TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-08-13 Thread Karl J Severson
 I thought I'd do a follow up on this problem for anyone who might be interested and who may have a similar setup to the one we do. I was fairly confident that VM:Operator wasn't to blame for the problem but contacted CA anyway since the only error codes we ever got were from VM:Operator. After CA

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-08-12 Thread Karl J Severson
I thought I'd do a follow up on this problem for anyone who might be interested and who may have a similar setup to the one we do. I was fairly confident that VM:Operator wasn't to blame for the problem but contacted CA anyway since the only error codes we ever got were from VM:Operator. After CA a

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-22 Thread Karl J Severson
That's okay. I'll be checking with Computer Associates tomorrow since the error message I was getting was from VM:Operator. I checked to make sure we were running the most recent version of VM:Manager and Operator and we appear to be. Somehow though I think it's a TCPIP problem but I don't really c

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 07/21/2008 at 10:16 EDT, Karl J Severson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I should have mentioned what servers I have. I have four 3006 > Integrated Servers (P/390s) which run OS/2 and VM. By sessions I mean the PCOMM > 3270 console screens which display VM:Operator and which can

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Karl J Severson
-The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote: -To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUFrom: Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System Date: 07/21/2008 11:45AMSubject: Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 CodeI would guess that every weekend a firewall is rebooted.  I don't understand about "rebo

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Thomas Kern
WHen you have to explain the procedure to management that doesn't underst and an 'Initial Program Load' and doesn't know that we once had to toggle in a 'bootstrap' program into the "Play Computer"s of decades ago. /Tom Kern On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:35:25 -0400, Phillip Parmelee <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Wakser, David
Perhaps we also need to rename the "bootstrap record" to the "IPL record"? -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Post Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 2:44 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: TCPIP &

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 07/21/2008 at 02:14 EDT, Karl J Severson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was happy to see that others are using PCOMM so perhaps someone will be able > to figure out my plight. I use the OS/2 flavor (4.21) and promptly each > Saturday, my console and any other open sessions running VM

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:35 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Phillip Parmelee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since when does a mainframe 'boot'? On VM, CP does an IPL. Since at least 1999, and probably before, in the IBM lab in Boeblingen. Some reason you feel the need to be so picky a

Re: TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Phillip Parmelee
Since when does a mainframe 'boot'? On VM, CP does an IPL. Phil Parmelee IBM Global Services VM/VSE Team Harrisburg, PA 717-526-1250 T/L 239-1250 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-21 Thread Karl J Severson
I was happy to see that others are using PCOMM so perhaps someone will be able to figure out my plight. I use the OS/2 flavor (4.21) and promptly each Saturday, my console and any other open sessions running VM go blank and there is a 658 code on the bottom of the frame of each open session. I don'

TCPIP & PCOMM 658 Code

2008-07-20 Thread Karl J Severson
I was happy to see that others are using PCOMM so perhaps someone will be able to figure out my plight. I use the OS/2 flavor (4.21) and promptly each Saturday, my console and any other open sessions running VM go blank and there is a 658 code on the bottom of the frame of each open session. I don'