On 5/1/09 4:20 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> Morituri te Salutant! :-)
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, sed dulcius pro patria vivere, et
dulcissimum pro patria bibere. Ergo, bibamus pro salute patriae.
-- db
Thanks Rob!
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS & z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of
On: Fri, May 01, 2009 at 09:02:33PM -0500,Marcy Cortes Wrote:
} >I think John has the answer. How big are your checkpoint and warm start
areas?
}
} 9 cyl. As big as it gets.
That SHOULD be big enough, so keep looking. O well.
Its been a while since I allocated a ckpt or warm area. Is
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
> The pathological cases of "This guest runs away, real Swap DASD gives me a
> chance to control it" are perfectly valid, but don't contradict the statement
> that VDISK is better *for performance*; rather, they support it.
Let me show you
As one of the SWAPGEN authors, I've watched this discussion.
I'd note that Barton's original statement stands, in the context in which he
said it: VDISK has always provided better *performance* in every observed case.
The concerns about "using up real memory" have never been supported by the dat
