Can Sacha or somebody explain what the various http
replication schemes are ?
>Sacha: - sexy httpsession replication schemes
Ivelin
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your s
I'd be curious to hear what Gavin thinks about this.
Is he on this list?
Ivelin
--- Adrian Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ivelin,
>
> I don't know that pooling is required for a
> hibernate session.
>
> But one big advantage to j2ee is you can reuse
> the same code with different dep
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Many Specials running this week
THE RE.AL THING
not like the other sites that
imitate these products.
No hidd.en char.ges - Fast Delivery
Vic.odin Val.ium Xan.ax
Via.gra Diaz.epam Alpra.zolam
So.ma Fior.icet Amb.ien
Stil.nox Ult.ram Zo.loft
Clon.azepam At.ivan Tr.amadol
Xeni.cal Cele.brex V
Banned CD! Government don't want me to sell it. See Now &
sensuous burgundy plumbago defraud criterion almighty armful keel accentual mole vicar cdc arkansas durkin chile rensselaer mercy convalesce anagram curl danbury distributive archbishop adjutant midshipman phipps boomerang apices breadro
The current 3.2 invokers don't have any notion
of client callback. You could make it work if you
could guarantee an MBeanServer on the clients
(which you cannot).
Otherwise they would need to be modified to target
something other than an ObjectName on the MBus.
The remoting framework has client c
Hi Ivelin,
I don't know that pooling is required for a
hibernate session.
But one big advantage to j2ee is you can reuse
the same code with different deployment descriptors
to get different quality of service.
i.e. You can use the same bean inside outside a
transaction depending upon how you con
Bugs item #698682, was opened at 2003-03-06 14:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=698682&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution:
Bugs item #856982, was opened at 2003-12-09 18:51
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=856982&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Prior
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 19:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by airsquig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863113&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Prior
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 20:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tpeuss
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863113&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priorit
Yes, eventually.
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
Should we unify them and add to the jboss integration?
Gavin?
Ivelin
--- Alexey Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, I use this same approach for CMP over
Hibernate.
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
Related to this, I just bundled a proposed
addition to
the
As part of 4.0, we have to replace the smart proxies with clustered
interceptors, we could reuse them then.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Ivelin Ivanov
> Sent: dimanche, 21. décembre 2003 18:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
Should we unify them and add to the jboss integration?
Gavin?
Ivelin
--- Alexey Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I use this same approach for CMP over
> Hibernate.
>
> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Related to this, I just bundled a proposed
> addition to
> > the Hibernate/JBoss int
Pardon my negligence with JCA, but I think that the
added benefit of the proposed mechanism releases the
developer from the responsibility to manually worry
about closing sessions. Reduces the need for these
pesky try/catch/finally.
Since the Hibernate session is on top of a DataSource,
which is
Yes, this is how it works now.
The client side of the HAIL uses the singleton
notifications, which in turn use the DRM.
The question is how to implement the client stub so
that it does not have to be part of the cluster.
The smart RMI stubs take care of communicating with
the back end to receive
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 20:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by slaboure
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863113&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Prior
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 19:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by airsquig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863113&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Prior
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 20:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by slaboure
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863113&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Prior
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 20:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tpeuss
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863113&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priorit
Bugs item #863879, was opened at 2003-12-21 11:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863879&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: No
Bugs item #863561, was opened at 2003-12-20 15:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mikezzz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863561&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #863113, was opened at 2003-12-19 20:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by slaboure
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=863113&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Prior
25 matches
Mail list logo
