Re: Problem with cvs_acls script?

2005-02-01 Thread Captain Tantric
Thanks Mark, but I have been using that in my config file since a prior upgrade to 1.12.10. > You may find doing something that enables the use of the new format > strings to be desirable... > > cvs checkout CVSROOT > echo 'UseNewInfoFmtStrings=yes' >> CVSROOT/config > cvs commit CVSROOT/config >

Re: Problem with cvs_acls script?

2005-02-01 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Captain Tantric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This could be something I've done wrong, but am at a loss as to figure > out a way around it. I'm running cvs 1.12.11 on Linux and have > recently added the cvs_acls script to my commitinfo file. The cvs_a

Problem with cvs_acls script?

2005-02-01 Thread Captain Tantric
Greetings, This could be something I've done wrong, but am at a loss as to figure out a way around it. I'm running cvs 1.12.11 on Linux and have recently added the cvs_acls script to my commitinfo file. The cvs_acls script works properly, the problem appears to be the way it is invoked by the line

Re: CVS diff and unknown files.

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On , January 31, 2005 at 20:30:21 (+0300), Sergei Organov wrote: ] > Subject: Re: CVS diff and unknown files. > > Don't you wish to even try to understand the suggestion? The suggestion > is: invoke *the same triggers* both at 'cvs add' and 'cvs commit' time, > -- there is no need for separate tr

Re: CVS diff and unknown files.

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Tuesday, February 1, 2005 at 04:24:48 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ] > Subject: Re: CVS diff and unknown files. > > > The first is Greg Woods' > proposal to make "cvs add" be a purely local operation. The "purely local" part is more a side-effect of making "cvs add" orthogonal to "cvs rm", w

RE: Sharing Common Files

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Monday, January 31, 2005 at 10:24:00 (-0800), Matt Doar wrote: ] > Subject: RE: Sharing Common Files > > So regardless of whether you are linking to files or directories, server > side soft links are not a good idea. A client side script to recreate > them can be versioned. Precisely. This i

Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics (was Re: Triggers)

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Monday, January 31, 2005 at 08:05:47 (-0800), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ] > Subject: Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics (was Re: Triggers) > > If I move 'foo.c' to 'bar.c' the CVS/Entries file is going to be confused. > > In general, doing lots of bulk renaming and local 'cvs add' and 'cvs r

Re: Overview of files / dirs / modules in the repository

2005-02-01 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Is it possible to get some kind of overview of the CVS repository structure > without using 3rd party tools like viewcvs? cvs checkout -d -l top . > I'm asking because if for example a user forgets the module he checked >

Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics (was Re: Triggers)

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Monday, January 31, 2005 at 01:18:36 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ] > Subject: Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics (was Re: Triggers) > > 'Course, Greg has claimed in the past that he already has a patch... Actually, no, I have never made any such claim. I've posted everything I have done s

Re: Is it secure to use CVS over the Internet?

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Monday, January 31, 2005 at 10:21:07 (-0400), Néstor Boscán wrote: ] > Subject: Is it secure to use CVS over the Internet? > > Is it secure to use CVS over the Internet?. Sure, of course. Thousands do it every day, many times per day, all over the world. (assuming you don't use the fundamen

Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics (was Re: Triggers)

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 22:24:06 (-0800), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ] > Subject: Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics (was Re: Triggers) > > - there are good reasons for 'cvs add' to have an advisory process > (which becomes an enforcement at cvs commit time) > > a) inform the use

Re: user privileges for files / dirs / modules

2005-02-01 Thread Larry Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Is it possible to give specific files / directories / modules specific user > privileges? Yes, on a per-directory basis. See the manual for details: -Larry Jones >From now on, I'm devoting

RE: user privileges for files / dirs / modules

2005-02-01 Thread Christopher.Fouts
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >] On Behalf Of Jim.Hyslop >Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 2:57 PM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; info-cvs@gnu.org >Subject: RE: user privileges for files / dirs / modules > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Is it possible t

Re: Triggers (was Re: CVS diff and unknown files.)

