I guess you're gonna hate this :)
So what you're saying is that it is *consistent* with regard to the
implementation of methods/functions, i.e. __get behaves as an
ordinary method.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> So, what's the reasoning behind this design
Hi,
On 1/14/2009 18:29, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
That is one example of convoluted code that is already possible. If a
developer creates such a mess is his fault.
"Convoluted"? "Mess"? Are you kidding me? It's standard usage of
access handlers.
I don't understand how that could be stan
On 1/14/2009 01:15, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Also, this adds very new thing to PHP - objects that change while
being assigned. I am not sure it is a good thing.
Well Closures are a brand new thing in PHP. So far we had nothing even
remotely close to the closures we have right now.
Th
PHP written in a JavaScript style is already possible with PHP 5.3. I
started a little
thread about this on a forum but didn't get that much feedback:
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=565576
It's not really what we're used to in JavaScript but it's very close.
On 12/25/2008 0
On 12/19/2008 17:39, Robin Burchell wrote:
Ugh. Apparantly I forgot to CC the list on those last two mails..
Sorry. Pasted so others stay in on the conversation:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:18 PM, troels knak-nielsen wrote:
That's an interesting mail, expresses a viewpoint I hadn't considered,
On 12/16/2008 14:23, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 3:20 PM, troels knak-nielsen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Scott MacVicar wrote:
For now I'll be leaving it as is and adding a JSON_STRICT_ENCODE
parameter to the options flag. So you can use
json_encode($var,
On 11/3/2008 17:41, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Ionut,
some remarks about your proposal:
1) You can turn any array into a Traversable using
(Recursive)ArrayIterator. Though this solution is still slow. The issue is
that the c-level code needs to verify the current pointer every single time
i
Hello everybody,
As a result of the advice given in the thread "array_key_exists BC
break", I have written an
RFC concerning some higher order functions that, I believe, could a
helpful addition to the language.
Please note that I'm a userland developer and have no clue about PHP
internals s
elsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi Ionut
>
> 2008/10/28 Ionut Gabriel Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > While we're at this and considering the new lambdas that we now have in
> the
> > language
> > I must say I'd like some functions to
While we're at this and considering the new lambdas that we now have in
the language
I must say I'd like some functions to support Traversables. Those would be:
array_map(), array_reduce(), array_filter(), array_walk() and
array_walk_recursive()
Although I'd rather want a class (because the a
But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
On 10/23/2008 23:40, Mark van der Velden wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I notice that 5.3 differs from 5.2 in how array_key_exists treats
objects. In 5.2, if the second parameter (array) is allowed to be obj
ginal Message
From: Gregory Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ionut Gabriel Stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:25:31 AM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: Namespaced function vs static method in global class
Ionut Gabriel Stan wrote:
Actually, I somehow understand what he wants, considering we'll soon have
lambdas and closures. I mean, in case of javascript a variable can hold as well
a function as it can hold anything else. Anyway, I don't think this is the case
for PHP. I do find it ugly to write $function(), but I guess I
Hi,
I've decided to play a little with namespaces as some of you asked for feedback
on this list or on your blogs. I'm just an userland developer and have no clue
about PHP internals so forgive me if I say something stupid in this regard.
Here's what I found on some simple test. It may be the in
Done,
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44987
Thank you,
Ionut
--- Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ionut,
>
> file as bug please.
>
> marcus
>
> Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 12:37:45 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm working on a SOAP project and as part of the
> > checks I
Hi,
I'm working on a SOAP project and as part of the
checks I make are the existence and readability of the
WSDL file.
As far as I saw, SoapClient doesn't check include_path
for the WSDL file, so I thought I could use fopen to
check this and then find the real path which would be
finally passed t
16 matches
Mail list logo
