heh, i just don't think thats the typical case. Its definitely extreme.
Even still, in many cases using the filesystem (properly warmed) with
compression might still be better. It depends how you are measuring
latency. storing your whole index in gigabytes of heap ram without any
compression on a
Based on reading the same comments you read, I'm pretty doubtful that
Codec.getDefault() is going to work. It seems to me that this
situation renders the FilterCodec a bit hard to to use, at least given
the 'every release deprecates a codec' sort of pattern.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Uwe
Robert,
Let me lay out the scenario.
Hardware has .5T of Index is relatively small. Application profiling
shows a significant amount of time spent codec-ing.
Options as I see them:
1. Use DPF complete with the irritation of having to have this
spurious codec name in the on-disk format that has
WHOOPS.
First sentence was, until just before I clicked 'send',
Hardware has .5T of RAM. Index is relatively small (20g) ...
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
Robert,
Let me lay out the scenario.
Hardware has .5T of Index is relatively small.
Hi,
How about Codec.getDefault()? It does indeed not necessarily return the newest
one (if somebody changes the default using Codec.setDefault()), but for your
use case wrapping the current default one, it should be fine?
I have not tried this yet, but there might be a chicken-egg problem:
-
Honestly i dont agree. I don't know what you are trying to do, but if
you want file format backwards compat working, then you need a
different FilterCodec to match each lucene codec.
Otherwise your codec is broken from a back compat standpoint. Wrapping
the latest is an antipattern here.
On
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Benson Margulies ben...@basistech.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly i dont agree. I don't know what you are trying to do, but if
you want file format backwards compat working, then you need a
different
[mailto:ben...@basistech.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 11:34 AM
To: java-user@lucene apache. org
Subject: Re: A codec moment or pickle
Based on reading the same comments you read, I'm pretty doubtful that
Codec.getDefault() is going to work. It seems to me that this situation
renders
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly i dont agree. I don't know what you are trying to do, but if
you want file format backwards compat working, then you need a
different FilterCodec to match each lucene codec.
Otherwise your codec is broken from a