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Sunday, January 30, 2005 at 16:45:35 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ] > Subject: Re: Triggers (was Re: CVS diff and unknown files.) > > It's not so unusual for people who have done SCM for many years on > large and varied projects. Well it depends -- you seem to belong to a (hopefully small and

RE: user privileges for files / dirs / modules

2005-02-01 Thread Jim.Hyslop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is it possible to give specific files / directories / modules > specific user privileges? [...] > Our CVS repository (/cvs) is stored on a RedHat 9 machine. A > group 'cvsusers' exists. Typically for this scenario, it's as simple as taking advantage of the security off

Re: user privileges for files / dirs / modules

2005-02-01 Thread Mark D. Baushke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Is it possible to give specific files / directories / modules specific > user privileges? We need to be able to give people access priviledges > to selective directories. Normally, one has access only to the > component tha

Re: Triggers (was Re: CVS diff and unknown files.)

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Saturday, January 29, 2005 at 15:22:34 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ] > Subject: Re: Triggers (was Re: CVS diff and unknown files.) > > But you fail to > understand the problem. I understand the problem perfectly. You don't seem to understand the fact that "cvs add" and "cvs rm" are supposed

Re: CVS diff and unknown files.

2005-02-01 Thread Greg A. Woods
[ On Saturday, January 29, 2005 at 13:09:59 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ] > Subject: Re: CVS diff and unknown files. > > > But think about what's really going on. You need to try harder to follow your own advice. > If > the work will be refused anyway, why would you possibly want to > deliber

Re: Equivalent to "cvs log -rBASE::HEAD"?

2005-02-01 Thread Larry Jones
Jim Searle writes: > > I found this question in the archives, but never saw an answer. Is there a > way to get 'BASE' to work with 'cvs log'? Yes, by fixing the code, which I just did. :-) The fix will be in the next releases. If you just can't wait, here's a patch (for the stable [1.11] bran

Overview of files / dirs / modules in the repository

2005-02-01 Thread matthias
Is it possible to get some kind of overview of the CVS repository structure without using 3rd party tools like viewcvs? I'm asking because if for example a user forgets the module he checked in two weeks ago. How does he find out the name of the module? Thx for your help. -matt ___

user privileges for files / dirs / modules

2005-02-01 Thread matthias
Is it possible to give specific files / directories / modules specific user privileges? We need to be able to give people access priviledges to selective directories. Normally, one has access only to the component that he is working on. Our CVS repository (/cvs) is stored on a RedHat 9 machine. A

structure problem eclispe & cvs

2005-02-01 Thread Jürgen Scheffler
Hello Helpers, the CVS structure doesn=3Ft match my local structure, a sample: CVS: /ind-proj/src/actions/XYAction.java local: /ind-proj/WEB-INF/src/actions/XYAction.java How can I configure CVS, to use the right path, the WEB-INF path? Help!! it=3Fs urgend! got release date 21.Feb :-/ Hopefu

Re: CVS diff and unknown files.

2005-02-01 Thread Sergei Organov
Paul Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 31, 2005, at 9:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] > > Don't you wish to even try to understand the suggestion? The suggestion > > is: invoke *the same triggers* both at 'cvs add' and 'cvs commit' time, > > -- there is no need for separate triggers

Re: CVS diff and unknown files.

2005-02-01 Thread Sergei Organov
Paul Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Paul Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Would you post a message stating your point of view, completely, > >> please? Thanks! > > > > I need a way to generate 'cvs diff' against read-only repo

Re: CVS diff and unknown files.

2005-02-01 Thread Paul Sander
On Feb 1, 2005, at 2:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Would you post a message stating your point of view, completely, please? Thanks! I need a way to generate 'cvs diff' against read-only repository. To achieve this it's enough to fix 'cvs add' so that it eit

Re: CVS diff and unknown files.

2005-02-01 Thread Sergei Organov
Paul Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 30, 2005, at 2:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Todd Denniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Sergei Organov wrote: > >>> > >>> Todd Denniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If "cvs -n commit" runs the triggers to do your check(see