10-09 Thread Neubert, Kevin
Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 2:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IOCDS Question Just finished a roll out of a new IODF/IOCDS across all five of my active LPAR's. All the displays except one are as expected. The one odd

Re: IOCDS Question

2008-10-09 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:41:44 -0700, Neubert, Kevin wrote: I wouldn't expect them to match if dynamic activity has take place since the last POR. I believe the IOCDS is write protected for the life of the POR. What happened when you built the new IOCDS (i.e., wrote it out to the SE)? I don't

Re: IOCDS Question

2008-10-09 Thread Hal Merritt
Return code zero - nothing unexpected. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neubert, Kevin Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 5:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IOCDS Question I wouldn't expect them to match if dynamic

IOCDS question

2005-06-15 Thread Goings, Rob
We are a single processor shop running in Lpar mode. The machine is a 2064-104, but we're running it as a 103. At the end of this month we will turn on the 4th engine. My question is, are there any changes the the IOCDS I need to make when we add this 4th engine? Rob R. Goings Sr.

Re: IOCDS question

2005-06-15 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goings, Rob Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IOCDS question We are a single processor shop running in Lpar mode. The machine is a 2064-104

Re: IOCDS question

2005-06-15 Thread Kok, Howi
so that the added engine will come online automatically after the IPL. Howi Kok -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goings, Rob Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IOCDS question We

Re: IOCDS question

2005-06-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
... My question is, are there any changes the the IOCDS I need to make when we add this 4th engine? ... No. Just to the LPAR profiles, and only for the next re-start of each profile. That is, if you defined the LPARs with RESERVED CPs. Also, you may want to review your weights. -teD (The

Re: IOCDS question

2005-06-15 Thread Desi de la Garza
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ted MacNEIL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 7:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IOCDS question ... My question is, are there any changes the the IOCDS I need to make when we add this 4th engine? ... No. Just