REXX STORAGE (was: Why would I use System REXX as shown in the sample? (was: RO command query))

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:42:26 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote: >... >Personally, until there is a supported / alternate "STORAGE" function >that I can use, I probably won't be doing much with it.Console >automation packages can be used instead. >... I know this is the wrong forum to discuss this,

Re: Why would I use System REXX as shown in the sample? (was: RO command query)

: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Why would I use System REXX as shown in the sample? (was: RO command query) On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:38:36 +0100, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote: Samples are just that. They aren't indicative of the best way to do something. But good samples are better tha

Re: Why would I use System REXX as shown in the sample? (was: RO command query)

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:38:36 +0100, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote: Samples are just that. They aren't indicative of the best way to do something. But good samples are better than bad samples. :-) >What (advantage) am I missing? > Being able to execute the process from an operator console as

Why would I use System REXX as shown in the sample? (was: RO command query)

>If this is only system REXX issue, there is an example of using >AXRMLWTO in the MVS Authorized Assembler Services Guide: >http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2A881/31. 5?SHELF=IEA2BK81&DT=20080120225118 While we're at it: I once more tried to understand the advantage o