Based on your comment I guess either the operator did not specify a
loadparm, even when he was instructed to do so, or the loadparm was not
recognized for some reason. Hm, well, I can't guess what is would be. Nex
t
IPL we can look into it.
I did some testing with a guest VM. IPL with known co
On 5/24/07, Berry van Sleeuwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a different building. My last HMC was the one on a 9672. It is a real
pleasure I must be able to help our operators during IPL but to have no
recent knowledge of the newer HMC and it's procedures and capabilities :-
Experienced VM opera
The drag&drop is simply the way to give an LPAR an "integrated 3270
console". It does not instruct SAPL to display/bypass its panel.
The display of the SAPL panel is requested by entering the address of a 3270
in the LOADPARM field (enter SYSG to indicate the "integrated 3207 console")
When the
Kris,
The VM is z/VM 5.2 RSU 601.
I can test it with one LPAR that still needs to be IPLled. We have cloned
some VM's so apart from some small local tailoring (like nodeID and TCPIP
configs) the VM's are identical. Let's play around a little bit. Either a
s
guest or native.
You mention drag 'n
In my eyes, the best order is
Operator_Consoles SYSTEM_3270 DE00 DF00 0820 0400 0009 SYSTEM_Console
What means: if you are at the HMC to IPL: drag a 3270 icon onto the VM LPAR
and IPL, you'll have the VM console in front of you. When VM is IPLed, kill
the integrated 3270 console window from the
Hello Kris,
You and John did hit the problem, at least part of it.
The OPERATOR is logged on to SYSC:
13:53:22 SYSC LOGON AS OPERATOR USERS = 1
The consoledefinitions in the SYSTEM CONFIG are:
Operator_Consoles DE00 DF00 0820 0400 0009 SYSTEM_Console SYSTEM_3270
Emergency_Message_Console
to AUTO_WARM_IPL and other
such parms?
Is loadparm being specified on the new hmc?
David
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Thu 5/24/2007 8:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] IPL without OPERATOR on console
T
: [IBMVM] IPL without OPERATOR on console
There had to be a configuration change between the old machine and the
z9. VM won't behave that differently just because of different hardware.
Berry van Sleeuwen wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Last week we have seen an IPL that did not go the way I&
PL without OPERATOR on console
Hello List,
Last week we have seen an IPL that did not go the way I'd expected. It
went OK, so VM is running, but it doesn't feel right.
In the past our IPL procedures were:
- Connect a terminal session to a console (let's say device 820)
- load the LPAR
There had to be a configuration change between the old machine and the
z9. VM won't behave that differently just because of different hardware.
Berry van Sleeuwen wrote:
Hello List,
Last week we have seen an IPL that did not go the way I'd expected. It
went OK, so VM is running, but it doe
Hello List,
Last week we have seen an IPL that did not go the way I'd expected. It
went OK, so VM is running, but it doesn't feel right.
In the past our IPL procedures were:
- Connect a terminal session to a console (let's say device 820)
- load the LPAR on HMC with loadparm 820.
- On the conso
11 matches
Mail list logo
